Afton M Bierlich, Nanja T Scheel, Jana C Koehler, Carola Bloch, Irene Sophia Plank, Christine M Falter-Wagner
{"title":"Attenuated behavioral interpersonal synchrony in autistic adults is not explained by perception of timing.","authors":"Afton M Bierlich, Nanja T Scheel, Jana C Koehler, Carola Bloch, Irene Sophia Plank, Christine M Falter-Wagner","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-05395-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Attenuated interpersonal synchrony (IPS) has been shown between autistic individuals and their interaction partners; however, the mechanisms of this attenuation remain unclear. One possibility could lie in perceiving the timing of others' behaviors. The present study aimed to relate the behavioral production of IPS with the perception of temporal dynamics of social interactions and event timing perception in autistic and non-autistic adults. Autistic and non-autistic participants engaged in naturalistic conversations with a non-autistic stranger, who was naïve to the participant's diagnostic status. Behavioral IPS was computed using automatic video-based analysis. Participants reported their experiences of perceived IPS with the partner, as a measure of the perceived temporal dynamics of the social interaction. A perceptual simultaneity task measured the perception of event timing in a nonsocial context. Bayesian linear mixed models were used to evaluate the effects of perceived IPS ratings and simultaneity thresholds on behavioral IPS. Expectedly, behavioral IPS was reduced for dyads including an autistic adult. Neither perceived IPS ratings, nor simultaneity thresholds, were associated with reduced behavioral IPS for dyads with or without an autistic adult. These findings hint that attenuated behavioral IPS may not result from atypical perceived timing of others' behaviors or event timing perception.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"20157"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12181382/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-05395-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Attenuated interpersonal synchrony (IPS) has been shown between autistic individuals and their interaction partners; however, the mechanisms of this attenuation remain unclear. One possibility could lie in perceiving the timing of others' behaviors. The present study aimed to relate the behavioral production of IPS with the perception of temporal dynamics of social interactions and event timing perception in autistic and non-autistic adults. Autistic and non-autistic participants engaged in naturalistic conversations with a non-autistic stranger, who was naïve to the participant's diagnostic status. Behavioral IPS was computed using automatic video-based analysis. Participants reported their experiences of perceived IPS with the partner, as a measure of the perceived temporal dynamics of the social interaction. A perceptual simultaneity task measured the perception of event timing in a nonsocial context. Bayesian linear mixed models were used to evaluate the effects of perceived IPS ratings and simultaneity thresholds on behavioral IPS. Expectedly, behavioral IPS was reduced for dyads including an autistic adult. Neither perceived IPS ratings, nor simultaneity thresholds, were associated with reduced behavioral IPS for dyads with or without an autistic adult. These findings hint that attenuated behavioral IPS may not result from atypical perceived timing of others' behaviors or event timing perception.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.