Detrusor Underactivity and Acontractile Bladder Patients Performing Clean Intermittent Catheterization in a Single Tertiary Referral Center: What is Happening in Real Life?

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Karel Dewulf, Alicia Meurice, Thibault Duvillier, Fons Van Isveldt, Wouter Everaerts, Maarten Albersen, Frank Van der Aa, Dirk De Ridder
{"title":"Detrusor Underactivity and Acontractile Bladder Patients Performing Clean Intermittent Catheterization in a Single Tertiary Referral Center: What is Happening in Real Life?","authors":"Karel Dewulf, Alicia Meurice, Thibault Duvillier, Fons Van Isveldt, Wouter Everaerts, Maarten Albersen, Frank Van der Aa, Dirk De Ridder","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06181-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Bladder emptying disorders, caused by detrusor underactivity (DU) and acontractile detrusor (ACD) are frequent conditions, where the focus of treatment is often targeted on minimizing secondary complications by bladder catheterization. If feasible, the preferred method is clean intermittent catheterization (CIC). In this study, we investigate underlying diseases, clinical and urodynamic parameters of a real-life cohort of DU and ACD patients requiring CIC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective chart review of 133 patients performing CIC due to DU or ACD from 2015 to 2020. Demographic, clinical and urodynamic data were extracted for further analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 133 patients included, 74% had ACD. Neurogenic diseases were present in 47% of patients, followed by pelvic surgery (23%) and pharmacotherapy (14%). Persistent need for bladder drainage on the long term was observed in 75% of patients. Of patients who discontinued CIC, 44% had a successful treatment. Sacral neuromodulation was the most frequent successful treatment in 56% of patients. Urine tract infections (UTIs) were present in one third of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this patient cohort needing CIC, ACD was more frequent than DU. Most patients who need CIC for DU or ACD require bladder drainage on the long term. Underlying neurogenic diseases are the most frequent.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06181-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Bladder emptying disorders, caused by detrusor underactivity (DU) and acontractile detrusor (ACD) are frequent conditions, where the focus of treatment is often targeted on minimizing secondary complications by bladder catheterization. If feasible, the preferred method is clean intermittent catheterization (CIC). In this study, we investigate underlying diseases, clinical and urodynamic parameters of a real-life cohort of DU and ACD patients requiring CIC.

Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of 133 patients performing CIC due to DU or ACD from 2015 to 2020. Demographic, clinical and urodynamic data were extracted for further analyses.

Results: Of 133 patients included, 74% had ACD. Neurogenic diseases were present in 47% of patients, followed by pelvic surgery (23%) and pharmacotherapy (14%). Persistent need for bladder drainage on the long term was observed in 75% of patients. Of patients who discontinued CIC, 44% had a successful treatment. Sacral neuromodulation was the most frequent successful treatment in 56% of patients. Urine tract infections (UTIs) were present in one third of patients.

Conclusions: In this patient cohort needing CIC, ACD was more frequent than DU. Most patients who need CIC for DU or ACD require bladder drainage on the long term. Underlying neurogenic diseases are the most frequent.

逼尿肌活动不足和膀胱收缩患者在单一三级转诊中心进行清洁间歇导尿:现实生活中发生了什么?
目的:膀胱排空障碍是由逼尿肌活动不足(DU)和收缩性逼尿肌(ACD)引起的常见疾病,治疗的重点通常是通过膀胱导尿来减少继发性并发症。如果可行,首选的方法是清洁间歇置管(CIC)。在这项研究中,我们调查了一组需要CIC的DU和ACD患者的潜在疾病、临床和尿动力学参数。方法:我们对2015年至2020年因DU或ACD进行CIC的133例患者进行回顾性图表回顾。提取人口学、临床和尿动力学数据作进一步分析。结果:133例患者中,74%发生ACD。47%的患者存在神经源性疾病,其次是骨盆手术(23%)和药物治疗(14%)。75%的患者长期持续需要膀胱引流。在停用CIC的患者中,44%的患者治疗成功。骶骨神经调节是最常见的成功治疗,56%的患者。三分之一的患者存在尿路感染(uti)。结论:在需要CIC的患者队列中,ACD比DU更常见。大多数需要CIC治疗DU或ACD的患者需要长期膀胱引流。潜在的神经源性疾病是最常见的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信