Co-Production and Implementation of ‘Count Me In’: A Bottom-Up Approach to Inclusive Research and Participation in a National Health Service in England

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Oladayo Bifarin, Jahanara Miah, Michelle Harvey, Gail Faragher, Jade Thai, Dennis Dewar, Jenny Garden, Lindsey Nicholson, Nicola Wilson, Nusrat Husain, Dan W. Joyce
{"title":"Co-Production and Implementation of ‘Count Me In’: A Bottom-Up Approach to Inclusive Research and Participation in a National Health Service in England","authors":"Oladayo Bifarin,&nbsp;Jahanara Miah,&nbsp;Michelle Harvey,&nbsp;Gail Faragher,&nbsp;Jade Thai,&nbsp;Dennis Dewar,&nbsp;Jenny Garden,&nbsp;Lindsey Nicholson,&nbsp;Nicola Wilson,&nbsp;Nusrat Husain,&nbsp;Dan W. Joyce","doi":"10.1111/hex.70326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Research-active National Health Service (NHS) services are linked to better care quality and health outcomes. However, traditional research participant recruitment methods, such as ‘opt-in’ strategies, often face challenges in reaching diverse populations. The ‘Count Me In’ (CMI) system was introduced to address these barriers through an ‘opt-out’ model, aiming to normalise research participation and promote inclusivity. At Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, a bottom-up approach was employed to adapt CMI, ensuring meaningful engagement with service users, carers and communities in its design and implementation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>CMI was co-produced with stakeholders through a series of workshops, discussion groups and consultations with over 300 participants, including service users, carers and NHS staff. Key activities included listening exercises to understand concerns, co-designing campaign materials and forming a Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) Advisory Group. The group provided ongoing guidance to ensure that the system aligned with the needs of underserved communities and upheld ethical and cultural sensitivity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Stakeholders widely supported the ‘opt-out’ approach, recognising its potential to improve research inclusivity. Participants highlighted the importance of clear communication, cultural sensitivity and robust data protection measures. Specific research priorities, such as mental health and social isolation, were identified. Co-produced materials, including plain-language guides and culturally appropriate visuals, addressed concerns about privacy, stigma and accessibility, fostering trust and confidence in the system.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The CMI system is an acceptable and scalable model for inclusive research recruitment, embedding research into routine care. The bottom-up approach ensured the system was tailored to local needs, promoting equity and accessibility.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient and Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>A partnership approach working with PPIE leads at the Mental Health Research for Innovation Centre (M-RIC) ensured that service users, carers and community members shaped the CMI system through extensive co-production activities. The development of the system, therefore, reflected their lived experiences and priorities, thereby enhancing its inclusivity and impact.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"28 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70326","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70326","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Research-active National Health Service (NHS) services are linked to better care quality and health outcomes. However, traditional research participant recruitment methods, such as ‘opt-in’ strategies, often face challenges in reaching diverse populations. The ‘Count Me In’ (CMI) system was introduced to address these barriers through an ‘opt-out’ model, aiming to normalise research participation and promote inclusivity. At Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, a bottom-up approach was employed to adapt CMI, ensuring meaningful engagement with service users, carers and communities in its design and implementation.

Methods

CMI was co-produced with stakeholders through a series of workshops, discussion groups and consultations with over 300 participants, including service users, carers and NHS staff. Key activities included listening exercises to understand concerns, co-designing campaign materials and forming a Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) Advisory Group. The group provided ongoing guidance to ensure that the system aligned with the needs of underserved communities and upheld ethical and cultural sensitivity.

Findings

Stakeholders widely supported the ‘opt-out’ approach, recognising its potential to improve research inclusivity. Participants highlighted the importance of clear communication, cultural sensitivity and robust data protection measures. Specific research priorities, such as mental health and social isolation, were identified. Co-produced materials, including plain-language guides and culturally appropriate visuals, addressed concerns about privacy, stigma and accessibility, fostering trust and confidence in the system.

Conclusion

The CMI system is an acceptable and scalable model for inclusive research recruitment, embedding research into routine care. The bottom-up approach ensured the system was tailored to local needs, promoting equity and accessibility.

Patient and Public Contribution

A partnership approach working with PPIE leads at the Mental Health Research for Innovation Centre (M-RIC) ensured that service users, carers and community members shaped the CMI system through extensive co-production activities. The development of the system, therefore, reflected their lived experiences and priorities, thereby enhancing its inclusivity and impact.

“算我一份”的联合制作和实施:一种自下而上的方法,以包容性研究和参与英国国家卫生服务
背景研究活跃的国民健康服务(NHS)服务与更好的护理质量和健康结果有关。然而,传统的研究参与者招募方法,如“选择加入”策略,在接触不同的人群时往往面临挑战。引入“算上我”(CMI)系统是为了通过“选择退出”模式解决这些障碍,旨在使研究参与正常化并促进包容性。在Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust,采用自下而上的方法来适应CMI,确保在设计和实施过程中与服务用户、护理人员和社区进行有意义的接触。方法CMI与利益相关者通过一系列研讨会、讨论小组和咨询300多名参与者(包括服务使用者、护理人员和NHS工作人员)共同制作。主要活动包括倾听练习,以了解关注的问题,共同设计宣传材料,组建患者和公众参与和参与咨询小组。该小组提供了持续的指导,以确保该系统符合服务不足社区的需求,并保持道德和文化敏感性。利益相关者广泛支持“选择退出”方法,认识到其提高研究包容性的潜力。与会者强调了明确沟通、文化敏感性和强有力的数据保护措施的重要性。确定了具体的研究重点,如心理健康和社会孤立。共同制作的材料,包括通俗易懂的语言指南和文化上适当的视觉效果,解决了对隐私、耻辱和可及性的担忧,促进了对该系统的信任和信心。结论CMI系统是一种可接受的、可扩展的包容性研究招募模式,可将研究纳入日常护理。自下而上的方法确保该系统适合当地需要,促进公平和无障碍。患者和公众的贡献与精神卫生创新研究中心(M-RIC)的公私合作伙伴关系方法确保服务使用者、护理人员和社区成员通过广泛的合作生产活动塑造了精神卫生创新系统。因此,该系统的发展反映了他们的生活经历和优先事项,从而增强了其包容性和影响力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信