Answering the Call: Crafting Research Methods Congruent With Rogerian Nursing Science.

IF 1.1 4区医学 Q3 NURSING

Nursing Science Quarterly Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-20 DOI:10.1177/08943184251335277

Violet M Malinski

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early on, Martha E. Rogers called for innovative new research methods unique to the unitary worldview introduced by her science of unitary human beings. This column provides a critique of two qualitative research methods crafted specifically for this science, introduced by Judith T. Carboni and Howard K. Butcher. The critique follows the framework of ontology, epistemology, and methodology according to Parse (2001).

查看原文本刊更多论文

响应号召：制定与罗杰斯护理科学一致的研究方法。

早期，玛莎·e·罗杰斯（Martha E. Rogers）呼吁采用创新的新研究方法，这种方法是由她的单一人类科学引入的单一世界观所特有的。本专栏对Judith T. Carboni和Howard K. Butcher专门为这门科学设计的两种定性研究方法进行了批判。根据Parse(2001)，批判遵循本体论、认识论和方法论的框架。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Nursing Science Quarterly Nursing-General Nursing

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

16.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Nursing Science Quarterly (NSQ) is a peer-reviewed, quarterly journal devoted to the enhancement of nursing knowledge. The journal publishes original manuscripts focusing on nursing theory development and guided practice, and quantitative and qualitative research related to existing nursing frameworks. NSQ also publishes innovative ideas related to nursing science and person centered models of care. This journal is a member of theCommittee on Publication Ethics (COPE).