Dynamic balance and mobility during pregnancy

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Breanna R. Dumke , Lauren H. Theilen , Janet M. Shaw , K. Bo Foreman , Leland E. Dibble , Peter C. Fino
{"title":"Dynamic balance and mobility during pregnancy","authors":"Breanna R. Dumke ,&nbsp;Lauren H. Theilen ,&nbsp;Janet M. Shaw ,&nbsp;K. Bo Foreman ,&nbsp;Leland E. Dibble ,&nbsp;Peter C. Fino","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Approximately 25 % of pregnant people fall during the course of their pregnancy. While most falls during pregnancy occur during complex, dynamic movements, prior research on balance in pregnant people has largely focused on static posture. The present study aims to investigate dynamic balance and mobility throughout gestation by examining relatively more complex movements than traditional assessments of gait and balance in pregnant people. It is the first study to quantify two common clinical tests, the tandem gait test and the Timed Up and Go test, that assess mobility and fall risk via IMUs within pregnancy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 30 pregnant people (1st trimester: <em>n</em> = 10, 2nd trimester: n = 10, 3rd trimester: n = 10) and 10 healthy nonpregnant control females completed a tandem gait test and the Timed Up and Go test. Time to completion and measures of movement quality such as smoothness, peak turning speed, and mediolateral sway via the root mean square of center of mass acceleration, obtained through inertial measurement units (Opal v2, APDM Inc.), were compared between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Overall, pregnant individuals completed both tests slower as gestational age increased. Pregnant people also demonstrated a similar movement quality, to healthy controls, rather than maintaining movement speed.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>We speculate that reduced movement speed may be a compensatory strategy used during pregnancy to safely move despite increased mass and limited thoracopelvic rotations. Altogether, these findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the context-dependent effects of pregnancy on dynamic balance and mobility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50992,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biomechanics","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 106596"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026800332500169X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Approximately 25 % of pregnant people fall during the course of their pregnancy. While most falls during pregnancy occur during complex, dynamic movements, prior research on balance in pregnant people has largely focused on static posture. The present study aims to investigate dynamic balance and mobility throughout gestation by examining relatively more complex movements than traditional assessments of gait and balance in pregnant people. It is the first study to quantify two common clinical tests, the tandem gait test and the Timed Up and Go test, that assess mobility and fall risk via IMUs within pregnancy.

Methods

A total of 30 pregnant people (1st trimester: n = 10, 2nd trimester: n = 10, 3rd trimester: n = 10) and 10 healthy nonpregnant control females completed a tandem gait test and the Timed Up and Go test. Time to completion and measures of movement quality such as smoothness, peak turning speed, and mediolateral sway via the root mean square of center of mass acceleration, obtained through inertial measurement units (Opal v2, APDM Inc.), were compared between groups.

Findings

Overall, pregnant individuals completed both tests slower as gestational age increased. Pregnant people also demonstrated a similar movement quality, to healthy controls, rather than maintaining movement speed.

Interpretation

We speculate that reduced movement speed may be a compensatory strategy used during pregnancy to safely move despite increased mass and limited thoracopelvic rotations. Altogether, these findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the context-dependent effects of pregnancy on dynamic balance and mobility.
怀孕期间的动态平衡和活动能力
大约25%的孕妇在怀孕期间跌倒。虽然大多数怀孕期间跌倒发生在复杂的动态运动中,但之前对孕妇平衡的研究主要集中在静态姿势上。本研究旨在研究动态平衡和流动性在整个妊娠过程中,通过检查相对更复杂的运动比传统的评估步态和平衡孕妇。这是第一个量化两项常见临床测试的研究,即串联步态测试和定时起身和行走测试,这两项测试通过imu评估妊娠期间的活动能力和跌倒风险。方法选取30例孕妇(妊娠早期10例,妊娠中期10例,妊娠晚期10例)和10例健康非妊娠对照女性,分别进行串联步态测试和定时起床测试。通过惯性测量单元(Opal v2, APDM Inc.)获得的质心加速度均方根,比较各组完成时间和运动质量指标,如平稳性、峰值转弯速度和中外侧摆动。总的来说,随着孕龄的增加,孕妇完成这两项测试的速度变慢了。孕妇也表现出与健康对照组相似的运动质量,而不是保持运动速度。解释:我们推测,降低移动速度可能是怀孕期间使用的一种代偿策略,尽管体重增加和胸骨盆旋转受限,但仍可安全移动。总之,这些发现有助于更深入地了解怀孕对动态平衡和活动能力的环境依赖性影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Biomechanics
Clinical Biomechanics 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
189
审稿时长
12.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Biomechanics is an international multidisciplinary journal of biomechanics with a focus on medical and clinical applications of new knowledge in the field. The science of biomechanics helps explain the causes of cell, tissue, organ and body system disorders, and supports clinicians in the diagnosis, prognosis and evaluation of treatment methods and technologies. Clinical Biomechanics aims to strengthen the links between laboratory and clinic by publishing cutting-edge biomechanics research which helps to explain the causes of injury and disease, and which provides evidence contributing to improved clinical management. A rigorous peer review system is employed and every attempt is made to process and publish top-quality papers promptly. Clinical Biomechanics explores all facets of body system, organ, tissue and cell biomechanics, with an emphasis on medical and clinical applications of the basic science aspects. The role of basic science is therefore recognized in a medical or clinical context. The readership of the journal closely reflects its multi-disciplinary contents, being a balance of scientists, engineers and clinicians. The contents are in the form of research papers, brief reports, review papers and correspondence, whilst special interest issues and supplements are published from time to time. Disciplines covered include biomechanics and mechanobiology at all scales, bioengineering and use of tissue engineering and biomaterials for clinical applications, biophysics, as well as biomechanical aspects of medical robotics, ergonomics, physical and occupational therapeutics and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信