Mechanistic Insights: Correspondence on “Tuning Co-Operative Energy Transfer in Copper(I) Complexes Using Two-Photon Absorbing Diimine-Based Ligand Sensitizers”
Julian A. Moghtader, Dr. Maria-Sophie Bertrams, Dr. Dieter Schollmeyer, Prof. Dr. Christoph Kerzig
{"title":"Mechanistic Insights: Correspondence on “Tuning Co-Operative Energy Transfer in Copper(I) Complexes Using Two-Photon Absorbing Diimine-Based Ligand Sensitizers”","authors":"Julian A. Moghtader, Dr. Maria-Sophie Bertrams, Dr. Dieter Schollmeyer, Prof. Dr. Christoph Kerzig","doi":"10.1002/ange.202509203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In a recent communication, Collins and coworkers presented a Cu(I) complex with photocatalytic activity under red light LED conditions, mainly for singlet oxygen-driven reactions. Guided by steady-state emission measurements with 800 nm excitation, the authors suggested that the underlying mechanism for the generation of the photoexcited key species is a simultaneous two-photon absorption via a virtual state. However, such a mechanism requires pulsed laser excitation and cannot compete when a conventional one-photon excitation is also feasible with the selected excitation wavelength range. Using several spectroscopic techniques and reactivity assays under different light color and intensity conditions, we unambiguously demonstrate that a conventional one-photon excitation followed by rather inefficient singlet oxygen generation (quantum yield <5%) is responsible for the observed photoreactivity of the Cu(I) complex. In addition, we briefly summarize general mechanistic considerations, estimate typical photon densities required for a variety of two-photon mechanisms, highlight the importance of optical filters and impurities to avoid artifacts in the emission spectra, and present some guidelines for the differentiation between one- and two-photon mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":7803,"journal":{"name":"Angewandte Chemie","volume":"137 26","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Angewandte Chemie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ange.202509203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In a recent communication, Collins and coworkers presented a Cu(I) complex with photocatalytic activity under red light LED conditions, mainly for singlet oxygen-driven reactions. Guided by steady-state emission measurements with 800 nm excitation, the authors suggested that the underlying mechanism for the generation of the photoexcited key species is a simultaneous two-photon absorption via a virtual state. However, such a mechanism requires pulsed laser excitation and cannot compete when a conventional one-photon excitation is also feasible with the selected excitation wavelength range. Using several spectroscopic techniques and reactivity assays under different light color and intensity conditions, we unambiguously demonstrate that a conventional one-photon excitation followed by rather inefficient singlet oxygen generation (quantum yield <5%) is responsible for the observed photoreactivity of the Cu(I) complex. In addition, we briefly summarize general mechanistic considerations, estimate typical photon densities required for a variety of two-photon mechanisms, highlight the importance of optical filters and impurities to avoid artifacts in the emission spectra, and present some guidelines for the differentiation between one- and two-photon mechanisms.