Mohammed Zain Raza, Beenish Iqbal, Anand Sundaralingam, Dinesh Addala, Alguili Elsheikh, Rob Hallifax
{"title":"Which clinical factors are predictive of outcome in primary spontaneous pneumothorax management?","authors":"Mohammed Zain Raza, Beenish Iqbal, Anand Sundaralingam, Dinesh Addala, Alguili Elsheikh, Rob Hallifax","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-003089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) occurs when air leaks into the pleural space in patients without known underlying lung disease, causing pain and breathlessness. Optimal management of PSP is not defined and we are unable to predict who will fail medical treatment (ongoing pneumothorax with prolonged air leak). We hypothesised that patients with longer symptom duration and higher symptom scores would be more likely to fail treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospectively collected data from the Randomised Ambulatory Management of Primary Pneumothorax randomised controlled trial of ambulatory management were used to determine which clinical factors are associated with treatment failure including symptom scores, time from symptom onset to presentation, treatment allocation, vital signs, history of prior pneumothorax and size of initial pneumothorax.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 63/236 patients (26.7%) failed treatment. On average, symptoms started 1 day before admission. Multivariable analysis found that patients who presented at least 1 day after symptoms began had a lower risk of treatment failure than those presenting on the day symptoms began (ORs 0.39 (0.18 to 0.81)).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Further work is required to determine psychological drivers of PSP presentation and risks of prolonged air leak.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182152/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2024-003089","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) occurs when air leaks into the pleural space in patients without known underlying lung disease, causing pain and breathlessness. Optimal management of PSP is not defined and we are unable to predict who will fail medical treatment (ongoing pneumothorax with prolonged air leak). We hypothesised that patients with longer symptom duration and higher symptom scores would be more likely to fail treatment.
Methods: Prospectively collected data from the Randomised Ambulatory Management of Primary Pneumothorax randomised controlled trial of ambulatory management were used to determine which clinical factors are associated with treatment failure including symptom scores, time from symptom onset to presentation, treatment allocation, vital signs, history of prior pneumothorax and size of initial pneumothorax.
Results: Overall, 63/236 patients (26.7%) failed treatment. On average, symptoms started 1 day before admission. Multivariable analysis found that patients who presented at least 1 day after symptoms began had a lower risk of treatment failure than those presenting on the day symptoms began (ORs 0.39 (0.18 to 0.81)).
Conclusion: Further work is required to determine psychological drivers of PSP presentation and risks of prolonged air leak.
期刊介绍:
BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.