Kathryn P Spivey, Steven W Frederick, Meera Surendran Nair, Katrin Saile
{"title":"A thermal glass bead device provides an effective method of rapid disinfection of suture scissor blades in a veterinary environment.","authors":"Kathryn P Spivey, Steven W Frederick, Meera Surendran Nair, Katrin Saile","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.25.04.0123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of glass bead disinfection on suture scissor blades following suture removal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients presented to the surgery department at a private veterinary referral hospital for suture removal from a healed, nongrossly infected skin incision with more than 3 skin sutures from November 2024 through March 2025 were included. Paired pre- and post-glass bead disinfection samples were obtained from the blades of used suture scissors before and after 60-second disinfection with a commercially available glass bead disinfection device. The paired samples were evaluated for bacterial identification, bacterial quantification, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Frequency distributions (proportions) were reported, as appropriate, with 95% binomial exact CIs. Paired proportions were compared with the McNemar exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Suture scissors used on 41 patients (38 dogs and 3 cats) were included in this study. There were 82 (41 paired) cultures performed. Fourteen of 41 predisinfection cultures (34.1%; 95% CI, 20.1% to 50.6%) had bacterial growth. Bacterial growth was not identified on any postdisinfection cultures (0.0%; 95% CI, 0.0% to 8.6%). Staphylococcus spp were the most frequent organisms (9 of 14 [64%]; 95% CI, 35% to 87%), with 4 isolates being a methicillin-resistant subtype.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Glass bead disinfection is a quick and effective means for disinfecting the blades of suture scissors in veterinary practice.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Glass bead disinfection may be a more efficient and cost-effective alternative to true sterilization for lowering the risks of cross-contamination associated with the use of suture scissors in a veterinary setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.25.04.0123","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of glass bead disinfection on suture scissor blades following suture removal.
Methods: Patients presented to the surgery department at a private veterinary referral hospital for suture removal from a healed, nongrossly infected skin incision with more than 3 skin sutures from November 2024 through March 2025 were included. Paired pre- and post-glass bead disinfection samples were obtained from the blades of used suture scissors before and after 60-second disinfection with a commercially available glass bead disinfection device. The paired samples were evaluated for bacterial identification, bacterial quantification, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Frequency distributions (proportions) were reported, as appropriate, with 95% binomial exact CIs. Paired proportions were compared with the McNemar exact test.
Results: Suture scissors used on 41 patients (38 dogs and 3 cats) were included in this study. There were 82 (41 paired) cultures performed. Fourteen of 41 predisinfection cultures (34.1%; 95% CI, 20.1% to 50.6%) had bacterial growth. Bacterial growth was not identified on any postdisinfection cultures (0.0%; 95% CI, 0.0% to 8.6%). Staphylococcus spp were the most frequent organisms (9 of 14 [64%]; 95% CI, 35% to 87%), with 4 isolates being a methicillin-resistant subtype.
Conclusions: Glass bead disinfection is a quick and effective means for disinfecting the blades of suture scissors in veterinary practice.
Clinical relevance: Glass bead disinfection may be a more efficient and cost-effective alternative to true sterilization for lowering the risks of cross-contamination associated with the use of suture scissors in a veterinary setting.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.