Evaluating blood pressure targets in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Kazuhiro Tada, Akira Fujiwara, Naoki Sugano, Kaori Hayashi, Atsushi Sakima, Yoichi Takami, Kosuke Masutani, Hisatomi Arima, Shuji Arima, Naoki Nakagawa
{"title":"Evaluating blood pressure targets in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Kazuhiro Tada, Akira Fujiwara, Naoki Sugano, Kaori Hayashi, Atsushi Sakima, Yoichi Takami, Kosuke Masutani, Hisatomi Arima, Shuji Arima, Naoki Nakagawa","doi":"10.1038/s41440-025-02262-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many studies have investigated optimal blood pressure (BP) targets in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD); however, no consensus has been reached. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, including the latest randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and Ichushi Web for publications up to 13 June 2024, supplemented by hand searches. We included RCTs comparing the benefits and risks of more intensive (target BP: <130/80 mmHg) versus less intensive BP control (target BP: 130-149/80-89 mmHg or usual care) in patients with CKD aged ≥18 years, regardless of diabetes status. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events. Secondary outcomes included renal events, including 50% reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)/GFR, and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and variance, and obtained summary estimates of the effects with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model with inverse variance weighting. Our meta-analysis included nine RCTs. More intensive BP control tended to reduce all-cause mortality (RR = 0.81; 95% CI 0.65-1.00; p = 0.051) and cardiovascular events (RR = 0.89; 95% CI 0.77-1.03; p = 0.13), but the differences were not significant. More intensive BP control did not increase the risk of serious renal events, including 50% reduction in eGFR/GFR (RR = 0.95; 95% CI 0.74-1.22; p = 0.69) or progression to ESKD (RR = 0.92; 95% CI 0.75-1.14; p = 0.45). These findings suggest that intensive BP control targeting <130/80 mmHg may reduce the risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in patients with CKD, without increasing the risk of serious renal events. This meta-analysis of nine RCTs in patients with CKD found that more intensive BP control tended to reduce all-cause mortality and CVD events compared with less intensive control, without increasing serious kidney events, including 50% eGFR/GFR reduction, or ESKD.</p>","PeriodicalId":13029,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-025-02262-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many studies have investigated optimal blood pressure (BP) targets in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD); however, no consensus has been reached. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, including the latest randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and Ichushi Web for publications up to 13 June 2024, supplemented by hand searches. We included RCTs comparing the benefits and risks of more intensive (target BP: <130/80 mmHg) versus less intensive BP control (target BP: 130-149/80-89 mmHg or usual care) in patients with CKD aged ≥18 years, regardless of diabetes status. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events. Secondary outcomes included renal events, including 50% reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)/GFR, and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and variance, and obtained summary estimates of the effects with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model with inverse variance weighting. Our meta-analysis included nine RCTs. More intensive BP control tended to reduce all-cause mortality (RR = 0.81; 95% CI 0.65-1.00; p = 0.051) and cardiovascular events (RR = 0.89; 95% CI 0.77-1.03; p = 0.13), but the differences were not significant. More intensive BP control did not increase the risk of serious renal events, including 50% reduction in eGFR/GFR (RR = 0.95; 95% CI 0.74-1.22; p = 0.69) or progression to ESKD (RR = 0.92; 95% CI 0.75-1.14; p = 0.45). These findings suggest that intensive BP control targeting <130/80 mmHg may reduce the risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in patients with CKD, without increasing the risk of serious renal events. This meta-analysis of nine RCTs in patients with CKD found that more intensive BP control tended to reduce all-cause mortality and CVD events compared with less intensive control, without increasing serious kidney events, including 50% eGFR/GFR reduction, or ESKD.

评估慢性肾脏疾病的血压目标:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
许多研究探讨了慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)患者的最佳血压(BP)目标;然而,尚未达成共识。因此,我们进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,包括最新的随机对照试验(rct)。我们检索MEDLINE、Cochrane Library和Ichushi Web,检索截止到2024年6月13日的出版物,并辅以人工检索。我们纳入了比较强化治疗(目标血压:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hypertension Research
Hypertension Research 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
249
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hypertension Research is the official publication of the Japanese Society of Hypertension. The journal publishes papers reporting original clinical and experimental research that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of hypertension and related cardiovascular diseases. The journal publishes Review Articles, Articles, Correspondence and Comments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信