Filling the Void: The Past, Present, and Future of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Shahbaz A Malik, Aravdeep Jhand, Muhammad Asim Shabbir, Soban Ahmad, Andrew M Goldsweig
{"title":"Filling the Void: The Past, Present, and Future of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.","authors":"Shahbaz A Malik, Aravdeep Jhand, Muhammad Asim Shabbir, Soban Ahmad, Andrew M Goldsweig","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.06.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as an alternative strategy to oral anticoagulation (OAC) to mitigate the risk of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Endovascular LAAO devices were first developed in the early 2000s for patients with relative and absolute contraindications to OAC. Four randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of LAAO procedures, and two LAAO devices have been approved and are commercially available in the United States. Procedural complications, especially pericardial effusion, as well as subsequent peri-device leak and device-related thrombosis have decreased over time due to improved device design and implantation techniques. Many aspects of the LAAO technology continue to evolve. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is used increasingly and offers distinct advantages and disadvantages compared to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for procedural guidance. The role of universal post-procedure surveillance imaging remains unclear. Post-LAAO antithrombotic therapy has shifted from short-term anticoagulation to immediate dual antiplatelet therapy, with ongoing research exploring the feasibility of single antiplatelet therapy. Novel devices with improved design and technology are currently undergoing clinical trials. Additionally, the patient population eligible for LAAO may significantly increase in the coming years, as ongoing trials are evaluating the effectiveness of LAAO devices in a broader population of patients with AF. In conclusion, the history, current state, and active research related to LAAO are summarized in this review article.</p>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.06.011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as an alternative strategy to oral anticoagulation (OAC) to mitigate the risk of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Endovascular LAAO devices were first developed in the early 2000s for patients with relative and absolute contraindications to OAC. Four randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of LAAO procedures, and two LAAO devices have been approved and are commercially available in the United States. Procedural complications, especially pericardial effusion, as well as subsequent peri-device leak and device-related thrombosis have decreased over time due to improved device design and implantation techniques. Many aspects of the LAAO technology continue to evolve. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is used increasingly and offers distinct advantages and disadvantages compared to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for procedural guidance. The role of universal post-procedure surveillance imaging remains unclear. Post-LAAO antithrombotic therapy has shifted from short-term anticoagulation to immediate dual antiplatelet therapy, with ongoing research exploring the feasibility of single antiplatelet therapy. Novel devices with improved design and technology are currently undergoing clinical trials. Additionally, the patient population eligible for LAAO may significantly increase in the coming years, as ongoing trials are evaluating the effectiveness of LAAO devices in a broader population of patients with AF. In conclusion, the history, current state, and active research related to LAAO are summarized in this review article.

填补空白:左心耳闭塞的过去、现在和未来。
左心房附件闭塞(LAAO)已成为口服抗凝(OAC)的替代策略,以减轻心房颤动(AF)患者血栓栓塞事件的风险。血管内LAAO装置最早是在21世纪初开发的,用于有相对和绝对OAC禁忌症的患者。四项随机对照试验证明了LAAO程序的安全性和有效性,两种LAAO设备已被批准并在美国上市。手术并发症,特别是心包积液,以及随后的装置周围泄漏和装置相关血栓形成随着时间的推移,由于改进的装置设计和植入技术而减少。LAAO技术的许多方面还在继续发展。与经食管超声心动图(TEE)相比,心内超声心动图(ICE)在手术指导方面的应用越来越广泛,具有明显的优点和缺点。普遍的术后监测成像的作用尚不清楚。laao后抗血栓治疗已从短期抗凝转向立即双重抗血小板治疗,目前正在研究单一抗血小板治疗的可行性。改进设计和技术的新型设备目前正在进行临床试验。此外,由于正在进行的试验正在评估LAAO装置在更广泛的房颤患者群体中的有效性,未来几年符合LAAO条件的患者群体可能会显著增加。总之,本文总结了LAAO的历史、现状和正在进行的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Cardiology
American Journal of Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
698
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信