A thermal glass bead device provides an effective method of rapid disinfection of suture scissor blades in a veterinary environment.

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Kathryn P Spivey, Steven W Frederick, Meera Surendran Nair, Katrin Saile
{"title":"A thermal glass bead device provides an effective method of rapid disinfection of suture scissor blades in a veterinary environment.","authors":"Kathryn P Spivey, Steven W Frederick, Meera Surendran Nair, Katrin Saile","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.25.04.0123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of glass bead disinfection on suture scissor blades following suture removal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients presented to the surgery department at a private veterinary referral hospital for suture removal from a healed, nongrossly infected skin incision with more than 3 skin sutures from November 2024 through March 2025 were included. Paired pre- and post-glass bead disinfection samples were obtained from the blades of used suture scissors before and after 60-second disinfection with a commercially available glass bead disinfection device. The paired samples were evaluated for bacterial identification, bacterial quantification, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Frequency distributions (proportions) were reported, as appropriate, with 95% binomial exact CIs. Paired proportions were compared with the McNemar exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Suture scissors used on 41 patients (38 dogs and 3 cats) were included in this study. There were 82 (41 paired) cultures performed. Fourteen of 41 predisinfection cultures (34.1%; 95% CI, 20.1% to 50.6%) had bacterial growth. Bacterial growth was not identified on any postdisinfection cultures (0.0%; 95% CI, 0.0% to 8.6%). Staphylococcus spp were the most frequent organisms (9 of 14 [64%]; 95% CI, 35% to 87%), with 4 isolates being a methicillin-resistant subtype.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Glass bead disinfection is a quick and effective means for disinfecting the blades of suture scissors in veterinary practice.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Glass bead disinfection may be a more efficient and cost-effective alternative to true sterilization for lowering the risks of cross-contamination associated with the use of suture scissors in a veterinary setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.25.04.0123","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of glass bead disinfection on suture scissor blades following suture removal.

Methods: Patients presented to the surgery department at a private veterinary referral hospital for suture removal from a healed, nongrossly infected skin incision with more than 3 skin sutures from November 2024 through March 2025 were included. Paired pre- and post-glass bead disinfection samples were obtained from the blades of used suture scissors before and after 60-second disinfection with a commercially available glass bead disinfection device. The paired samples were evaluated for bacterial identification, bacterial quantification, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Frequency distributions (proportions) were reported, as appropriate, with 95% binomial exact CIs. Paired proportions were compared with the McNemar exact test.

Results: Suture scissors used on 41 patients (38 dogs and 3 cats) were included in this study. There were 82 (41 paired) cultures performed. Fourteen of 41 predisinfection cultures (34.1%; 95% CI, 20.1% to 50.6%) had bacterial growth. Bacterial growth was not identified on any postdisinfection cultures (0.0%; 95% CI, 0.0% to 8.6%). Staphylococcus spp were the most frequent organisms (9 of 14 [64%]; 95% CI, 35% to 87%), with 4 isolates being a methicillin-resistant subtype.

Conclusions: Glass bead disinfection is a quick and effective means for disinfecting the blades of suture scissors in veterinary practice.

Clinical relevance: Glass bead disinfection may be a more efficient and cost-effective alternative to true sterilization for lowering the risks of cross-contamination associated with the use of suture scissors in a veterinary setting.

热玻璃珠装置提供了一种在兽医环境中快速消毒缝合剪刀刀片的有效方法。
目的:评价切开缝合后玻璃珠消毒的效果。方法:纳入2024年11月至2025年3月在某私立兽医转诊医院外科接受愈合、非严重感染皮肤切口缝合线拆除手术且缝合线超过3条的患者。用市售的玻璃珠消毒装置消毒60秒前和60秒后,从使用过的缝合剪刀刀片上获得配对的玻璃珠消毒前后样本。对配对样本进行细菌鉴定、细菌定量和抗菌药敏试验。频率分布(比例)报告,适当时,95%的二项精确ci。配对比例与McNemar精确检验比较。结果:41例患者(38只狗和3只猫)使用了缝合剪刀。共进行了82例(41对)培养。41例消毒前培养14例(34.1%);95% CI, 20.1% ~ 50.6%)有细菌生长。消毒后培养物未发现细菌生长(0.0%;95% CI, 0.0%至8.6%)。葡萄球菌(Staphylococcus spp)是最常见的细菌(9 / 14 [64%];95% CI, 35% ~ 87%),其中4株为耐甲氧西林亚型。结论:在兽医实践中,玻璃珠消毒是一种快速有效的缝合剪刀刀片消毒方法。临床意义:玻璃珠消毒可能是一种更有效和更具成本效益的替代真正的灭菌,以降低兽医环境中使用缝合剪刀相关的交叉污染风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信