Avian spring migration at the east Adriatic coast: coastal and sea-crossing dynamics of intensity, timing, and flight directions.

IF 3.4 1区 生物学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Simon Hirschhofer, Peter Ranacher, Barbara Helm, Davor Ćiković, Robert Weibel, Sanja Barišić, Vesna Tutiš, Louie Taylor, Maja Bjelić Laušić, Baptiste Schmid
{"title":"Avian spring migration at the east Adriatic coast: coastal and sea-crossing dynamics of intensity, timing, and flight directions.","authors":"Simon Hirschhofer, Peter Ranacher, Barbara Helm, Davor Ćiković, Robert Weibel, Sanja Barišić, Vesna Tutiš, Louie Taylor, Maja Bjelić Laušić, Baptiste Schmid","doi":"10.1186/s40462-025-00572-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Each spring, migratory birds converge along the Croatian coast from various directions, creating a dynamic intersection of flight paths. Many birds are thought to cross the Adriatic Sea, while others follow a northward route along the coastline. As most migratory birds initiate flight shortly after sunset, we hypothesized that sea-crossing migrants would arrive with a delay at the Croatian coast, compared to migrants that were following the coast, resulting in potentially intricate spatiotemporal patterns that remain poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We deployed four ornithological radar devices along the Croatian coastline: two in southwestern Istria and two in northern Dalmatia. These radars tracked migratory bird activity up to 1000 m above ground, recording intensity and flight directions and their variations across sites, seasons, and individual nights. We conducted an exploratory analysis of these variations, applied functional principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering to summarise within-night activity profiles, and compared these profiles between sites and across the migration season, alongside associated flight direction distributions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the early migration season, migration intensity was similar across all technically active sites, but site-to-site variation increased markedly in May. In March, flight directions were predominantly towards NNE, indicating mainly sea-crossing migration throughout the night. In April, NW directions dominated the first half of the night, shifting to scattered N directions later; in Dalmatia, even strong W components were observed early in the night. By May, W to NW movement towards the Italian coast were typical for early-night activity. Later in the night, flight directions shifted towards NE over Istria and N at the Dalmatian site in Zadar, while the site at Vrana exhibited a wide scatter, warranting further discussion. Contrary to our expectations, within-night intensity profiles could not be fully linked to specific directional patterns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study points to the complex interplay between coastal and sea-crossing migration along the Croatian coast. Our results demonstrate significant variability in the timing of migration within single nights in the context of aquatic barriers. Crossing such a barrier results in downstream delays compared to birds migrating along the barrier. Between nights, one behaviour or the other may dominate the overall activity, causing the shifts in within-night timing. In addition, barrier crossing is likely to be strongly influenced by weather conditions, contributing to the variability in the within-night timing of migration. However, measured flight directions were not always consistent with within-night timing, highlighting the complexity of avian migration in the context of aquatic barriers. This highlights the need for further research with high temporal resolution to gain a deeper understanding of migration behaviour in response to such barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":54288,"journal":{"name":"Movement Ecology","volume":"13 1","pages":"44"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12180248/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-025-00572-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Each spring, migratory birds converge along the Croatian coast from various directions, creating a dynamic intersection of flight paths. Many birds are thought to cross the Adriatic Sea, while others follow a northward route along the coastline. As most migratory birds initiate flight shortly after sunset, we hypothesized that sea-crossing migrants would arrive with a delay at the Croatian coast, compared to migrants that were following the coast, resulting in potentially intricate spatiotemporal patterns that remain poorly understood.

Methods: We deployed four ornithological radar devices along the Croatian coastline: two in southwestern Istria and two in northern Dalmatia. These radars tracked migratory bird activity up to 1000 m above ground, recording intensity and flight directions and their variations across sites, seasons, and individual nights. We conducted an exploratory analysis of these variations, applied functional principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering to summarise within-night activity profiles, and compared these profiles between sites and across the migration season, alongside associated flight direction distributions.

Results: During the early migration season, migration intensity was similar across all technically active sites, but site-to-site variation increased markedly in May. In March, flight directions were predominantly towards NNE, indicating mainly sea-crossing migration throughout the night. In April, NW directions dominated the first half of the night, shifting to scattered N directions later; in Dalmatia, even strong W components were observed early in the night. By May, W to NW movement towards the Italian coast were typical for early-night activity. Later in the night, flight directions shifted towards NE over Istria and N at the Dalmatian site in Zadar, while the site at Vrana exhibited a wide scatter, warranting further discussion. Contrary to our expectations, within-night intensity profiles could not be fully linked to specific directional patterns.

Conclusion: This study points to the complex interplay between coastal and sea-crossing migration along the Croatian coast. Our results demonstrate significant variability in the timing of migration within single nights in the context of aquatic barriers. Crossing such a barrier results in downstream delays compared to birds migrating along the barrier. Between nights, one behaviour or the other may dominate the overall activity, causing the shifts in within-night timing. In addition, barrier crossing is likely to be strongly influenced by weather conditions, contributing to the variability in the within-night timing of migration. However, measured flight directions were not always consistent with within-night timing, highlighting the complexity of avian migration in the context of aquatic barriers. This highlights the need for further research with high temporal resolution to gain a deeper understanding of migration behaviour in response to such barriers.

亚得里亚海东部海岸的鸟类春季迁徙:强度、时间和飞行方向的沿海和海洋穿越动力学。
背景:每年春天,候鸟从不同的方向沿着克罗地亚海岸聚集,形成了一个动态的飞行路径交叉点。据认为,许多鸟类会穿越亚得里亚海,而另一些则沿着海岸线向北迁徙。由于大多数候鸟在日落后不久开始飞行,我们假设,与沿着海岸的候鸟相比,穿越海洋的候鸟会延迟到达克罗地亚海岸,导致潜在的复杂时空模式仍然知之甚少。方法:我们沿着克罗地亚海岸线部署了四个鸟类雷达设备:两个在伊斯特拉岛西南部,两个在达尔马提亚北部。这些雷达可以追踪距离地面1000米的候鸟活动,记录强度和飞行方向以及它们在不同地点、季节和单个夜晚的变化。我们对这些变化进行了探索性分析,应用功能主成分分析和分层聚类来总结夜间活动概况,并比较了不同地点和整个迁徙季节的这些概况,以及相关的飞行方向分布。结果:在早期迁徙季节,所有技术活跃地点的迁徙强度相似,但在5月份,不同地点之间的差异显著增加。三月份的飞行方向主要是向东北偏北,表明夜间主要是越海迁徙。4月前半夜以西北方向为主,后半夜转向偏北方向;在达尔马提亚,甚至在夜间早期观察到强烈的W成分。到5月,朝意大利海岸的西向西北移动是典型的夜间活动。晚些时候,飞行方向在伊斯特里亚上空转向东北,在扎达尔的达尔马提亚地点转向北,而在弗拉纳地点则显示出广泛的分散,值得进一步讨论。与我们的预期相反,夜间强度曲线不能完全与特定的方向模式联系起来。结论:本研究指出沿克罗地亚海岸的沿海和渡海迁移之间复杂的相互作用。我们的研究结果表明,在水生屏障的背景下,单个晚上的迁徙时间有显著的可变性。与沿着屏障迁徙的鸟类相比,穿越这样的屏障会导致下游的延迟。在夜间之间,一种行为或另一种行为可能主导整体活动,导致夜间时间的变化。此外,穿越屏障很可能受到天气条件的强烈影响,从而导致夜间迁徙时间的变化。然而,测量的飞行方向并不总是与夜间时间一致,这突出了在水生屏障背景下鸟类迁徙的复杂性。这突出了需要进一步的高时间分辨率研究,以更深入地了解响应这些障碍的迁移行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Movement Ecology
Movement Ecology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
47
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: Movement Ecology is an open-access interdisciplinary journal publishing novel insights from empirical and theoretical approaches into the ecology of movement of the whole organism - either animals, plants or microorganisms - as the central theme. We welcome manuscripts on any taxa and any movement phenomena (e.g. foraging, dispersal and seasonal migration) addressing important research questions on the patterns, mechanisms, causes and consequences of organismal movement. Manuscripts will be rigorously peer-reviewed to ensure novelty and high quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信