María Herrán, Emily C Zabor, Saad Sabbagh, Nadeem Bilani, Ali Hijazi, Mohamed Mohanna, Mira Itani, Zeina Nahleh
{"title":"Disparities in Access to Multigene Testing in Early-Stage, HR-positive, HER2-negative, Lymph Node-negative Breast Cancer.","authors":"María Herrán, Emily C Zabor, Saad Sabbagh, Nadeem Bilani, Ali Hijazi, Mohamed Mohanna, Mira Itani, Zeina Nahleh","doi":"10.1016/j.clbc.2025.05.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multigene testing (MGT) has refined breast cancer treatment. We examined real-world access to MGT for early-stage (I-II), HR-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer and identified factors related to disparities.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis used the National Cancer Database (2007-2017). Socio-demographic and clinical-pathologic factors of interest were included in a multivariable logistic regression to examine associations with MGT use. Multiple imputation was used to find missing data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of N = 107,642 patients were eligible, of which 65,066 (60%) underwent MGT. The odds of undergoing MGT were lower among Black patients compared to White (OR 0.83, 95% CI, 0.79-0.87, P < .001), Hispanic compared to non-Hispanic (OR 0.91, 95% CI, 0.86-0.97, P = .004), uninsured compared to privately insured (OR 0.73,95% CI, 0.64-0.83, P < .001), and those in the West South-Central compared to New England region (OR 0.76, 95% CI, 0.70-0.82, P < .001). Increased odds were observed among those treated at an Integrated Network Cancer Program (OR 1.12, 95% CI, 1.05-1.19, P < .001), higher education level (OR 1.12, 95% CI, 1.06-1.18, P < .001), and a household income between $50,354 to $63,332 (OR 1.08, 95% CI, 1.02-1.14, P = .006). Those with access to MGT had higher odds of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (OR 1.89,95% CI, 1.80-1.99, P < .001) and hormonal therapy (OR 3.17, 95% CI, 3.02-3.32, P < .001) compared to those without access to MGT after adjusting for other factors of interest.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights gaps in access to MGT in breast cancer. Ensuring equitable access to diagnostic and prognostic precision tools could positively impact the odds of receiving appropriate adjuvant therapy and improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10197,"journal":{"name":"Clinical breast cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical breast cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2025.05.018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Multigene testing (MGT) has refined breast cancer treatment. We examined real-world access to MGT for early-stage (I-II), HR-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer and identified factors related to disparities.
Materials and methods: This retrospective analysis used the National Cancer Database (2007-2017). Socio-demographic and clinical-pathologic factors of interest were included in a multivariable logistic regression to examine associations with MGT use. Multiple imputation was used to find missing data.
Results: A total of N = 107,642 patients were eligible, of which 65,066 (60%) underwent MGT. The odds of undergoing MGT were lower among Black patients compared to White (OR 0.83, 95% CI, 0.79-0.87, P < .001), Hispanic compared to non-Hispanic (OR 0.91, 95% CI, 0.86-0.97, P = .004), uninsured compared to privately insured (OR 0.73,95% CI, 0.64-0.83, P < .001), and those in the West South-Central compared to New England region (OR 0.76, 95% CI, 0.70-0.82, P < .001). Increased odds were observed among those treated at an Integrated Network Cancer Program (OR 1.12, 95% CI, 1.05-1.19, P < .001), higher education level (OR 1.12, 95% CI, 1.06-1.18, P < .001), and a household income between $50,354 to $63,332 (OR 1.08, 95% CI, 1.02-1.14, P = .006). Those with access to MGT had higher odds of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (OR 1.89,95% CI, 1.80-1.99, P < .001) and hormonal therapy (OR 3.17, 95% CI, 3.02-3.32, P < .001) compared to those without access to MGT after adjusting for other factors of interest.
Conclusions: This study highlights gaps in access to MGT in breast cancer. Ensuring equitable access to diagnostic and prognostic precision tools could positively impact the odds of receiving appropriate adjuvant therapy and improve patient outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Breast Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of breast cancer. Clinical Breast Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of breast cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to breast cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research reports from various therapeutic modalities, cancer genetics, drug sensitivity and resistance, novel imaging, tumor genomics, biomarkers, and chemoprevention strategies.