Daniel J. Benedetti, Nicholas G. Cost, Peter F. Ehrlich, Nicholas Evageliou, Elizabeth Fialkowski, Lauren N. Parsons, Kelly L. Vallance, Lindsay A. Renfro, Andrew L. Hong, Jennifer H. Aldrink, Luke Pater, Arnold C. Paulino, Jesse K. Sandberg, Ethan A. Smith, Amy L. Treece, Jeffrey S. Dome, James I. Geller, Elizabeth A. Mullen
{"title":"Updated favourable-histology Wilms tumour risk stratification: rationale for future Children’s Oncology Group clinical trials","authors":"Daniel J. Benedetti, Nicholas G. Cost, Peter F. Ehrlich, Nicholas Evageliou, Elizabeth Fialkowski, Lauren N. Parsons, Kelly L. Vallance, Lindsay A. Renfro, Andrew L. Hong, Jennifer H. Aldrink, Luke Pater, Arnold C. Paulino, Jesse K. Sandberg, Ethan A. Smith, Amy L. Treece, Jeffrey S. Dome, James I. Geller, Elizabeth A. Mullen","doi":"10.1038/s41585-025-01055-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Patients with Wilms tumour have benefited from the results of decades of large collaborative clinical trials, leading to improved care. In the National Wilms Tumor Study Group and now Children’s Oncology Group (COG) trials, risk stratification evolved and expanded with each generation of studies and, therefore, ensuring that each patient receives the appropriate therapy has become increasingly complex. A new risk stratification system has been developed that forms the basis of the upcoming COG favourable-histology Wilms tumour (FHWT) study. Topics of diagnostic and prognostic uncertainty, such as the findings of tumour pulmonary emboli or extra-abdominal lymphadenopathy at diagnosis, will be integrated into the central review determination of staging of FHWT by committee consensus to facilitate clinical classification for therapeutic studies. Clear documentation of the elements of current risk stratification are of particular importance as refinement of the classification of patients with FHWT continues in an effort to optimize research, personalize treatment and provide an educational resource.</p>","PeriodicalId":19088,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Urology","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-025-01055-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Patients with Wilms tumour have benefited from the results of decades of large collaborative clinical trials, leading to improved care. In the National Wilms Tumor Study Group and now Children’s Oncology Group (COG) trials, risk stratification evolved and expanded with each generation of studies and, therefore, ensuring that each patient receives the appropriate therapy has become increasingly complex. A new risk stratification system has been developed that forms the basis of the upcoming COG favourable-histology Wilms tumour (FHWT) study. Topics of diagnostic and prognostic uncertainty, such as the findings of tumour pulmonary emboli or extra-abdominal lymphadenopathy at diagnosis, will be integrated into the central review determination of staging of FHWT by committee consensus to facilitate clinical classification for therapeutic studies. Clear documentation of the elements of current risk stratification are of particular importance as refinement of the classification of patients with FHWT continues in an effort to optimize research, personalize treatment and provide an educational resource.
期刊介绍:
Nature Reviews Urology is part of the Nature Reviews portfolio of journals.Nature Reviews' basic, translational and clinical content is written by internationally renowned basic and clinical academics and researchers. This journal targeted readers in the biological and medical sciences, from the postgraduate level upwards, aiming to be accessible to professionals in any biological or medical discipline.
The journal features authoritative In-depth Reviews providing up-to-date information on topics within a field's history and development. Perspectives, News & Views articles, and the Research Highlights section offer topical discussions and opinions, filtering primary research from various medical journals.
Covering a wide range of subjects, including andrology, urologic oncology, and imaging, Nature Reviews provides valuable insights for practitioners, researchers, and academics within urology and related fields.