Anthony Onoja,Thomas McDonnell,Isabelle Annessi,Rosamonde E Banks,Marianne Bergin,Paul Cockwell,Rodolphe Dusaulcy,Simon D S Fraser,Tim Johnson,Philip A Kalra,Barbara Lemaître,Moin Saleem,Phillipp Skroblin,Magnus Soderberg,Maarten W Taal,Robert J Unwin,Nicolas Vuilleumier,David C Wheeler,Nophar Geifman
{"title":"Biomarkers of Kidney Failure and All-Cause Mortality in CKD.","authors":"Anthony Onoja,Thomas McDonnell,Isabelle Annessi,Rosamonde E Banks,Marianne Bergin,Paul Cockwell,Rodolphe Dusaulcy,Simon D S Fraser,Tim Johnson,Philip A Kalra,Barbara Lemaître,Moin Saleem,Phillipp Skroblin,Magnus Soderberg,Maarten W Taal,Robert J Unwin,Nicolas Vuilleumier,David C Wheeler,Nophar Geifman","doi":"10.1681/asn.0000000767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nChronic kidney disease (CKD) carries a variable risk for multiple adverse outcomes, highlighting the need for a personalised approach. This study evaluated several novel biomarkers linked to key disease mechanisms to predict the risk of kidney failure (first event of eGFR <15 ml/min/1.73m2 or kidney replacement therapy), all-cause mortality, and a composite of both.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe included 2,884 adults with non-dialysis CKD from 16 nephrology centres across the UK. Twenty-one biomarkers associated with kidney damage, fibrosis, inflammation, and cardiovascular disease were analysed in urine, plasma, or serum. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess biomarker associations and develop risk prediction models.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nParticipants had mean age 63 (15) years, 58% were male and 87% White. Median eGFR 35 (25, 47) ml/min/1.73m2, and median urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) 197 (32, 895) mg/g. During median 48 (33, 55) months follow-up, 680 kidney failure events and 414 all-cause mortality events occurred. For kidney failure, a model combining three biomarkers (sTNFR1, sCD40, UCOL1A1) showed good discrimination (c-index 0.86, 95% CI: 0.83-0.89) but was outperformed by a model using established risk factors (age, sex, ethnicity, eGFR, UACR; c-index 0.90, 95% CI: 0.88-0.92). For all-cause mortality, a model using three biomarkers (hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP, suPAR) demonstrated equivalent discrimination (c-index 0.80, 95% CI: 0.75-0.84) to an established risk factor model (c-index 0.80, 95% CI: 0.76-0.84).For the composite outcome, the biomarker model discrimination (C-index 0.78, 95% CI: 0.76, 0.81) was numerically higher than for established risk factors (C-index 0.77, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.80), and the addition of biomarkers to the established risk factors led to a small but statistically significant improvement in discrimination (C-index 0.80, 95% CI: 0.77, 0.82; p value < 0.01).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nRisk prediction models incorporating novel biomarkers showed comparable discrimination to established risk factors for kidney failure and all-cause mortality.","PeriodicalId":17217,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Society of Nephrology","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The American Society of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.0000000767","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) carries a variable risk for multiple adverse outcomes, highlighting the need for a personalised approach. This study evaluated several novel biomarkers linked to key disease mechanisms to predict the risk of kidney failure (first event of eGFR <15 ml/min/1.73m2 or kidney replacement therapy), all-cause mortality, and a composite of both.
METHODS
We included 2,884 adults with non-dialysis CKD from 16 nephrology centres across the UK. Twenty-one biomarkers associated with kidney damage, fibrosis, inflammation, and cardiovascular disease were analysed in urine, plasma, or serum. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess biomarker associations and develop risk prediction models.
RESULTS
Participants had mean age 63 (15) years, 58% were male and 87% White. Median eGFR 35 (25, 47) ml/min/1.73m2, and median urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) 197 (32, 895) mg/g. During median 48 (33, 55) months follow-up, 680 kidney failure events and 414 all-cause mortality events occurred. For kidney failure, a model combining three biomarkers (sTNFR1, sCD40, UCOL1A1) showed good discrimination (c-index 0.86, 95% CI: 0.83-0.89) but was outperformed by a model using established risk factors (age, sex, ethnicity, eGFR, UACR; c-index 0.90, 95% CI: 0.88-0.92). For all-cause mortality, a model using three biomarkers (hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP, suPAR) demonstrated equivalent discrimination (c-index 0.80, 95% CI: 0.75-0.84) to an established risk factor model (c-index 0.80, 95% CI: 0.76-0.84).For the composite outcome, the biomarker model discrimination (C-index 0.78, 95% CI: 0.76, 0.81) was numerically higher than for established risk factors (C-index 0.77, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.80), and the addition of biomarkers to the established risk factors led to a small but statistically significant improvement in discrimination (C-index 0.80, 95% CI: 0.77, 0.82; p value < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS
Risk prediction models incorporating novel biomarkers showed comparable discrimination to established risk factors for kidney failure and all-cause mortality.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (JASN) stands as the preeminent kidney journal globally, offering an exceptional synthesis of cutting-edge basic research, clinical epidemiology, meta-analysis, and relevant editorial content. Representing a comprehensive resource, JASN encompasses clinical research, editorials distilling key findings, perspectives, and timely reviews.
Editorials are skillfully crafted to elucidate the essential insights of the parent article, while JASN actively encourages the submission of Letters to the Editor discussing recently published articles. The reviews featured in JASN are consistently erudite and comprehensive, providing thorough coverage of respective fields. Since its inception in July 1990, JASN has been a monthly publication.
JASN publishes original research reports and editorial content across a spectrum of basic and clinical science relevant to the broad discipline of nephrology. Topics covered include renal cell biology, developmental biology of the kidney, genetics of kidney disease, cell and transport physiology, hemodynamics and vascular regulation, mechanisms of blood pressure regulation, renal immunology, kidney pathology, pathophysiology of kidney diseases, nephrolithiasis, clinical nephrology (including dialysis and transplantation), and hypertension. Furthermore, articles addressing healthcare policy and care delivery issues relevant to nephrology are warmly welcomed.