Association between folate intake and suicidal ideation: NHANES 2005-2018 and Mendelian randomization.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ling Feng, Shandie Li, Chaorui Li
{"title":"Association between folate intake and suicidal ideation: NHANES 2005-2018 and Mendelian randomization.","authors":"Ling Feng, Shandie Li, Chaorui Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2025.119730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous findings indicated that there was an association between folate intake and suicidal behaviors. Nevertheless, whether folate intake influences suicidal ideation remains inconclusive. Consequently, this research focuses on investigating the link between folate intake and suicidal ideation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data utilized came from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database, with a coverage period of 2005-2018. We examined the correlation between folate intake and suicidal ideation by applying weighted logistic regression, restricted cubic spline (RCS) models, and subgroup analysis. Mendelian randomization (MR) was utilized as an instrumental variable method to evaluate the potential causality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NHANES analysis revealed a non-linear inverse relationship between folate intake and suicidal ideation (P for nonlinear: 0.014). After adjusting for all covariates, participants in the fourth quartile of folate intake demonstrated a 38 % diminished risk of suicidal ideation relative to those in the first quartile, for each incremental unit of folate intake (OR: 0.62, 95%CI: 0.44-0.89). Subgroup analysis revealed that the relationship between folate intake and suicidal ideation remained consistent across gender, race, smoking status, diabetes, hypertension and depression (P for interaction>0.05). Nevertheless, the Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was unable to show causality between folate intake and suicidal ideation (OR: 0.944, 95%CI: 0.788-1.131, P: 0.533).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An inverse connection was observed between folate intake and suicidal ideation, but no causal relationship was established.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"119730"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2025.119730","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous findings indicated that there was an association between folate intake and suicidal behaviors. Nevertheless, whether folate intake influences suicidal ideation remains inconclusive. Consequently, this research focuses on investigating the link between folate intake and suicidal ideation.

Methods: The data utilized came from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database, with a coverage period of 2005-2018. We examined the correlation between folate intake and suicidal ideation by applying weighted logistic regression, restricted cubic spline (RCS) models, and subgroup analysis. Mendelian randomization (MR) was utilized as an instrumental variable method to evaluate the potential causality.

Results: The NHANES analysis revealed a non-linear inverse relationship between folate intake and suicidal ideation (P for nonlinear: 0.014). After adjusting for all covariates, participants in the fourth quartile of folate intake demonstrated a 38 % diminished risk of suicidal ideation relative to those in the first quartile, for each incremental unit of folate intake (OR: 0.62, 95%CI: 0.44-0.89). Subgroup analysis revealed that the relationship between folate intake and suicidal ideation remained consistent across gender, race, smoking status, diabetes, hypertension and depression (P for interaction>0.05). Nevertheless, the Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was unable to show causality between folate intake and suicidal ideation (OR: 0.944, 95%CI: 0.788-1.131, P: 0.533).

Conclusions: An inverse connection was observed between folate intake and suicidal ideation, but no causal relationship was established.

叶酸摄入量与自杀意念之间的关系:NHANES 2005-2018和孟德尔随机化。
背景:先前的研究结果表明叶酸摄入量与自杀行为之间存在关联。然而,叶酸摄入是否影响自杀意念仍然没有定论。因此,本研究的重点是调查叶酸摄入量和自杀意念之间的联系。方法:使用的数据来自国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)数据库,覆盖期为2005-2018年。我们通过应用加权逻辑回归、受限三次样条(RCS)模型和亚组分析来检验叶酸摄入量与自杀意念之间的相关性。使用孟德尔随机化(MR)作为工具变量方法来评估潜在的因果关系。结果:NHANES分析显示叶酸摄入量与自杀意念呈非线性负相关(非线性P值:0.014)。在对所有协变量进行调整后,叶酸摄入量每增加一个单位,第四个四分位数的参与者的自杀意念风险相对于第一个四分位数的参与者降低了38% % (OR: 0.62, 95%CI: 0.44-0.89)。亚组分析显示,叶酸摄入量与自杀意念的关系在性别、种族、吸烟状况、糖尿病、高血压和抑郁之间保持一致(交互作用P < 0.05)。然而,孟德尔随机化(MR)分析无法显示叶酸摄入量与自杀意念之间的因果关系(OR: 0.944, 95%CI: 0.788-1.131, P: 0.533)。结论:叶酸摄入与自杀意念呈负相关,但未建立因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信