Effect of catheter dwell time on the risk of central line-associated bloodstream infections in central venous catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Vassiliki Pitiriga, Elsa Campos, John Bakalis, Konstantinos Sagris, George Georgiadis, George Saroglou, Athanasios Tsakris
{"title":"Effect of catheter dwell time on the risk of central line-associated bloodstream infections in central venous catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters.","authors":"Vassiliki Pitiriga, Elsa Campos, John Bakalis, Konstantinos Sagris, George Georgiadis, George Saroglou, Athanasios Tsakris","doi":"10.1186/s13756-025-01590-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding the impact of catheter dwell time on the risk of central-line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) is crucial to developing effective infection prevention strategies. The aim of the study was to evaluate the relationship between catheter dwell time and the risk of CLABSIs caused by multidrug-resistant and common pathogens in patients with central venous catheters (CVCs) and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analysed data from patients admitted consecutively to a tertiary care Greek hospital from 2018-2020. Events were categorized into three groups based on 10-days' intervals: group 1 (≤ 10 days), group 2 (11-20 days), and group 3 (> 21 days).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Α total of 84 patients (mean age 56.4 ± 19.6 years) were included in the study. Among them, 62 (73.8%) had CVC, while 22 (26.2%) had PICC placement. In the CVC cohort, a statistically significant difference in CLABSI rates was observed, with rates of 4.49, 5.57, and 8.54 per 1,000 catheter/days for groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively (p < 0.001). Similarly, higher rates of MDROs were found in group 3, with rates of 2.93, 3.71, and 4.47 per 1,000 catheter/days for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p = 0.01). Regarding the PICC cohort, significant differences in CLABSI rates were observed among the three groups, with rates of 0.93, 2.25, and 1.67 per 1,000 catheter/days for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results emphasize the critical role of catheter selection and duration management in mitigating CLABSI risk, especially for patients with CVCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7950,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","volume":"14 1","pages":"70"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12181930/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-025-01590-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Understanding the impact of catheter dwell time on the risk of central-line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) is crucial to developing effective infection prevention strategies. The aim of the study was to evaluate the relationship between catheter dwell time and the risk of CLABSIs caused by multidrug-resistant and common pathogens in patients with central venous catheters (CVCs) and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs).

Methods: We retrospectively analysed data from patients admitted consecutively to a tertiary care Greek hospital from 2018-2020. Events were categorized into three groups based on 10-days' intervals: group 1 (≤ 10 days), group 2 (11-20 days), and group 3 (> 21 days).

Results: Α total of 84 patients (mean age 56.4 ± 19.6 years) were included in the study. Among them, 62 (73.8%) had CVC, while 22 (26.2%) had PICC placement. In the CVC cohort, a statistically significant difference in CLABSI rates was observed, with rates of 4.49, 5.57, and 8.54 per 1,000 catheter/days for groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively (p < 0.001). Similarly, higher rates of MDROs were found in group 3, with rates of 2.93, 3.71, and 4.47 per 1,000 catheter/days for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p = 0.01). Regarding the PICC cohort, significant differences in CLABSI rates were observed among the three groups, with rates of 0.93, 2.25, and 1.67 per 1,000 catheter/days for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Our results emphasize the critical role of catheter selection and duration management in mitigating CLABSI risk, especially for patients with CVCs.

置管时间对中心静脉置管和外周置管中心静脉相关血流感染风险的影响。
背景:了解导管停留时间对中心静脉相关血流感染(CLABSIs)风险的影响对于制定有效的感染预防策略至关重要。本研究旨在评估中心静脉置管(CVCs)和外周中心置管(PICCs)患者留置导管时间与多药耐药和常见病原体引起CLABSIs风险之间的关系。方法:回顾性分析2018-2020年希腊一家三级医院连续收治的患者数据。按照10天的时间间隔将事件分为3组:1组(≤10天)、2组(11-20天)和3组(bb0 - 21天)。结果:Α共纳入84例患者,平均年龄56.4±19.6岁。其中CVC 62例(73.8%),PICC放置22例(26.2%)。在CVC队列中,观察到CLABSI发生率的统计学差异,1组、2组和3组的CLABSI发生率分别为4.49、5.57和8.54 / 1000导管/天(p结论:我们的研究结果强调了导管选择和持续时间管理在减轻CLABSI风险中的关键作用,特别是对于CVC患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
140
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control is a global forum for all those working on the prevention, diagnostic and treatment of health-care associated infections and antimicrobial resistance development in all health-care settings. The journal covers a broad spectrum of preeminent practices and best available data to the top interventional and translational research, and innovative developments in the field of infection control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信