Optimization of Na2O and Activator modulus to produce sustainable ground pond ash and GGBS-based geopolymer concrete.

IF 5.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Vidyadhara V, Ranganath R V, Varsha B N
{"title":"Optimization of Na<sub>2</sub>O and Activator modulus to produce sustainable ground pond ash and GGBS-based geopolymer concrete.","authors":"Vidyadhara V, Ranganath R V, Varsha B N","doi":"10.1007/s11356-025-36652-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Construction industry is progressively seeking sustainable approaches to reduce its environmental footprint. Due to the large volume of concrete consumption, there is extensive focus on enhancing its engineering properties without neglecting the sustainability concerns. In the present work, an attempt has been made to produce geopolymer concrete with industrial by-products. Grinding treatment was carried out to improve the reactivity of the as-received/unprocessed pond ash (UPA), and the output was ground pond ash (GPA). A combination of GPA and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) in the ratio of 70:30 was used as binders in the production of geopolymer concrete (GPC). Furthermore, due to the sustainability factor, UPA was incorporated as a complete replacement for fine aggregate. Sodium hydroxide (NH) and sodium silicate (NS) were used as alkaline activators. In the GPC binder, Na<sub>2</sub>O% and activator modulus (AM), i.e., SiO<sub>2</sub>/Na<sub>2</sub>O, play a vital role in deciding the degree of polymerization. Thus, two binder contents, namely 500 kg/m<sup>3</sup> and 550 kg/m<sup>3</sup>, were used. Two variations of Na<sub>2</sub>O content, namely 5% and 7.5% of binder, have been included. Three AM values-1, 1.5, and 2-were used to prepare concrete samples. Compressive strength and flexural strength of GPC were evaluated. Microstructural properties using scanning electron microscope (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared radiation (FTIR), thermo gravimetric analysis (TGA), and differential thermal analysis (DTA) have been explored in the present study. Cost and embodied energy analysis were also carried out. Strength results indicated that AM of 2 yielded high early strength due to the rapid setting caused by the reaction between GGBS and the readily available higher proportion of SiO<sub>2</sub> in NS. In later stages, it was observed that the AM of 1.5 yielded higher strength because of the synergy in the reaction between GPA and GGBS in combination with alkaline solutions. Furthermore, increased Na<sub>2</sub>O from 5% to 7.5% enhanced the strength by improving the dissolution of aluminosilicates from GPA and GGBS. Among all the combinations, 550, 7.5, 1 mix yielded the highest compressive strength of 42.91 MPa at 28 days. Also, the same combination 550, 7.5, 1, consumed the lowest cost of 205 INR for unit compressive strength production. The combination 500, 5, 1.5 consumed the lowest embodied energy of 40 MJ per unit compressive strength production. However, the results of the mechanical properties, cost analysis, embodied energy analysis, and microstructural studies substantiate that mix with the combination of 550, 7.5, 1 serves as an optimized blend of binder content, Na<sub>2</sub>O, and AM for sustainable production of GPA and GGBS-based GPC.</p>","PeriodicalId":545,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-025-36652-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Construction industry is progressively seeking sustainable approaches to reduce its environmental footprint. Due to the large volume of concrete consumption, there is extensive focus on enhancing its engineering properties without neglecting the sustainability concerns. In the present work, an attempt has been made to produce geopolymer concrete with industrial by-products. Grinding treatment was carried out to improve the reactivity of the as-received/unprocessed pond ash (UPA), and the output was ground pond ash (GPA). A combination of GPA and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) in the ratio of 70:30 was used as binders in the production of geopolymer concrete (GPC). Furthermore, due to the sustainability factor, UPA was incorporated as a complete replacement for fine aggregate. Sodium hydroxide (NH) and sodium silicate (NS) were used as alkaline activators. In the GPC binder, Na2O% and activator modulus (AM), i.e., SiO2/Na2O, play a vital role in deciding the degree of polymerization. Thus, two binder contents, namely 500 kg/m3 and 550 kg/m3, were used. Two variations of Na2O content, namely 5% and 7.5% of binder, have been included. Three AM values-1, 1.5, and 2-were used to prepare concrete samples. Compressive strength and flexural strength of GPC were evaluated. Microstructural properties using scanning electron microscope (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared radiation (FTIR), thermo gravimetric analysis (TGA), and differential thermal analysis (DTA) have been explored in the present study. Cost and embodied energy analysis were also carried out. Strength results indicated that AM of 2 yielded high early strength due to the rapid setting caused by the reaction between GGBS and the readily available higher proportion of SiO2 in NS. In later stages, it was observed that the AM of 1.5 yielded higher strength because of the synergy in the reaction between GPA and GGBS in combination with alkaline solutions. Furthermore, increased Na2O from 5% to 7.5% enhanced the strength by improving the dissolution of aluminosilicates from GPA and GGBS. Among all the combinations, 550, 7.5, 1 mix yielded the highest compressive strength of 42.91 MPa at 28 days. Also, the same combination 550, 7.5, 1, consumed the lowest cost of 205 INR for unit compressive strength production. The combination 500, 5, 1.5 consumed the lowest embodied energy of 40 MJ per unit compressive strength production. However, the results of the mechanical properties, cost analysis, embodied energy analysis, and microstructural studies substantiate that mix with the combination of 550, 7.5, 1 serves as an optimized blend of binder content, Na2O, and AM for sustainable production of GPA and GGBS-based GPC.

Na2O和活化剂模量的优化制备可持续地塘灰和ggbs基地聚合物混凝土。
建筑业正在逐步寻求可持续的方法来减少其对环境的影响。由于混凝土消耗量大,人们广泛关注在不忽视可持续性问题的情况下提高其工程性能。本文尝试用工业副产品生产地聚合物混凝土。为提高接收/未处理池灰(UPA)的反应性,对其进行磨矿处理,产出磨矿池灰(GPA)。将GPA与矿渣(GGBS)按70:30的比例配制成粘结剂,用于生产地聚合物混凝土(GPC)。此外,由于可持续性因素,UPA被纳入作为细骨料的完全替代品。采用氢氧化钠(NH)和硅酸钠(NS)作为碱性活化剂。在GPC粘结剂中,Na2O%和活化剂模量(AM),即SiO2/Na2O,是决定聚合程度的重要因素。因此,使用两种粘结剂含量,即500 kg/m3和550 kg/m3。Na2O含量的两种变化,即粘合剂的5%和7.5%。三个AM值- 1,1.5和2-用于制备混凝土样品。对GPC的抗压强度和抗折强度进行了评价。利用扫描电镜(SEM)、x射线衍射(XRD)、傅里叶变换红外辐射(FTIR)、热重分析(TGA)和差热分析(DTA)对其微观结构进行了研究。并进行了成本分析和蕴含能分析。强度结果表明,由于GGBS与NS中易于获得的较高SiO2比例的反应导致AM 2的快速凝固,AM 2产生了较高的早期强度。在后期,我们观察到,由于GPA和GGBS与碱性溶液的协同作用,1.5 AM产生了更高的强度。当Na2O由5%增加到7.5%时,GPA和GGBS中硅铝酸盐的溶解能力增强。其中,550,7.5和1混合的28 d抗压强度最高,达到42.91 MPa。同样的组合550、7.5、1,单位抗压强度生产成本最低,为205 INR。500、5、1.5组合单位抗压强度生产的蕴含能最低,为40 MJ。然而,力学性能、成本分析、隐含能量分析和微观结构研究的结果证实,550,7.5,1的混合物可以作为粘合剂含量、Na2O和AM的最佳混合物,用于可持续生产GPA和基于ggbs的GPC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
6549
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science and Pollution Research (ESPR) serves the international community in all areas of Environmental Science and related subjects with emphasis on chemical compounds. This includes: - Terrestrial Biology and Ecology - Aquatic Biology and Ecology - Atmospheric Chemistry - Environmental Microbiology/Biobased Energy Sources - Phytoremediation and Ecosystem Restoration - Environmental Analyses and Monitoring - Assessment of Risks and Interactions of Pollutants in the Environment - Conservation Biology and Sustainable Agriculture - Impact of Chemicals/Pollutants on Human and Animal Health It reports from a broad interdisciplinary outlook.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信