Verifying learning success: assessment and certification of student ultrasound education.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ricarda Neubauer, Florian Recker, Johannes Weimer, Christian Jenssen, Dieter Nürnberg, Thomas Karlas, Susan Campbell Westerway, Johannes P Ruppert, Nils Daum, Anna Gschmack, Yi Dong, Kathleen Möller, Nasenien Nourkami-Tutdibi, Gregor Barth, Roxana Şirli, Claudia Lucius, Michael Prats, Sophie-Luise Sänger, Michael Keil, Constantinos Zervides, Beatrice Hoffmann, Christoph F Dietrich
{"title":"Verifying learning success: assessment and certification of student ultrasound education.","authors":"Ricarda Neubauer, Florian Recker, Johannes Weimer, Christian Jenssen, Dieter Nürnberg, Thomas Karlas, Susan Campbell Westerway, Johannes P Ruppert, Nils Daum, Anna Gschmack, Yi Dong, Kathleen Möller, Nasenien Nourkami-Tutdibi, Gregor Barth, Roxana Şirli, Claudia Lucius, Michael Prats, Sophie-Luise Sänger, Michael Keil, Constantinos Zervides, Beatrice Hoffmann, Christoph F Dietrich","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-07469-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Student ultrasound education (SUSE) is currently composed of heterogeneous curricular training formats, and new approaches are continually being explored to enhance undergraduate ultrasound training. Based on a literature review, this report aims to analyze and compare different forms and methods of assessment of acquired skills in ultrasound training. Therefore, the advantages and disadvantages of assessment formats and certification systems used in SUSE were discussed collaboratively between medical students, postgraduate physicians, and medical didactics experts. Ultrasound competency should be tested using structured examination formats that are objective and standardized. In addition to cognitive skills, the examination format should cover translational and behavioral components. Self-assessments and evaluations provide additional valuable perspectives. Certification systems can contribute to quality assurance by externally ensuring the achievement of milestones in SUSE. They also have the potential to support the necessary standardization of undergraduate ultrasound teaching by aligning the curricular learning objectives with qualifications to be achieved.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"851"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07469-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Student ultrasound education (SUSE) is currently composed of heterogeneous curricular training formats, and new approaches are continually being explored to enhance undergraduate ultrasound training. Based on a literature review, this report aims to analyze and compare different forms and methods of assessment of acquired skills in ultrasound training. Therefore, the advantages and disadvantages of assessment formats and certification systems used in SUSE were discussed collaboratively between medical students, postgraduate physicians, and medical didactics experts. Ultrasound competency should be tested using structured examination formats that are objective and standardized. In addition to cognitive skills, the examination format should cover translational and behavioral components. Self-assessments and evaluations provide additional valuable perspectives. Certification systems can contribute to quality assurance by externally ensuring the achievement of milestones in SUSE. They also have the potential to support the necessary standardization of undergraduate ultrasound teaching by aligning the curricular learning objectives with qualifications to be achieved.

验证学习成功:学生超声教育的评估与认证。
目前,大学生超声教育的课程训练形式多种多样,不断探索加强大学生超声训练的新途径。本报告在查阅文献的基础上,分析比较超声训练中习得技能的不同评估形式和方法。因此,在SUSE中使用的评估格式和认证系统的优缺点在医学生、研究生医师和医学教学专家之间进行了协作讨论。超声能力应采用客观和标准化的结构化考试形式进行测试。除了认知技能外,考试形式还应包括翻译和行为部分。自我评估和评估提供了额外的有价值的观点。认证系统可以通过外部确保实现SUSE的里程碑来促进质量保证。通过使课程学习目标与所要达到的资格相一致,它们也有可能支持本科超声教学的必要标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信