Social Media Use and Jaw Motor Activity: Insights From Electromyography and Self-Report Data.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
S Lee, D Koshkebaghi, P Mouseli, I Cioffi
{"title":"Social Media Use and Jaw Motor Activity: Insights From Electromyography and Self-Report Data.","authors":"S Lee, D Koshkebaghi, P Mouseli, I Cioffi","doi":"10.1111/joor.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral behaviors (OBs) are recognized risk factors for temporomandibular disorders. Social media use has been reported to be linked with stress, a key regulator of jaw motor activity. Whether social media use increases the incidence of OBs remains undetermined.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the impact of social media use on jaw motor activity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-two individuals (36 females, 36 males; 22.4 ± 2.8 years) completed an online survey assessing their screen habits and OBs using the oral behaviour checklist (OBC). A subset of 30 healthy participants (15 females, 15 males; 22.2 ± 2.0 years) completed an in-person experimental session involving three 30-min tasks (silent reading, using social media and watching a documentary on TV). The electromyographic (EMG) activity of the right masseter was measured throughout the session. OBs were identified as events with EMG amplitude exceeding 10% of the participants' maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) lasting at least 2 s. General linear and mixed-effect models were used to test relationships between screen habits, OBC scores, and task-related EMG metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean ± SD daily social media use was 154 ± 73 min on weekdays and increased to 185 ± 85 min on weekends (p < 0.001). Time spent on social media was a significant but weak predictor of OBC scores (B = 0.042, SE = 0.014, t = 3.009; 95% CI = 0.014-0.070; p = 0.004). No significant differences in OB frequency, duration, or amplitude were observed across experimental tasks (all p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While social media use was modestly associated with self-reported OBs, it did not significantly affect jaw motor activity in a controlled experimental setting. Further studies using ambulatory EMG recordings are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":16605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.70001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Oral behaviors (OBs) are recognized risk factors for temporomandibular disorders. Social media use has been reported to be linked with stress, a key regulator of jaw motor activity. Whether social media use increases the incidence of OBs remains undetermined.

Objective: To investigate the impact of social media use on jaw motor activity.

Methods: Seventy-two individuals (36 females, 36 males; 22.4 ± 2.8 years) completed an online survey assessing their screen habits and OBs using the oral behaviour checklist (OBC). A subset of 30 healthy participants (15 females, 15 males; 22.2 ± 2.0 years) completed an in-person experimental session involving three 30-min tasks (silent reading, using social media and watching a documentary on TV). The electromyographic (EMG) activity of the right masseter was measured throughout the session. OBs were identified as events with EMG amplitude exceeding 10% of the participants' maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) lasting at least 2 s. General linear and mixed-effect models were used to test relationships between screen habits, OBC scores, and task-related EMG metrics.

Results: Mean ± SD daily social media use was 154 ± 73 min on weekdays and increased to 185 ± 85 min on weekends (p < 0.001). Time spent on social media was a significant but weak predictor of OBC scores (B = 0.042, SE = 0.014, t = 3.009; 95% CI = 0.014-0.070; p = 0.004). No significant differences in OB frequency, duration, or amplitude were observed across experimental tasks (all p > 0.05).

Conclusion: While social media use was modestly associated with self-reported OBs, it did not significantly affect jaw motor activity in a controlled experimental setting. Further studies using ambulatory EMG recordings are recommended.

社交媒体使用和下颌运动活动:来自肌电图和自我报告数据的见解。
背景:口腔行为(OBs)是公认的颞下颌疾病的危险因素。据报道,社交媒体的使用与压力有关,压力是下巴运动活动的关键调节因素。社交媒体的使用是否会增加OBs的发病率仍未确定。目的:探讨社交媒体使用对下颌运动活动的影响。方法:72只个体(雌性36只,雄性36只;(22.4±2.8岁)使用口腔行为检查表(OBC)完成一项在线调查,评估他们的屏幕习惯和OBC。一个由30名健康参与者组成的子集(15名女性,15名男性;22.2±2.0岁)完成了三个30分钟的实验任务(默读、使用社交媒体和观看电视纪录片)。在整个疗程中测量右咬肌的肌电图(EMG)活动。肌电信号振幅超过参与者最大自愿收缩(MVC)的10%,持续时间至少为2秒。一般线性和混合效应模型用于测试屏幕习惯、OBC分数和任务相关肌电指标之间的关系。结果:平均±SD工作日每日社交媒体使用时间为154±73分钟,周末增加至185±85分钟(p < 0.05)。结论:虽然社交媒体的使用与自我报告的OBs有一定的关联,但在一个受控的实验环境中,它对下颌运动活动没有显著影响。建议使用动态肌电图记录进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of oral rehabilitation
Journal of oral rehabilitation 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Oral Rehabilitation aims to be the most prestigious journal of dental research within all aspects of oral rehabilitation and applied oral physiology. It covers all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to re-establish a subjective and objective harmonious oral function. Oral rehabilitation may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, orofacial traumas, or a variety of dental and oral diseases (primarily dental caries and periodontal diseases) and orofacial pain conditions. As such, oral rehabilitation in the twenty-first century is a matter of skilful diagnosis and minimal, appropriate intervention, the nature of which is intimately linked to a profound knowledge of oral physiology, oral biology, and dental and oral pathology. The scientific content of the journal therefore strives to reflect the best of evidence-based clinical dentistry. Modern clinical management should be based on solid scientific evidence gathered about diagnostic procedures and the properties and efficacy of the chosen intervention (e.g. material science, biological, toxicological, pharmacological or psychological aspects). The content of the journal also reflects documentation of the possible side-effects of rehabilitation, and includes prognostic perspectives of the treatment modalities chosen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信