Meaningful inclusion of people with dementia in interview research: adopting the "intentional stance".

Frontiers in dementia Pub Date : 2025-06-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frdem.2025.1596393
Emma O'Shea, Suzanne Timmons, Kate Irving
{"title":"Meaningful inclusion of people with dementia in interview research: adopting the \"intentional stance\".","authors":"Emma O'Shea, Suzanne Timmons, Kate Irving","doi":"10.3389/frdem.2025.1596393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Engaging people living with dementia in interview research presents unique ethical, methodological, and practical challenges. In recent years there is an increased recognition of the importance and value of meaningfully including people with dementia in research, and of the epistemic injustice of systematic exclusion. While there are a growing number of research papers suggesting strategies for fostering ethical and meaningful inclusion, this area is still very much in development, theoretically and methodologically. This paper outlines how a theoretical perspective on selfhood in dementia, which incorporates the concept of the \"Intentional Stance\" (as per Sabat), may be a useful means of reaching people with dementia in a meaningful way via open, curious and personhood-supporting interactions. Embodying the \"intentional stance\" refers to operating under the assumption that all behavior and interactions do have meaning(s), even if it is not immediately or intuitively evident to the researcher what the meaning(s) are. Here, we draw on excerpts from an interview I conducted with a person living with dementia about his experiences of and perspectives on respite and day services, using the intentional stance, in conjunction with a range of other strategies for maximizing reciprocal communication. The analysis highlights instances where the intentional stance was central to connecting with the person, and temporarily entering their lifeworld. Adopting this stance is a means of reducing the epistemic injustice that people with dementia have faced, through longstanding omission and exclusion from research, and from social spheres more broadly.</p>","PeriodicalId":520000,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in dementia","volume":"4 ","pages":"1596393"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12176766/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in dementia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frdem.2025.1596393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Engaging people living with dementia in interview research presents unique ethical, methodological, and practical challenges. In recent years there is an increased recognition of the importance and value of meaningfully including people with dementia in research, and of the epistemic injustice of systematic exclusion. While there are a growing number of research papers suggesting strategies for fostering ethical and meaningful inclusion, this area is still very much in development, theoretically and methodologically. This paper outlines how a theoretical perspective on selfhood in dementia, which incorporates the concept of the "Intentional Stance" (as per Sabat), may be a useful means of reaching people with dementia in a meaningful way via open, curious and personhood-supporting interactions. Embodying the "intentional stance" refers to operating under the assumption that all behavior and interactions do have meaning(s), even if it is not immediately or intuitively evident to the researcher what the meaning(s) are. Here, we draw on excerpts from an interview I conducted with a person living with dementia about his experiences of and perspectives on respite and day services, using the intentional stance, in conjunction with a range of other strategies for maximizing reciprocal communication. The analysis highlights instances where the intentional stance was central to connecting with the person, and temporarily entering their lifeworld. Adopting this stance is a means of reducing the epistemic injustice that people with dementia have faced, through longstanding omission and exclusion from research, and from social spheres more broadly.

在访谈研究中有意地纳入痴呆症患者:采用“有意立场”。
让痴呆症患者参与访谈研究提出了独特的伦理、方法和实践挑战。近年来,人们越来越认识到有意义地将痴呆症患者纳入研究的重要性和价值,以及系统性排斥的认知不公。虽然有越来越多的研究论文提出了促进道德和有意义的包容的策略,但这一领域在理论上和方法上仍处于发展阶段。这篇论文概述了一个关于痴呆症的自我的理论观点,它包含了“故意立场”的概念(根据Sabat),可能是一种有用的手段,通过开放、好奇和支持人格的互动,以有意义的方式接触痴呆症患者。体现“有意立场”是指在假设所有行为和互动都有意义的前提下进行操作,即使研究人员无法立即或直观地看出意义是什么。在这里,我们摘录了我对一位痴呆症患者的采访,了解他对喘息和日间服务的经历和看法,使用有意的立场,结合一系列其他策略来最大化互惠沟通。分析强调了一些例子,在这些例子中,有意识的姿态对于与人建立联系、暂时进入他们的生活世界至关重要。采取这一立场是减少痴呆症患者长期被忽视和排除在研究和更广泛的社会领域之外所面临的认知不公正的一种手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信