Hongbing Song, Xiong Yang, Yao Chen, Guangdong Ma, Zhifeng Li, Sheng Wang, Changli Ruan, Xiangpan Li
{"title":"Impact of nuclear cross-section libraries on neutron beam quality and dose distribution in accelerator-based BNCT: a full-process Monte Carlo study","authors":"Hongbing Song, Xiong Yang, Yao Chen, Guangdong Ma, Zhifeng Li, Sheng Wang, Changli Ruan, Xiangpan Li","doi":"10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.113099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work presents a full-process Monte Carlo investigation of how evaluated nuclear cross-section libraries influence neutron beam characteristics and dose distribution in accelerator-based boron neutron capture therapy. Simulations were performed using PHITS with three representative combinations of proton, neutron, photon, and thermal scattering data derived from ENDF/B-VII.1, ENDF/B-VIII.0, and JENDL-5.0. The modeling sequence includes proton–lithium neutron production, moderation and filtering in a beam shaping assembly, and dose deposition in both a homogeneous soft-tissue-equivalent phantom and a voxelized adult female head phantom based on ICRP 110. The results reveal that variations in nuclear data, particularly for the <ce:sup loc=\"pre\">7</ce:sup>Li(p,n)<ce:sup loc=\"post\">7</ce:sup>Be reaction, lead to significant differences in neutron spectra, epithermal flux, and dose-related quantities. Key clinical metrics such as advantage depth dose rate and treatment time show deviations of up to 13%, highlighting the propagation of nuclear data uncertainty from source modeling to final dose estimation. This study demonstrates how nuclear data selection can affect both beam design and dose estimation accuracy, emphasizing the need for careful cross-section library consideration in simulation-based beamline development and validation.","PeriodicalId":20861,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.113099","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This work presents a full-process Monte Carlo investigation of how evaluated nuclear cross-section libraries influence neutron beam characteristics and dose distribution in accelerator-based boron neutron capture therapy. Simulations were performed using PHITS with three representative combinations of proton, neutron, photon, and thermal scattering data derived from ENDF/B-VII.1, ENDF/B-VIII.0, and JENDL-5.0. The modeling sequence includes proton–lithium neutron production, moderation and filtering in a beam shaping assembly, and dose deposition in both a homogeneous soft-tissue-equivalent phantom and a voxelized adult female head phantom based on ICRP 110. The results reveal that variations in nuclear data, particularly for the 7Li(p,n)7Be reaction, lead to significant differences in neutron spectra, epithermal flux, and dose-related quantities. Key clinical metrics such as advantage depth dose rate and treatment time show deviations of up to 13%, highlighting the propagation of nuclear data uncertainty from source modeling to final dose estimation. This study demonstrates how nuclear data selection can affect both beam design and dose estimation accuracy, emphasizing the need for careful cross-section library consideration in simulation-based beamline development and validation.
期刊介绍:
Radiation Physics and Chemistry is a multidisciplinary journal that provides a medium for publication of substantial and original papers, reviews, and short communications which focus on research and developments involving ionizing radiation in radiation physics, radiation chemistry and radiation processing.
The journal aims to publish papers with significance to an international audience, containing substantial novelty and scientific impact. The Editors reserve the rights to reject, with or without external review, papers that do not meet these criteria. This could include papers that are very similar to previous publications, only with changed target substrates, employed materials, analyzed sites and experimental methods, report results without presenting new insights and/or hypothesis testing, or do not focus on the radiation effects.