Intraosseous route is associated with prolonged epinephrine-to-ROSC interval in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Michael W Hubble, Stephen Taylor, Melisa Martin, Sara Houston, Ginny R Kaplan, Randy D Kearns
{"title":"Intraosseous route is associated with prolonged epinephrine-to-ROSC interval in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.","authors":"Michael W Hubble, Stephen Taylor, Melisa Martin, Sara Houston, Ginny R Kaplan, Randy D Kearns","doi":"10.1007/s11845-025-03979-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prolonged resuscitation is associated with poor patient outcomes. While the importance of bystander CPR and early defibrillation is well-known, the role of other components affecting resuscitation duration is less well-established. We postulated that first-dose intraosseous (IO) epinephrine would prolong the pressor-to-ROSC interval compared to intravenous (IV) drug administration.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To describe the relationship between first epinephrine administration route and pressor-to-ROSC intervals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of the 2020 ESO Data Collaborative Annual Research dataset was conducted among adults who experienced non-traumatic, bystander-witnessed arrests. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to determine the influence of first epinephrine route on the pressor-to-ROSC interval. End-of-event was defined as ROSC, field termination of resuscitation, or hospital arrival without ROSC, with right censoring of the latter group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 9351 patients were included for analysis, of which 63.9% were males. The mean age of participants was 65.3(± 15.5) years and presumed cardiac etiology was present in 82.7% of arrests. An initial shockable rhythm was present in 27.1%, while 29.7% received bystander CPR and 39.7% attained ROSC. The mean pressor-to-ROSC interval was 13.21(± 9.65), 14.86 (± 10.89), and 14.42 (± 10.52) minutes for the intravenous, tibial IO, and humeral IO routes, respectively (p < 0.001). First epinephrine administration via the tibial or humeral IO route was associated with a decreased hazard of ROSC compared to the IV route (HR = 0.78, p < 0.001 and HR = 0.86, p = 0.01 per minute, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These data suggest that the tibial and humeral IO routes of first epinephrine administration were associated with marginally prolonged resuscitation duration after drug administration and decreasing hazard of ROSC.</p>","PeriodicalId":14507,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-025-03979-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prolonged resuscitation is associated with poor patient outcomes. While the importance of bystander CPR and early defibrillation is well-known, the role of other components affecting resuscitation duration is less well-established. We postulated that first-dose intraosseous (IO) epinephrine would prolong the pressor-to-ROSC interval compared to intravenous (IV) drug administration.

Aims: To describe the relationship between first epinephrine administration route and pressor-to-ROSC intervals.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of the 2020 ESO Data Collaborative Annual Research dataset was conducted among adults who experienced non-traumatic, bystander-witnessed arrests. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to determine the influence of first epinephrine route on the pressor-to-ROSC interval. End-of-event was defined as ROSC, field termination of resuscitation, or hospital arrival without ROSC, with right censoring of the latter group.

Results: Overall, 9351 patients were included for analysis, of which 63.9% were males. The mean age of participants was 65.3(± 15.5) years and presumed cardiac etiology was present in 82.7% of arrests. An initial shockable rhythm was present in 27.1%, while 29.7% received bystander CPR and 39.7% attained ROSC. The mean pressor-to-ROSC interval was 13.21(± 9.65), 14.86 (± 10.89), and 14.42 (± 10.52) minutes for the intravenous, tibial IO, and humeral IO routes, respectively (p < 0.001). First epinephrine administration via the tibial or humeral IO route was associated with a decreased hazard of ROSC compared to the IV route (HR = 0.78, p < 0.001 and HR = 0.86, p = 0.01 per minute, respectively).

Conclusions: These data suggest that the tibial and humeral IO routes of first epinephrine administration were associated with marginally prolonged resuscitation duration after drug administration and decreasing hazard of ROSC.

院外心脏骤停时,骨内途径与肾上腺素- rosc间期延长有关。
背景:延长复苏时间与不良患者预后相关。虽然旁观者心肺复苏术和早期除颤的重要性是众所周知的,但其他因素对复苏持续时间的影响却不太明确。我们假设与静脉给药相比,首次骨内注射(IO)肾上腺素会延长升压至rosc的时间间隔。目的:探讨肾上腺素首次给药途径与加压至rosc间隔的关系。方法:对2020年ESO数据协作年度研究数据集进行回顾性分析,研究对象是经历过非创伤性、旁观者目睹的逮捕的成年人。采用Cox比例风险模型确定首次肾上腺素给药对加压至rosc时间间隔的影响。事件结束定义为ROSC,现场终止复苏,或无ROSC的医院到达,后一组进行右侧审查。结果:共纳入9351例患者,其中男性占63.9%。参与者的平均年龄为65.3(±15.5)岁,在82.7%的骤停中存在假定的心脏病因。27.1%的患者出现了最初的休克节律,而29.7%的患者接受了旁观者CPR, 39.7%的患者达到了ROSC。静脉、胫骨和肱骨给药途径分别为13.21(±9.65)分钟、14.86(±10.89)分钟和14.42(±10.52)分钟(p)。结论:首次给药的胫骨和肱骨给药途径与给药后复苏时间轻微延长和ROSC危险降低相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Medical Science
Irish Journal of Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Irish Journal of Medical Science is the official organ of the Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. Established in 1832, this quarterly journal is a contribution to medical science and an ideal forum for the younger medical/scientific professional to enter world literature and an ideal launching platform now, as in the past, for many a young research worker. The primary role of both the Academy and IJMS is that of providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information and to promote academic discussion, so essential to scientific progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信