{"title":"Developing a deep learning-based surgical-skill assessment model focused on instrument handling in laparoscopic colorectal surgery","authors":"Kei Nakajima , Shin Takenaka , Daichi Kitaguchi , Atsuki Tanaka , Kyoko Ryu , Nobuyoshi Takeshita , Yusuke Kinugasa , Masaaki Ito","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Poor instrument handling, such as \"repeatedly makes tentative or awkward moves\" and \"grasper (frequently) slip,\" is associated with poor surgical skills. We constructed and applied an automated recognition model of tissue grasping during laparoscopic surgery using computer vision technology to clarify whether automated surgical-skill assessment using the number of tissue grasps could be feasible.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The number of tissue grasps and classification of success/failure were manually and automatically counted. Intraoperative videos of three groups with obviously different surgical levels (the high-, intermediate-, and low-skill groups) were prepared; an automated distinction between these groups was attempted using the models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The number of manually counted tissue grasps was significantly higher in the low-skill group than in the other groups, while the number of failed tissue grasps was significantly lower in the high-skill group than in the other groups. The number of automatically counted tissue grasps showed strong correlations with the manually counted ones, whereas the other parameters showed only moderate correlations. The number of automatically counted tissue grasps was significantly higher in the low-skill group than in the other groups, similar to that noted with manual counting. The other automatic parameters showed no results similar to the manual ones.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We successfully constructed automated recognition models of tissue grasping during laparoscopic surgery and found that automated surgical-skill assessment based on the number of tissue grasps could be feasible. However, the results were insufficient for automatically distinguishing between successful/failed tissue grasps. Further improvements in recognition accuracy are required for this model.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"51 9","pages":"Article 110260"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejso","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748798325006882","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Poor instrument handling, such as "repeatedly makes tentative or awkward moves" and "grasper (frequently) slip," is associated with poor surgical skills. We constructed and applied an automated recognition model of tissue grasping during laparoscopic surgery using computer vision technology to clarify whether automated surgical-skill assessment using the number of tissue grasps could be feasible.
Methods
The number of tissue grasps and classification of success/failure were manually and automatically counted. Intraoperative videos of three groups with obviously different surgical levels (the high-, intermediate-, and low-skill groups) were prepared; an automated distinction between these groups was attempted using the models.
Results
The number of manually counted tissue grasps was significantly higher in the low-skill group than in the other groups, while the number of failed tissue grasps was significantly lower in the high-skill group than in the other groups. The number of automatically counted tissue grasps showed strong correlations with the manually counted ones, whereas the other parameters showed only moderate correlations. The number of automatically counted tissue grasps was significantly higher in the low-skill group than in the other groups, similar to that noted with manual counting. The other automatic parameters showed no results similar to the manual ones.
Conclusion
We successfully constructed automated recognition models of tissue grasping during laparoscopic surgery and found that automated surgical-skill assessment based on the number of tissue grasps could be feasible. However, the results were insufficient for automatically distinguishing between successful/failed tissue grasps. Further improvements in recognition accuracy are required for this model.
期刊介绍:
JSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology ("the Journal of Cancer Surgery") is the Official Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and BASO ~ the Association for Cancer Surgery.
The EJSO aims to advance surgical oncology research and practice through the publication of original research articles, review articles, editorials, debates and correspondence.