Outcomes after total en bloc spondylectomy at a mean follow-up of 11 years.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine Pub Date : 2025-06-20 Print Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.3171/2025.3.SPINE241451
Wai Kiu Thomas Liu, Yat Wa Wong, Kenny Yat Hong Kwan
{"title":"Outcomes after total en bloc spondylectomy at a mean follow-up of 11 years.","authors":"Wai Kiu Thomas Liu, Yat Wa Wong, Kenny Yat Hong Kwan","doi":"10.3171/2025.3.SPINE241451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) of spinal tumors results in a large vertebral defect. Despite reconstruction and fusion, there is the potential concern for long-term mechanical stability. This retrospective cohort study investigated the long-term outcome of TES and reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-three patients (mean age 40.0 ± 15.3 years) underwent TES for either primary spinal tumors or solitary metastasis and reconstruction with instrumented posterior spinal fusion and anterior fusion with titanium mesh cages at the authors' institution from November 2001 to April 2022. The mean follow-up was 11.5 ± 4.9 years. Primary diagnoses included giant cell tumors (n = 13), primary sarcomas (n = 3), hemangiopericytomas (n = 2), solitary metastases (n = 2), aneurysmal bone cyst (n = 1), hemangioma (n = 1), and chordoma (n = 1). Tumors were located in the lumbar (n = 10) or thoracic (n = 13) spine. Fifteen patients had 1 vertebral level resected, 2 patients had 2, 4 patients had 3, 1 patient had 4, and 1 patient had 5 levels resected. The mean operative duration was 751.7 ± 212.6 minutes, and the mean intraoperative blood loss was 2864.3 ± 2124.8 ml. The mean length of resected tumor was 51.6 ± 23.3 mm. Investigated outcomes were instrumentation failure, revision, and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve patients required revision surgery, 8 of whom had instrumentation failure with rod fracture. The mean time to instrumentation failure was 7.6 ± 3.9 years. Instrumentation failure with rod fracture was associated with longer operation time (p = 0.031), more blood loss (p = 0.002), and a longer length of resected tumor (p = 0.035). No significant association was identified between instrumentation failure and radiological bony union, which was demonstrated in 73.9% of patients. The overall revision-free survivals were 67.0% and 48.8% at 5 and 10 years postoperatively, respectively. The 5- and 10-year instrumentation failure-free survivals were 85.2% and 65.7%, respectively. Local recurrence of the pathology occurred in 3 patients (13.0%), with a mean time to local recurrence of 3.4 ± 4.4 years. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that 91.3% and 84.3% of the patients would be free from local recurrence at 5 and 10 years postoperatively, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although local recurrence was uncommon after TES, revision surgery, particularly for instrumentation failure, emerged as a common late complication following TES. Long resection length and long complicated operations increase the likelihood of future instrumentation failure. Radiological bony union does not guarantee long-term success of the construct.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"265-272"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.3.SPINE241451","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) of spinal tumors results in a large vertebral defect. Despite reconstruction and fusion, there is the potential concern for long-term mechanical stability. This retrospective cohort study investigated the long-term outcome of TES and reconstruction.

Methods: Twenty-three patients (mean age 40.0 ± 15.3 years) underwent TES for either primary spinal tumors or solitary metastasis and reconstruction with instrumented posterior spinal fusion and anterior fusion with titanium mesh cages at the authors' institution from November 2001 to April 2022. The mean follow-up was 11.5 ± 4.9 years. Primary diagnoses included giant cell tumors (n = 13), primary sarcomas (n = 3), hemangiopericytomas (n = 2), solitary metastases (n = 2), aneurysmal bone cyst (n = 1), hemangioma (n = 1), and chordoma (n = 1). Tumors were located in the lumbar (n = 10) or thoracic (n = 13) spine. Fifteen patients had 1 vertebral level resected, 2 patients had 2, 4 patients had 3, 1 patient had 4, and 1 patient had 5 levels resected. The mean operative duration was 751.7 ± 212.6 minutes, and the mean intraoperative blood loss was 2864.3 ± 2124.8 ml. The mean length of resected tumor was 51.6 ± 23.3 mm. Investigated outcomes were instrumentation failure, revision, and postoperative complications.

Results: Twelve patients required revision surgery, 8 of whom had instrumentation failure with rod fracture. The mean time to instrumentation failure was 7.6 ± 3.9 years. Instrumentation failure with rod fracture was associated with longer operation time (p = 0.031), more blood loss (p = 0.002), and a longer length of resected tumor (p = 0.035). No significant association was identified between instrumentation failure and radiological bony union, which was demonstrated in 73.9% of patients. The overall revision-free survivals were 67.0% and 48.8% at 5 and 10 years postoperatively, respectively. The 5- and 10-year instrumentation failure-free survivals were 85.2% and 65.7%, respectively. Local recurrence of the pathology occurred in 3 patients (13.0%), with a mean time to local recurrence of 3.4 ± 4.4 years. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that 91.3% and 84.3% of the patients would be free from local recurrence at 5 and 10 years postoperatively, respectively.

Conclusions: Although local recurrence was uncommon after TES, revision surgery, particularly for instrumentation failure, emerged as a common late complication following TES. Long resection length and long complicated operations increase the likelihood of future instrumentation failure. Radiological bony union does not guarantee long-term success of the construct.

全椎体切除后平均随访11年的结果。
目的:脊柱肿瘤全椎体切除术(TES)造成较大的椎体缺损。尽管有重建和融合,但仍存在长期机械稳定性的潜在问题。这项回顾性队列研究调查了TES和重建的长期结果。方法:2001年11月至2022年4月,23例患者(平均年龄40.0±15.3岁)因原发性脊柱肿瘤或单发转移接受TES治疗,并采用固定式脊柱后路融合术和钛网笼前路融合术重建。平均随访时间为11.5±4.9年。原发诊断包括巨细胞瘤(n = 13)、原发性肉瘤(n = 3)、血管外皮细胞瘤(n = 2)、孤立转移瘤(n = 2)、动脉瘤性骨囊肿(n = 1)、血管瘤(n = 1)和脊索瘤(n = 1)。肿瘤位于腰椎(n = 10)或胸椎(n = 13)。1节切除15例,2节切除2例,3节切除4例,4节切除1例,5节切除1例。平均手术时间751.7±212.6分钟,平均术中出血量2864.3±2124.8 ml,切除肿瘤平均长度51.6±23.3 mm。调查结果包括内固定失败、翻修和术后并发症。结果:12例患者需要翻修手术,其中8例发生内固定失败伴棒骨折。发生仪器故障的平均时间为7.6±3.9年。内固定失败合并棒骨折与手术时间较长(p = 0.031)、出血量较多(p = 0.002)、切除肿瘤长度较长(p = 0.035)相关。73.9%的患者证实了内固定失败与放射性骨愈合之间没有明显的关联。术后5年和10年的总体无修复生存率分别为67.0%和48.8%。5年和10年仪器无故障生存率分别为85.2%和65.7%。病理局部复发3例(13.0%),平均至局部复发时间3.4±4.4年。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,91.3%和84.3%的患者在术后5年和10年没有局部复发。结论:尽管TES术后局部复发不常见,但翻修手术,特别是器械失败,成为TES术后常见的晚期并发症。较长的切除长度和长期复杂的手术增加了未来仪器故障的可能性。放射学骨愈合不能保证该构造的长期成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Primarily publish original works in neurosurgery but also include studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信