Integrated decision support system for optimizing time and cost trade offs in linear repetitive construction projects.

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Ahmed Gouda Mohamed, Ali Hassan Ali, Ahmed Adel Abdelhady
{"title":"Integrated decision support system for optimizing time and cost trade offs in linear repetitive construction projects.","authors":"Ahmed Gouda Mohamed, Ali Hassan Ali, Ahmed Adel Abdelhady","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-02837-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Linear repetitive construction projects present unique challenges in optimizing both completion time and cost performance. Traditional scheduling techniques often struggle to effectively address these complexities. This paper aims to enhance project optimization by introducing a metaheuristic-based Time-Cost Trade-off (TCT) framework specifically designed for repetitive project environments. Unlike previous studies that focus solely on single-algorithm applications, this research evaluates two metaheuristic optimization strategies-Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO)-within a consistent problem setting. The framework employs both algorithms, which are independently assessed for their effectiveness in tackling the Linear Repetitive Project Time-Cost Trade-off (LRPTCT) problem. The methodology utilizes task decomposition alongside the Line of Balance (LOB) scheduling technique, facilitating a more detailed and adaptable planning process. Each sub-task is systematically evaluated to identify the optimal construction method based on cost-time trade-offs, with scheduling constraints integrated into the fitness functions of both GA and PSO. Results from an in-depth case study reveal significant improvements in project efficiency. Specifically, GA achieved approximately a 3.25% reduction in direct costs, a 20% reduction in indirect costs, and a 7% reduction in total construction costs. In comparison, PSO demonstrated slightly superior cost performance, with a 4% reduction in direct costs and comparable reductions in indirect costs, along with a 20% decrease in total project duration. These findings highlight practical gains in resource utilization and scheduling efficiency. This study presents a structured, comparative analysis of GA and PSO within the LOB-based TCT framework, providing a replicable methodology for optimizing schedules in linear repetitive projects. By bridging the gap between traditional scheduling techniques and advanced optimization algorithms, this research contributes valuable insights for enhancing operational efficiency and informed decision-making in construction project management.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"20099"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12181440/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-02837-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Linear repetitive construction projects present unique challenges in optimizing both completion time and cost performance. Traditional scheduling techniques often struggle to effectively address these complexities. This paper aims to enhance project optimization by introducing a metaheuristic-based Time-Cost Trade-off (TCT) framework specifically designed for repetitive project environments. Unlike previous studies that focus solely on single-algorithm applications, this research evaluates two metaheuristic optimization strategies-Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO)-within a consistent problem setting. The framework employs both algorithms, which are independently assessed for their effectiveness in tackling the Linear Repetitive Project Time-Cost Trade-off (LRPTCT) problem. The methodology utilizes task decomposition alongside the Line of Balance (LOB) scheduling technique, facilitating a more detailed and adaptable planning process. Each sub-task is systematically evaluated to identify the optimal construction method based on cost-time trade-offs, with scheduling constraints integrated into the fitness functions of both GA and PSO. Results from an in-depth case study reveal significant improvements in project efficiency. Specifically, GA achieved approximately a 3.25% reduction in direct costs, a 20% reduction in indirect costs, and a 7% reduction in total construction costs. In comparison, PSO demonstrated slightly superior cost performance, with a 4% reduction in direct costs and comparable reductions in indirect costs, along with a 20% decrease in total project duration. These findings highlight practical gains in resource utilization and scheduling efficiency. This study presents a structured, comparative analysis of GA and PSO within the LOB-based TCT framework, providing a replicable methodology for optimizing schedules in linear repetitive projects. By bridging the gap between traditional scheduling techniques and advanced optimization algorithms, this research contributes valuable insights for enhancing operational efficiency and informed decision-making in construction project management.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

线性重复建设项目中优化时间和成本权衡的集成决策支持系统。
线性重复建设项目在优化完工时间和成本效益方面面临着独特的挑战。传统的调度技术常常难以有效地处理这些复杂性。本文旨在通过引入专门为重复项目环境设计的基于元启发式的时间成本权衡(TCT)框架来增强项目优化。与以往的研究只关注单一算法应用不同,本研究在一致的问题设置中评估了两种元启发式优化策略——遗传算法(GA)和粒子群优化(PSO)。该框架采用了这两种算法,它们在解决线性重复项目时间-成本权衡(LRPTCT)问题方面的有效性被独立评估。该方法利用任务分解和平衡线(LOB)调度技术,促进更详细和适应性更强的规划过程。将调度约束整合到遗传算法和粒子群算法的适应度函数中,对每个子任务进行系统评估,以确定基于成本-时间权衡的最优构造方法。一个深入的案例研究的结果揭示了项目效率的显著提高。具体来说,GA实现了大约3.25%的直接成本降低,20%的间接成本降低,7%的总建筑成本降低。相比之下,PSO的成本表现略好,直接成本降低了4%,间接成本也相应降低,项目总工期缩短了20%。这些发现突出了在资源利用和调度效率方面的实际收益。本研究在基于lob的TCT框架内对遗传算法和PSO进行了结构化的比较分析,为线性重复项目的优化进度提供了一种可复制的方法。通过弥合传统调度技术与先进优化算法之间的差距,本研究为提高施工项目管理的运营效率和知情决策提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信