{"title":"Seasonal distribution and removal efficiency of microplastics in landfill leachate treatment plants in Istanbul, Turkiye","authors":"Narin Kara, Hanife Sari Erkan","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2025.107451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Due to inadequate management, plastic waste accumulates in landfills and transforms into microplastics (MPs), which concentrate in leachate and pose risks to ecosystems and human health. This study examines the seasonal variation, size, type, and removability of MPs in leachate from the Kömürcüoda (LTP-1) and Odayeri (LTP-2) landfill leachate treatment plants in Istanbul. Seasonal samples from raw leachate (RL), membrane bioreactor (MBR), ultrafiltration (UF), nanofiltration (NF), and nanofiltration concentrate (NFC) units were analyzed in spring and autumn. The highest MP concentrations were found in MBR units, with 29 particles/L in autumn and 11 particles/L in spring at LTP-1. In LTP-2, MP concentrations in anoxic and aerobic units were 20 and 24 particles/L in autumn and 17 and 26 particles/L in spring. Significant MP reduction was observed in UF and NF outlets, with an MP removal efficiency of approximately 97 % between RL and NF units at both sites. The predominant MPs were blue, black, and transparent fibers, ranging from 500 to 1999 µm in autumn and 1000 to >2000 µm in spring. Polymeric analysis identified polyamide (PA) as the most prevalent material at LTP-1 (42 %), followed by polypropylene (PP) and polyisoprene (PI), while at LTP-2, PP was dominant (46 %), followed by polyethylene (PE), PI, and PA. Despite high removal efficiencies, daily MP release after treatment was estimated at 5 × 10⁵ and 13 × 10⁵ particles for LTP-1 and LTP-2, respectively, indicating continued MP discharge. The high number of MPs detected in untreated landfill leachate, along with their persistence even after treatment processes, highlights the potential accumulation and toxicity risks posed by MPs released into aquatic ecosystems. Further research should focus on understanding the long-term environmental behaviour of these pollutants in receiving environments, as well as on improving advanced treatment technologies for MP removal.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 107451"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582025007189","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Due to inadequate management, plastic waste accumulates in landfills and transforms into microplastics (MPs), which concentrate in leachate and pose risks to ecosystems and human health. This study examines the seasonal variation, size, type, and removability of MPs in leachate from the Kömürcüoda (LTP-1) and Odayeri (LTP-2) landfill leachate treatment plants in Istanbul. Seasonal samples from raw leachate (RL), membrane bioreactor (MBR), ultrafiltration (UF), nanofiltration (NF), and nanofiltration concentrate (NFC) units were analyzed in spring and autumn. The highest MP concentrations were found in MBR units, with 29 particles/L in autumn and 11 particles/L in spring at LTP-1. In LTP-2, MP concentrations in anoxic and aerobic units were 20 and 24 particles/L in autumn and 17 and 26 particles/L in spring. Significant MP reduction was observed in UF and NF outlets, with an MP removal efficiency of approximately 97 % between RL and NF units at both sites. The predominant MPs were blue, black, and transparent fibers, ranging from 500 to 1999 µm in autumn and 1000 to >2000 µm in spring. Polymeric analysis identified polyamide (PA) as the most prevalent material at LTP-1 (42 %), followed by polypropylene (PP) and polyisoprene (PI), while at LTP-2, PP was dominant (46 %), followed by polyethylene (PE), PI, and PA. Despite high removal efficiencies, daily MP release after treatment was estimated at 5 × 10⁵ and 13 × 10⁵ particles for LTP-1 and LTP-2, respectively, indicating continued MP discharge. The high number of MPs detected in untreated landfill leachate, along with their persistence even after treatment processes, highlights the potential accumulation and toxicity risks posed by MPs released into aquatic ecosystems. Further research should focus on understanding the long-term environmental behaviour of these pollutants in receiving environments, as well as on improving advanced treatment technologies for MP removal.
期刊介绍:
The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice.
PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers.
PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.