Myroslav Solonko, Erik Regidor, Alberto Ortiz‐Vigón, Eduardo Montero, Blanca Vilchez, Mariano Sanz
{"title":"Surgical Treatment of Peri‐Implantitis Combined With Keratinized Mucosa Augmentation: Results of a Dual‐Center 3‐Year RCT","authors":"Myroslav Solonko, Erik Regidor, Alberto Ortiz‐Vigón, Eduardo Montero, Blanca Vilchez, Mariano Sanz","doi":"10.1111/clr.14465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AimTo evaluate the medium‐term efficacy of using a xenogeneic collagen matrix to augment the width of the peri‐implant keratinized mucosa (PIKM) as an adjunct to the surgical treatment of peri‐implantitis.Material and MethodsIn this 36‐month parallel‐arm randomized controlled clinical trial, patients with peri‐implantitis were randomly assigned to a combined protocol of resective peri‐implantitis surgery and a PIKM augmentation procedure, either with an autologous free gingival graft (FGG) or a collagen matrix (CM). Primary outcomes were the increase in the width of PIKM and probing pocket depth (PPD) reduction at 36 months. As secondary outcomes, radiographic and patient‐reported outcomes were assessed.ResultsForty‐one patients (20 in the CM group and 21 in the FGG group) completed the three‐year follow‐up. PIKM increased in both groups, but the increase was significantly higher in the APF (apically positioned flap) + FGG group compared to the APF + CM group [2.0 (95% CI: 1.3, 2.7) mm in the FGG group compared to 1.0 (95% CI: 0.5, 1.5) mm in the CM group; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.048]. PPDs were reduced by 1.5 mm (95% CI: 1.1, 1.9) and 1.4 mm (95% CI: 0.6, 2.2), respectively. Disease resolution (maximum one site with bleeding on probing, no suppuration, no further bone loss > 0.5 mm, and PD ≤ 5 mm) was 47.6% in the FGG group and 35.0% in the CM group.ConclusionTested surgical modalities resulted in similar improvements in the clinical parameters. Both FGG and CM increased the PIKM, but PIKM was greater at the 36‐month examination in the FGG group.","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14465","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AimTo evaluate the medium‐term efficacy of using a xenogeneic collagen matrix to augment the width of the peri‐implant keratinized mucosa (PIKM) as an adjunct to the surgical treatment of peri‐implantitis.Material and MethodsIn this 36‐month parallel‐arm randomized controlled clinical trial, patients with peri‐implantitis were randomly assigned to a combined protocol of resective peri‐implantitis surgery and a PIKM augmentation procedure, either with an autologous free gingival graft (FGG) or a collagen matrix (CM). Primary outcomes were the increase in the width of PIKM and probing pocket depth (PPD) reduction at 36 months. As secondary outcomes, radiographic and patient‐reported outcomes were assessed.ResultsForty‐one patients (20 in the CM group and 21 in the FGG group) completed the three‐year follow‐up. PIKM increased in both groups, but the increase was significantly higher in the APF (apically positioned flap) + FGG group compared to the APF + CM group [2.0 (95% CI: 1.3, 2.7) mm in the FGG group compared to 1.0 (95% CI: 0.5, 1.5) mm in the CM group; p = 0.048]. PPDs were reduced by 1.5 mm (95% CI: 1.1, 1.9) and 1.4 mm (95% CI: 0.6, 2.2), respectively. Disease resolution (maximum one site with bleeding on probing, no suppuration, no further bone loss > 0.5 mm, and PD ≤ 5 mm) was 47.6% in the FGG group and 35.0% in the CM group.ConclusionTested surgical modalities resulted in similar improvements in the clinical parameters. Both FGG and CM increased the PIKM, but PIKM was greater at the 36‐month examination in the FGG group.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Oral Implants Research conveys scientific progress in the field of implant dentistry and its related areas to clinicians, teachers and researchers concerned with the application of this information for the benefit of patients in need of oral implants. The journal addresses itself to clinicians, general practitioners, periodontists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and prosthodontists, as well as to teachers, academicians and scholars involved in the education of professionals and in the scientific promotion of the field of implant dentistry.