Optimal bone-implant contact sites in the zygomatic region for quad zygomatic implants placement: a retrospective study in Vietnamese patients on CBCT.

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Mi Nguyen-Tra Le, Tri Minh Tran, Phuc Ngoc Nguyen, Hung Chi Vo, Lam Hung Tran
{"title":"Optimal bone-implant contact sites in the zygomatic region for quad zygomatic implants placement: a retrospective study in Vietnamese patients on CBCT.","authors":"Mi Nguyen-Tra Le, Tri Minh Tran, Phuc Ngoc Nguyen, Hung Chi Vo, Lam Hung Tran","doi":"10.1038/s41405-025-00350-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Zygomatic implants represent a reliable treatment modality for patients with severe maxillary bone resorption, eliminating the need for bone grafting and enabling immediate loading. This study utilized cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to identify optimal zygomatic bone regions for implant placement by assessing bone-implant contact (BIC) while minimizing intrusion risks into the infratemporal fossa (ITF). Additionally, differences in zygomatic characteristics between males and females were investigated to address the limited evidence regarding the influence of biological sex on BIC and implant stability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed CBCT scans from 20 fully edentulous patients (9 male and 11 female) with severe maxillary resorption. Zygomatic bone thickness, length, and BIC were measured at 12 anatomical points across the superior, middle, and inferior regions using standardized CBCT imaging and Nobel Clinician software. Virtual implants were placed to evaluate intrusion into the infratemporal fossa. Statistical analyses, including Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests, were conducted to compare zygomatic measurements across regions and between genders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The greatest bone thicknesses in the superior, middle, and inferior regions were observed at Point A<sub>1</sub> (8.53 ± 1.63 mm), Point B<sub>1</sub> (6.97 ± 1.01 mm), and Point C<sub>0</sub> (6.36 ± 1.02 mm), respectively. Point A<sub>3</sub> (17.65 ± 2.24 mm) in the anterior region and Point B<sub>1</sub> (13.34 ± 2.35 mm) in the posterior region were identified as optimal implant sites, providing the highest BICs while minimizing intrusion risks. Zygomatic thickness and BIC at these optimal sites were significantly greater in males than females (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Point A<sub>3</sub> and Point B<sub>1</sub> are the most suitable sites for zygomatic implant placement. Quad zygomatic implants may achieve enhanced primary stability in males than in females due to greater zygomatic bone thickness and BIC.</p>","PeriodicalId":36997,"journal":{"name":"BDJ Open","volume":"11 1","pages":"61"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12181228/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BDJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-025-00350-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Zygomatic implants represent a reliable treatment modality for patients with severe maxillary bone resorption, eliminating the need for bone grafting and enabling immediate loading. This study utilized cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to identify optimal zygomatic bone regions for implant placement by assessing bone-implant contact (BIC) while minimizing intrusion risks into the infratemporal fossa (ITF). Additionally, differences in zygomatic characteristics between males and females were investigated to address the limited evidence regarding the influence of biological sex on BIC and implant stability.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed CBCT scans from 20 fully edentulous patients (9 male and 11 female) with severe maxillary resorption. Zygomatic bone thickness, length, and BIC were measured at 12 anatomical points across the superior, middle, and inferior regions using standardized CBCT imaging and Nobel Clinician software. Virtual implants were placed to evaluate intrusion into the infratemporal fossa. Statistical analyses, including Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests, were conducted to compare zygomatic measurements across regions and between genders.

Results: The greatest bone thicknesses in the superior, middle, and inferior regions were observed at Point A1 (8.53 ± 1.63 mm), Point B1 (6.97 ± 1.01 mm), and Point C0 (6.36 ± 1.02 mm), respectively. Point A3 (17.65 ± 2.24 mm) in the anterior region and Point B1 (13.34 ± 2.35 mm) in the posterior region were identified as optimal implant sites, providing the highest BICs while minimizing intrusion risks. Zygomatic thickness and BIC at these optimal sites were significantly greater in males than females (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: Point A3 and Point B1 are the most suitable sites for zygomatic implant placement. Quad zygomatic implants may achieve enhanced primary stability in males than in females due to greater zygomatic bone thickness and BIC.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

颧骨区域的最佳骨-种植体接触点在四侧颧骨种植体放置:越南患者的CBCT回顾性研究。
颧骨种植体对于上颌骨吸收严重的患者来说是一种可靠的治疗方式,消除了植骨的需要,并且能够立即加载。本研究利用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)通过评估骨-种植体接触(BIC)来确定植入颧骨的最佳区域,同时最大限度地降低侵入颞下窝(ITF)的风险。此外,研究了男性和女性颧骨特征的差异,以解决生物性别对BIC和植入物稳定性影响的有限证据。方法:回顾性分析20例重度上颌吸收全无牙患者(男9例,女11例)的CBCT扫描结果。使用标准化的CBCT成像和Nobel Clinician软件在横跨上、中、下区域的12个解剖点测量颧骨厚度、长度和BIC。放置虚拟植入物以评估颞下窝的侵入情况。统计分析,包括Kruskal-Wallis和Mann-Whitney U测试,用于比较不同地区和性别之间的颧骨测量。结果:A1点(8.53±1.63 mm)、B1点(6.97±1.01 mm)、C0点(6.36±1.02 mm)骨厚度最大。前牙区A3点(17.65±2.24 mm)和后牙区B1点(13.34±2.35 mm)为最佳种植位置,可提供最高的bic,同时将侵入风险降至最低。结论:A3点和B1点是颧骨种植体最适合的位置。由于颧骨厚度和BIC更大,男性颧骨植入物可以比女性获得更好的初级稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BDJ Open
BDJ Open Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书