Jose Luis Zamorano, Gabor Vörös, Valeria Calvi, Joaquín Osca, Aurelio Quesada, Kevin Vernooy, Juan Gabriel Martinez, Alexander H Maass, Eyal Nof, Jose Maria Tolosana, Mónica Pardo, Craig Barr, Ignacio Fernández, Jose Luis Merino, Susan Ellery, Enrique Ricoy-Martínez, Giuseppina Belotti, Lea Seidlmayer, Santiago Garcia, Tobias Tönnis, Niall G Campbell, Paul Foley, Johannes Brockmeier, Michael Nürnberg, Ricardo Ruiz-Granell, Frits W Prinzen, Álvaro Lorente-Ros, Alicia Moreno, Mariona Pinart, Mark Ver Heyen, Lieselot Van Erven
{"title":"Sex-specific response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: the BIO|WOMEN trial.","authors":"Jose Luis Zamorano, Gabor Vörös, Valeria Calvi, Joaquín Osca, Aurelio Quesada, Kevin Vernooy, Juan Gabriel Martinez, Alexander H Maass, Eyal Nof, Jose Maria Tolosana, Mónica Pardo, Craig Barr, Ignacio Fernández, Jose Luis Merino, Susan Ellery, Enrique Ricoy-Martínez, Giuseppina Belotti, Lea Seidlmayer, Santiago Garcia, Tobias Tönnis, Niall G Campbell, Paul Foley, Johannes Brockmeier, Michael Nürnberg, Ricardo Ruiz-Granell, Frits W Prinzen, Álvaro Lorente-Ros, Alicia Moreno, Mariona Pinart, Mark Ver Heyen, Lieselot Van Erven","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Variable evidence exists about the efficacy of Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in women vs. men with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and wide QRS complex. Current guidelines, hindered by underrepresentation of women in clinical trials, lack definitive recommendations. The present study was designed to achieve an equal distribution of women and men to prospectively evaluate sex-specific response to CRT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The primary endpoint was the absolute increase in core-lab-assessed LVEF 12 months after de novo implantation of a CRT device. Estimation was adjusted by several baseline confounders to correct sex-specific effect of CRT. Secondary endpoints were further echocardiographic changes including responder rate (LVEF increase ≥5 %); change in NYHA class, 6-min walk distance, quality of life, a clinical composite score (CCS) and the composite of death or HF hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 230 women and 244 men at 25 sites in eight countries. A larger improvement in LVEF (+14.7 % vs. +11.5 %, p ≤ 0.01) in women remained after adjustment for baseline variables (absolute increase attributed to female sex +2.53 %, P = 0.023). Furthermore, a better improvement was observed in reverse remodeling, responder rate (∆LVEF ≥5 %: 83.3 % vs. 70.6 %; p = 0.003), quality of life and HF symptoms in women compared to men. The CCS and the composite of death or HF hospitalization were better in women than in men after CRT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The effect of CRT remained superior in women regarding echocardiographic outcomes even after adjusting for baseline variables. Our results confirm the importance of recognizing sex-specific differences when screening patients for CRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":13710,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"133526"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133526","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Variable evidence exists about the efficacy of Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in women vs. men with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and wide QRS complex. Current guidelines, hindered by underrepresentation of women in clinical trials, lack definitive recommendations. The present study was designed to achieve an equal distribution of women and men to prospectively evaluate sex-specific response to CRT.
Methods: The primary endpoint was the absolute increase in core-lab-assessed LVEF 12 months after de novo implantation of a CRT device. Estimation was adjusted by several baseline confounders to correct sex-specific effect of CRT. Secondary endpoints were further echocardiographic changes including responder rate (LVEF increase ≥5 %); change in NYHA class, 6-min walk distance, quality of life, a clinical composite score (CCS) and the composite of death or HF hospitalization.
Results: We enrolled 230 women and 244 men at 25 sites in eight countries. A larger improvement in LVEF (+14.7 % vs. +11.5 %, p ≤ 0.01) in women remained after adjustment for baseline variables (absolute increase attributed to female sex +2.53 %, P = 0.023). Furthermore, a better improvement was observed in reverse remodeling, responder rate (∆LVEF ≥5 %: 83.3 % vs. 70.6 %; p = 0.003), quality of life and HF symptoms in women compared to men. The CCS and the composite of death or HF hospitalization were better in women than in men after CRT.
Conclusions: The effect of CRT remained superior in women regarding echocardiographic outcomes even after adjusting for baseline variables. Our results confirm the importance of recognizing sex-specific differences when screening patients for CRT.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Cardiology is devoted to cardiology in the broadest sense. Both basic research and clinical papers can be submitted. The journal serves the interest of both practicing clinicians and researchers.
In addition to original papers, we are launching a range of new manuscript types, including Consensus and Position Papers, Systematic Reviews, Meta-analyses, and Short communications. Case reports are no longer acceptable. Controversial techniques, issues on health policy and social medicine are discussed and serve as useful tools for encouraging debate.