Farrah Raza, Jonathan Herring, James Neuberger, Isabel Quiroga, Cornelius Engelmann, Ernest Ryder, Thomas Berg
{"title":"Strong or Weak Consent in Medical Law? Identifying the Values Protected in Transplantation Medicine in Europe.","authors":"Farrah Raza, Jonathan Herring, James Neuberger, Isabel Quiroga, Cornelius Engelmann, Ernest Ryder, Thomas Berg","doi":"10.1163/15718093-bja10148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Across European legal systems, there is a consensus on the importance of consent in medical ethics as recently emphasised by the European Court of Human Rights in Pindo Mulla v Spain. Yet, consent in medical law poses several challenges in practice which includes the need to reduce mistakes in the consent process. We argue that consent is scalar and includes 'strong' consent (where a patient has maximum capacity to express a fully informed, voluntary decision) to weak consent (where a patient has said 'yes' but with limited understanding or liberty. We propose a 'model of disaggregating consent' which highlights the range of values that consent protects albeit to varying degrees in different cases. We apply our model to the example of organ donation and organ transplantation to illuminate how our model paves the way for improving decision-making in the consent process by factoring in the pluralistic values at play.</p>","PeriodicalId":43934,"journal":{"name":"EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH LAW","volume":" ","pages":"281-307"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH LAW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718093-bja10148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Across European legal systems, there is a consensus on the importance of consent in medical ethics as recently emphasised by the European Court of Human Rights in Pindo Mulla v Spain. Yet, consent in medical law poses several challenges in practice which includes the need to reduce mistakes in the consent process. We argue that consent is scalar and includes 'strong' consent (where a patient has maximum capacity to express a fully informed, voluntary decision) to weak consent (where a patient has said 'yes' but with limited understanding or liberty. We propose a 'model of disaggregating consent' which highlights the range of values that consent protects albeit to varying degrees in different cases. We apply our model to the example of organ donation and organ transplantation to illuminate how our model paves the way for improving decision-making in the consent process by factoring in the pluralistic values at play.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Jewish Studies (EJJS) is the Journal of the European Association for Jewish Studies (EAJS). Its main purpose is to publish high-quality research articles, essays and shorter contributions on all aspects of Jewish Studies. Submissions are all double blind peer-reviewed. Additionally, EJJS seeks to inform its readers on current developments in Jewish Studies: it carries comprehensive review-essays on specific topics, trends and debated questions, as well as regular book-reviews. A further section carries reports on conferences, symposia, and descriptions of research projects in every area of Jewish Studies.