Strong or Weak Consent in Medical Law? Identifying the Values Protected in Transplantation Medicine in Europe.

IF 0.7 Q2 LAW
Farrah Raza, Jonathan Herring, James Neuberger, Isabel Quiroga, Cornelius Engelmann, Ernest Ryder, Thomas Berg
{"title":"Strong or Weak Consent in Medical Law? Identifying the Values Protected in Transplantation Medicine in Europe.","authors":"Farrah Raza, Jonathan Herring, James Neuberger, Isabel Quiroga, Cornelius Engelmann, Ernest Ryder, Thomas Berg","doi":"10.1163/15718093-bja10148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Across European legal systems, there is a consensus on the importance of consent in medical ethics as recently emphasised by the European Court of Human Rights in Pindo Mulla v Spain. Yet, consent in medical law poses several challenges in practice which includes the need to reduce mistakes in the consent process. We argue that consent is scalar and includes 'strong' consent (where a patient has maximum capacity to express a fully informed, voluntary decision) to weak consent (where a patient has said 'yes' but with limited understanding or liberty. We propose a 'model of disaggregating consent' which highlights the range of values that consent protects albeit to varying degrees in different cases. We apply our model to the example of organ donation and organ transplantation to illuminate how our model paves the way for improving decision-making in the consent process by factoring in the pluralistic values at play.</p>","PeriodicalId":43934,"journal":{"name":"EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH LAW","volume":" ","pages":"281-307"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH LAW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718093-bja10148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Across European legal systems, there is a consensus on the importance of consent in medical ethics as recently emphasised by the European Court of Human Rights in Pindo Mulla v Spain. Yet, consent in medical law poses several challenges in practice which includes the need to reduce mistakes in the consent process. We argue that consent is scalar and includes 'strong' consent (where a patient has maximum capacity to express a fully informed, voluntary decision) to weak consent (where a patient has said 'yes' but with limited understanding or liberty. We propose a 'model of disaggregating consent' which highlights the range of values that consent protects albeit to varying degrees in different cases. We apply our model to the example of organ donation and organ transplantation to illuminate how our model paves the way for improving decision-making in the consent process by factoring in the pluralistic values at play.

医疗法中的同意是强是弱?确定欧洲移植医学保护的价值。
正如欧洲人权法院最近在Pindo Mulla诉西班牙案中所强调的那样,在整个欧洲法律体系中,同意在医学伦理中的重要性已达成共识。然而,医疗法中的同意在实践中提出了若干挑战,其中包括需要减少同意过程中的错误。我们认为同意是标量的,包括“强烈”同意(患者有最大能力表达充分知情,自愿决定)到弱同意(患者说“是”,但理解或自由有限)。我们提出了一个“分解同意模型”,该模型强调了同意在不同情况下保护的价值范围,尽管程度不同。我们将我们的模型应用于器官捐赠和器官移植的例子,以阐明我们的模型如何通过考虑起作用的多元价值观,为改善同意过程中的决策铺平道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Jewish Studies (EJJS) is the Journal of the European Association for Jewish Studies (EAJS). Its main purpose is to publish high-quality research articles, essays and shorter contributions on all aspects of Jewish Studies. Submissions are all double blind peer-reviewed. Additionally, EJJS seeks to inform its readers on current developments in Jewish Studies: it carries comprehensive review-essays on specific topics, trends and debated questions, as well as regular book-reviews. A further section carries reports on conferences, symposia, and descriptions of research projects in every area of Jewish Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信