{"title":"Investment, Tobin’s q, and the stochastic price of fossil fuel","authors":"Juan Peng , Jinqiang Yang , Pengxiang Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fossil fuel power companies’ production exposes them to carbon risk. Despite extensive empirical research on carbon risk impacts, theoretical frameworks embedding stochastic fossil fuel price dynamics into corporate investment decisions remain scarce. We address this gap by examining the impact of stochastic fossil fuel prices on corporate investment and firm value within a neoclassical <span><math><mi>q</mi></math></span>-theoretic framework. We show that stochastic fossil fuel prices have important implications for investment and Tobin’s <span><math><mi>q</mi></math></span>. Quantitatively, fluctuations in fossil fuel prices once drove the average <span><math><mi>q</mi></math></span> value down below unity, and a firm that ignores price volatility may misallocate investments, leading to a potential reduction in firm value by more than 42%. Value erosion exhibits disproportionate intensity decay, with a halved investment–capital ratio associated with an already 32% depletion. Qualitatively, fossil fuel price volatility persistently depresses Tobin’s <span><math><mi>q</mi></math></span>, inducing strategic disinvestment as firms postpone capital expenditures to mitigate uncertainty. We use duration to quantify the sensitivity of firm value to price volatility, decomposing assets-in-place and growth opportunities. Finally, we generalize the model to incorporate asymmetric adjustment costs and irreversibility. We find that inaction is optimal response which are pertinent to empirical analysis, especially when firms face high capital adjustment costs. Our model suggests that firms should integrate fossil fuel price volatility into strategy to mitigate risks associated with carbon regulation and market fluctuations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"148 ","pages":"Article 108553"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325003779","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Fossil fuel power companies’ production exposes them to carbon risk. Despite extensive empirical research on carbon risk impacts, theoretical frameworks embedding stochastic fossil fuel price dynamics into corporate investment decisions remain scarce. We address this gap by examining the impact of stochastic fossil fuel prices on corporate investment and firm value within a neoclassical -theoretic framework. We show that stochastic fossil fuel prices have important implications for investment and Tobin’s . Quantitatively, fluctuations in fossil fuel prices once drove the average value down below unity, and a firm that ignores price volatility may misallocate investments, leading to a potential reduction in firm value by more than 42%. Value erosion exhibits disproportionate intensity decay, with a halved investment–capital ratio associated with an already 32% depletion. Qualitatively, fossil fuel price volatility persistently depresses Tobin’s , inducing strategic disinvestment as firms postpone capital expenditures to mitigate uncertainty. We use duration to quantify the sensitivity of firm value to price volatility, decomposing assets-in-place and growth opportunities. Finally, we generalize the model to incorporate asymmetric adjustment costs and irreversibility. We find that inaction is optimal response which are pertinent to empirical analysis, especially when firms face high capital adjustment costs. Our model suggests that firms should integrate fossil fuel price volatility into strategy to mitigate risks associated with carbon regulation and market fluctuations.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.