{"title":"Social Media Use and Jaw Motor Activity: Insights From Electromyography and Self-Report Data.","authors":"S Lee, D Koshkebaghi, P Mouseli, I Cioffi","doi":"10.1111/joor.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral behaviors (OBs) are recognized risk factors for temporomandibular disorders. Social media use has been reported to be linked with stress, a key regulator of jaw motor activity. Whether social media use increases the incidence of OBs remains undetermined.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the impact of social media use on jaw motor activity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-two individuals (36 females, 36 males; 22.4 ± 2.8 years) completed an online survey assessing their screen habits and OBs using the oral behaviour checklist (OBC). A subset of 30 healthy participants (15 females, 15 males; 22.2 ± 2.0 years) completed an in-person experimental session involving three 30-min tasks (silent reading, using social media and watching a documentary on TV). The electromyographic (EMG) activity of the right masseter was measured throughout the session. OBs were identified as events with EMG amplitude exceeding 10% of the participants' maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) lasting at least 2 s. General linear and mixed-effect models were used to test relationships between screen habits, OBC scores, and task-related EMG metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean ± SD daily social media use was 154 ± 73 min on weekdays and increased to 185 ± 85 min on weekends (p < 0.001). Time spent on social media was a significant but weak predictor of OBC scores (B = 0.042, SE = 0.014, t = 3.009; 95% CI = 0.014-0.070; p = 0.004). No significant differences in OB frequency, duration, or amplitude were observed across experimental tasks (all p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While social media use was modestly associated with self-reported OBs, it did not significantly affect jaw motor activity in a controlled experimental setting. Further studies using ambulatory EMG recordings are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":16605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.70001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Oral behaviors (OBs) are recognized risk factors for temporomandibular disorders. Social media use has been reported to be linked with stress, a key regulator of jaw motor activity. Whether social media use increases the incidence of OBs remains undetermined.
Objective: To investigate the impact of social media use on jaw motor activity.
Methods: Seventy-two individuals (36 females, 36 males; 22.4 ± 2.8 years) completed an online survey assessing their screen habits and OBs using the oral behaviour checklist (OBC). A subset of 30 healthy participants (15 females, 15 males; 22.2 ± 2.0 years) completed an in-person experimental session involving three 30-min tasks (silent reading, using social media and watching a documentary on TV). The electromyographic (EMG) activity of the right masseter was measured throughout the session. OBs were identified as events with EMG amplitude exceeding 10% of the participants' maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) lasting at least 2 s. General linear and mixed-effect models were used to test relationships between screen habits, OBC scores, and task-related EMG metrics.
Results: Mean ± SD daily social media use was 154 ± 73 min on weekdays and increased to 185 ± 85 min on weekends (p < 0.001). Time spent on social media was a significant but weak predictor of OBC scores (B = 0.042, SE = 0.014, t = 3.009; 95% CI = 0.014-0.070; p = 0.004). No significant differences in OB frequency, duration, or amplitude were observed across experimental tasks (all p > 0.05).
Conclusion: While social media use was modestly associated with self-reported OBs, it did not significantly affect jaw motor activity in a controlled experimental setting. Further studies using ambulatory EMG recordings are recommended.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation aims to be the most prestigious journal of dental research within all aspects of oral rehabilitation and applied oral physiology. It covers all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to re-establish a subjective and objective harmonious oral function.
Oral rehabilitation may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, orofacial traumas, or a variety of dental and oral diseases (primarily dental caries and periodontal diseases) and orofacial pain conditions. As such, oral rehabilitation in the twenty-first century is a matter of skilful diagnosis and minimal, appropriate intervention, the nature of which is intimately linked to a profound knowledge of oral physiology, oral biology, and dental and oral pathology.
The scientific content of the journal therefore strives to reflect the best of evidence-based clinical dentistry. Modern clinical management should be based on solid scientific evidence gathered about diagnostic procedures and the properties and efficacy of the chosen intervention (e.g. material science, biological, toxicological, pharmacological or psychological aspects). The content of the journal also reflects documentation of the possible side-effects of rehabilitation, and includes prognostic perspectives of the treatment modalities chosen.