Comparative analysis of deep learning and machine learning models for one-day-ahead streamflow forecasting in the Krishna River basin

IF 4.7 2区 地球科学 Q1 WATER RESOURCES
Sukhsehaj Kaur, Sagar Rohidas Chavan
{"title":"Comparative analysis of deep learning and machine learning models for one-day-ahead streamflow forecasting in the Krishna River basin","authors":"Sukhsehaj Kaur,&nbsp;Sagar Rohidas Chavan","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study region</h3><div>Karad, Keesara, Sarati and T.Ramapuram catchments located in the Krishna River basin, India</div></div><div><h3>Study focus</h3><div>This study focused on 1-day ahead streamflow forecasting in four distinct catchments using a wide array of Deep Learning (DL) and Machine Learning (ML) models. A comprehensive evaluation of eleven models was conducted to assess their strengths and limitations across different datasets.</div></div><div><h3>New hydrological insights</h3><div>The study implemented Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Bidirectional LSTM (Bi-LSTM), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), Bidirectional GRU, Convolutional Neural Network, WaveNet, K-Nearest Neighbours, Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Regression, Adaptive Boosting, and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) to forecast streamflow at each site. Lagged precipitation and antecedent streamflow emerged as key predictors. Model performance was assessed using multiple evaluation metrics and visualization techniques. Bi-LSTM achieved the highest performance in three catchments with Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) of 0.864 in Karad, 0.708 in Keesara, and 0.702 in T. Ramapuram, while GRU performed best in Sarati with NSE close to 0.7. The best model achieved \"very good\" accuracy in one catchment and \"good\" in three, as indicated by performance metrics. However, even the best-performing DL models struggled to capture peak flow events, revealing limitations in extrapolation. The study also highlights the potential of ML models based on ensemble techniques, such as RF and XGBoost, which demonstrated performance comparable to that of complex DL architectures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies","volume":"60 ","pages":"Article 102549"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221458182500374X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study region

Karad, Keesara, Sarati and T.Ramapuram catchments located in the Krishna River basin, India

Study focus

This study focused on 1-day ahead streamflow forecasting in four distinct catchments using a wide array of Deep Learning (DL) and Machine Learning (ML) models. A comprehensive evaluation of eleven models was conducted to assess their strengths and limitations across different datasets.

New hydrological insights

The study implemented Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Bidirectional LSTM (Bi-LSTM), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), Bidirectional GRU, Convolutional Neural Network, WaveNet, K-Nearest Neighbours, Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Regression, Adaptive Boosting, and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) to forecast streamflow at each site. Lagged precipitation and antecedent streamflow emerged as key predictors. Model performance was assessed using multiple evaluation metrics and visualization techniques. Bi-LSTM achieved the highest performance in three catchments with Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) of 0.864 in Karad, 0.708 in Keesara, and 0.702 in T. Ramapuram, while GRU performed best in Sarati with NSE close to 0.7. The best model achieved "very good" accuracy in one catchment and "good" in three, as indicated by performance metrics. However, even the best-performing DL models struggled to capture peak flow events, revealing limitations in extrapolation. The study also highlights the potential of ML models based on ensemble techniques, such as RF and XGBoost, which demonstrated performance comparable to that of complex DL architectures.
深度学习与机器学习模型在克里希纳河流域一日流量预报中的对比分析
研究区域位于印度Krishna河流域的karad、Keesara、Sarati和T.Ramapuram集水区研究重点本研究重点是使用广泛的深度学习(DL)和机器学习(ML)模型对四个不同集水区的1天前流量进行预测。对11个模型进行了综合评估,以评估它们在不同数据集上的优势和局限性。该研究利用长短期记忆(LSTM)、双向LSTM (Bi-LSTM)、门控循环单元(GRU)、双向GRU、卷积神经网络、WaveNet、k近邻、随机森林(RF)、支持向量回归、自适应增强和极端梯度增强(XGBoost)来预测每个站点的流量。滞后降水和之前的水流成为关键的预测因子。使用多种评价指标和可视化技术评估模型性能。Bi-LSTM在Karad、Keesara和T. Ramapuram的纳什-苏特克利夫效率(NSE)分别为0.864、0.708和0.702,而GRU在Sarati的表现最好,NSE接近0.7。正如性能指标所示,最好的模型在一个集水区实现了“非常好”的准确性,在三个集水区实现了“良好”的准确性。然而,即使是表现最好的深度学习模型也很难捕捉到高峰流量事件,这表明了外推的局限性。该研究还强调了基于集成技术(如RF和XGBoost)的机器学习模型的潜力,其性能可与复杂的深度学习架构相媲美。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies
Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
284
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies publishes original research papers enhancing the science of hydrology and aiming at region-specific problems, past and future conditions, analysis, review and solutions. The journal particularly welcomes research papers that deliver new insights into region-specific hydrological processes and responses to changing conditions, as well as contributions that incorporate interdisciplinarity and translational science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信