Mutualism and predation have contrasting effects on the diversity of pine canopy arthropod communities

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecology Pub Date : 2025-06-22 DOI:10.1002/ecy.70120
Sierra N. Hellwitz, Carla Vázquez-González, Lydia S. Dean, Tyler P. Zarubin, Kailen A. Mooney
{"title":"Mutualism and predation have contrasting effects on the diversity of pine canopy arthropod communities","authors":"Sierra N. Hellwitz,&nbsp;Carla Vázquez-González,&nbsp;Lydia S. Dean,&nbsp;Tyler P. Zarubin,&nbsp;Kailen A. Mooney","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Predators are recognized to increase prey diversity by suppressing competitively dominant species, whereas mutualists are predicted to reduce diversity by promoting a competitively dominant partner. However, this trend, and the effect of these interactions when they cooccur, remains underexplored. We investigated the effects of predation and mutualism on the diversity of pine-associated arthropods by excluding insectivorous birds and mutualist ants from branches of <i>Pinus ponderosa</i> and sampling arthropods during a 2-year period. We identified 92,549 arthropods to the species or morphological species level. In the absence of ants, birds had no effects on diversity, whereas in the absence of birds, ants decreased Simpson diversity and Pieolu's evenness but did not affect species richness. However, in the presence of ants, birds increased diversity, evenness, and richness. Effects on arthropod composition mirrored diversity: birds alone had no effect on composition, ants alone increased aphid and aphid predator abundance, but in the presence of ants, birds reduced aphid and aphid predator abundance. In summary, we provide evidence that mutualists reduce diversity and alter community composition in pine-associated arthropods by promoting the dominance of partner species, and these interactions together are non-additive, with predator effects likely working through the disruption of the mutualism.</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"106 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecy.70120","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.70120","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Predators are recognized to increase prey diversity by suppressing competitively dominant species, whereas mutualists are predicted to reduce diversity by promoting a competitively dominant partner. However, this trend, and the effect of these interactions when they cooccur, remains underexplored. We investigated the effects of predation and mutualism on the diversity of pine-associated arthropods by excluding insectivorous birds and mutualist ants from branches of Pinus ponderosa and sampling arthropods during a 2-year period. We identified 92,549 arthropods to the species or morphological species level. In the absence of ants, birds had no effects on diversity, whereas in the absence of birds, ants decreased Simpson diversity and Pieolu's evenness but did not affect species richness. However, in the presence of ants, birds increased diversity, evenness, and richness. Effects on arthropod composition mirrored diversity: birds alone had no effect on composition, ants alone increased aphid and aphid predator abundance, but in the presence of ants, birds reduced aphid and aphid predator abundance. In summary, we provide evidence that mutualists reduce diversity and alter community composition in pine-associated arthropods by promoting the dominance of partner species, and these interactions together are non-additive, with predator effects likely working through the disruption of the mutualism.

Abstract Image

互食和捕食对松林节肢动物群落多样性的影响有显著差异
捕食者被认为通过抑制竞争优势物种来增加猎物多样性,而共生者被认为通过促进竞争优势物种来减少多样性。然而,这一趋势以及这些相互作用发生时的影响仍未得到充分探讨。在2年的时间里,我们通过对黄松枝和节肢动物取样,排除食虫鸟类和共生蚁,研究了捕食和共生对松树相关节肢动物多样性的影响。在种或形态种水平上鉴定出节肢动物92549种。在没有蚂蚁的情况下,鸟类对物种多样性没有影响,而在没有鸟类的情况下,蚂蚁降低了Simpson多样性和Pieolu的均匀度,但不影响物种丰富度。然而,在蚂蚁的存在下,鸟类增加了多样性、均匀性和丰富性。对节肢动物组成的影响反映了物种多样性:鸟类对节肢动物组成没有影响,蚂蚁增加了蚜虫和蚜虫捕食者的丰度,而蚂蚁存在时,鸟类减少了蚜虫和蚜虫捕食者的丰度。总之,我们提供的证据表明,互惠主义者通过促进伴侣物种的优势地位来减少松树相关节肢动物的多样性并改变群落组成,这些相互作用在一起是非加性的,捕食者效应可能通过破坏互惠主义而起作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecology
Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
332
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Ecology publishes articles that report on the basic elements of ecological research. Emphasis is placed on concise, clear articles documenting important ecological phenomena. The journal publishes a broad array of research that includes a rapidly expanding envelope of subject matter, techniques, approaches, and concepts: paleoecology through present-day phenomena; evolutionary, population, physiological, community, and ecosystem ecology, as well as biogeochemistry; inclusive of descriptive, comparative, experimental, mathematical, statistical, and interdisciplinary approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信