Efficacy and Safety of Multihole Partially Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stents for Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

IF 1.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
DEN open Pub Date : 2025-06-22 DOI:10.1002/deo2.70168
Kengo Matsumoto, Kazuhide Iwasa, Asuka Watanabe, Hiroki Takiyama, Satoru Okabe, Naoto Osugi, Dai Nakamatsu, Masashi Yamamoto, Shiro Hayashi, Koji Fukui, Tsutomu Nishida
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Multihole Partially Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stents for Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Single-Center Retrospective Study","authors":"Kengo Matsumoto,&nbsp;Kazuhide Iwasa,&nbsp;Asuka Watanabe,&nbsp;Hiroki Takiyama,&nbsp;Satoru Okabe,&nbsp;Naoto Osugi,&nbsp;Dai Nakamatsu,&nbsp;Masashi Yamamoto,&nbsp;Shiro Hayashi,&nbsp;Koji Fukui,&nbsp;Tsutomu Nishida","doi":"10.1002/deo2.70168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Covered self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) are the standard for managing unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO), as they prolong the time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO). However, fully covered SEMS (FCSEMS) increases the risk of cholecystitis and pancreatitis. This exploratory study evaluated a novel multihole partially covered SEMS (MHSEMS) designed to reduce these risks.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The clinical data of 26 DMBO patients treated with MHSEMSs were retrospectively compared with those of 63 patients treated with FCSEMSs between April 2018 and October 2024. The outcomes included clinical success, early complications, and recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The baseline characteristics, including age (median 78 years), sex distribution (55.2% vs. 57.7% male), BMI (20.5 vs. 19.8), tumor size (27 mm vs. 30 mm), and stricture length (20 mm vs. 19.5 mm), were comparable between the groups. Procedural factors, including initial papillary cannulation (34.9% vs. 26.9%) and pancreatography (12.9% vs. 15.4%), were also similar in terms of incidence. Early complications were less common in the MHSEMS group (7.7% vs. 23.8%), with no cases of cholecystitis observed. Fewer early complications were observed with MHSEMS, suggesting potential clinical benefits. The RBO rates (7.7% vs. 15.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.28) and median TRBO (151 vs. 141.5 days, <i>p</i> = 0.87) were also comparable.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Although the differences in outcomes were not statistically significant, the incidence of early complications was lower, especially for cholecystitis, with the MHSEMS in the management of DMBO. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these preliminary findings.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93973,"journal":{"name":"DEN open","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/deo2.70168","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEN open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Covered self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) are the standard for managing unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO), as they prolong the time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO). However, fully covered SEMS (FCSEMS) increases the risk of cholecystitis and pancreatitis. This exploratory study evaluated a novel multihole partially covered SEMS (MHSEMS) designed to reduce these risks.

Methods

The clinical data of 26 DMBO patients treated with MHSEMSs were retrospectively compared with those of 63 patients treated with FCSEMSs between April 2018 and October 2024. The outcomes included clinical success, early complications, and recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO).

Results

The baseline characteristics, including age (median 78 years), sex distribution (55.2% vs. 57.7% male), BMI (20.5 vs. 19.8), tumor size (27 mm vs. 30 mm), and stricture length (20 mm vs. 19.5 mm), were comparable between the groups. Procedural factors, including initial papillary cannulation (34.9% vs. 26.9%) and pancreatography (12.9% vs. 15.4%), were also similar in terms of incidence. Early complications were less common in the MHSEMS group (7.7% vs. 23.8%), with no cases of cholecystitis observed. Fewer early complications were observed with MHSEMS, suggesting potential clinical benefits. The RBO rates (7.7% vs. 15.9%, p = 0.28) and median TRBO (151 vs. 141.5 days, p = 0.87) were also comparable.

Conclusion

Although the differences in outcomes were not statistically significant, the incidence of early complications was lower, especially for cholecystitis, with the MHSEMS in the management of DMBO. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these preliminary findings.

多孔部分覆盖自膨胀金属支架治疗远端恶性胆道梗阻的有效性和安全性:一项单中心回顾性研究
有盖自膨胀金属支架(SEMS)是治疗不可切除的远端恶性胆道梗阻(DMBO)的标准,因为它们延长了复发性胆道梗阻(TRBO)的时间。然而,完全覆盖的SEMS (fcems)增加了胆囊炎和胰腺炎的风险。这项探索性研究评估了一种新型的多孔部分覆盖式SEMS (mshsems),旨在降低这些风险。方法回顾性分析2018年4月至2024年10月26例采用MHSEMSs治疗的DMBO患者的临床资料,并与63例采用FCSEMSs治疗的患者进行比较。结果包括临床成功、早期并发症和复发性胆道梗阻(RBO)。结果基线特征,包括年龄(中位78岁)、性别分布(55.2%对57.7%男性)、BMI(20.5对19.8)、肿瘤大小(27mm对30mm)和狭窄长度(20mm对19.5 mm),组间具有可比性。手术因素,包括初始乳头状插管(34.9% vs. 26.9%)和胰腺造影(12.9% vs. 15.4%),在发病率方面也相似。MHSEMS组早期并发症较少见(7.7% vs. 23.8%),无胆囊炎病例。MHSEMS的早期并发症较少,提示潜在的临床益处。RBO率(7.7% vs 15.9%, p = 0.28)和中位TRBO (151 vs 141.5天,p = 0.87)也具有可比性。结论虽然结果差异无统计学意义,但MHSEMS治疗DMBO的早期并发症发生率较低,尤其是胆囊炎。需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来证实这些初步发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信