Risk Factors for Readmission Following Elderly Low Energy Pelvis Fractures.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-06-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/21514593251350498
Sean Thomas, Avinaash Korrapati, Brendan O'Leary, Cooper Haaland, Alexandra K Schwartz, William T Kent
{"title":"Risk Factors for Readmission Following Elderly Low Energy Pelvis Fractures.","authors":"Sean Thomas, Avinaash Korrapati, Brendan O'Leary, Cooper Haaland, Alexandra K Schwartz, William T Kent","doi":"10.1177/21514593251350498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) are associated with loss of mobility and significant mortality in elderly patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the 60-day readmission rates following FFP and to identify what factors may predict readmission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six hundred thirty-one patients over 65 years of age presenting for FFP to a level 1 trauma center between 2010 and 2022 were reviewed. The chi-square test of independence and logistic regression were performed to identify factors associated with readmission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and thirty-six patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 31 (23%) returned to the Emergency Department (ED) within 60 days of discharge and 16 (12%) were readmitted. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (OR = 3.30, <i>P</i> = .01), discharge home instead of to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) (OR = 2.75, <i>P</i> = .01), discharge home from the ED instead of admission to the hospital (OR = 2.95, <i>P</i> = .009), and an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥4 (OR = 5.14, <i>P</i> = .03) were all associated with return to the ED. Patients who were able to ambulate in the ED were less likely to be admitted to the hospital (OR = 0.05, <i>P</i> < .001) and more likely to return to the ED within 60 days (OR = 4.52, <i>P</i> = .03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Return to the ED and readmission following FFP is common, with an incidence of 23% and 12% in our cohort. Patients who were not admitted as an inpatient after their initial presentation, and patients who were discharged home instead of to a SNF, both had a higher risk of repeat presentation within 60 days of discharge. Additionally, ambulation by patients in the ED may provide false reassurance, as these patients were less likely to be admitted as an inpatient, but more likely to subsequently return within 60 days.</p>","PeriodicalId":48568,"journal":{"name":"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation","volume":"16 ","pages":"21514593251350498"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12177243/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21514593251350498","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) are associated with loss of mobility and significant mortality in elderly patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the 60-day readmission rates following FFP and to identify what factors may predict readmission.

Methods: Six hundred thirty-one patients over 65 years of age presenting for FFP to a level 1 trauma center between 2010 and 2022 were reviewed. The chi-square test of independence and logistic regression were performed to identify factors associated with readmission.

Results: One hundred and thirty-six patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 31 (23%) returned to the Emergency Department (ED) within 60 days of discharge and 16 (12%) were readmitted. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (OR = 3.30, P = .01), discharge home instead of to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) (OR = 2.75, P = .01), discharge home from the ED instead of admission to the hospital (OR = 2.95, P = .009), and an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥4 (OR = 5.14, P = .03) were all associated with return to the ED. Patients who were able to ambulate in the ED were less likely to be admitted to the hospital (OR = 0.05, P < .001) and more likely to return to the ED within 60 days (OR = 4.52, P = .03).

Conclusion: Return to the ED and readmission following FFP is common, with an incidence of 23% and 12% in our cohort. Patients who were not admitted as an inpatient after their initial presentation, and patients who were discharged home instead of to a SNF, both had a higher risk of repeat presentation within 60 days of discharge. Additionally, ambulation by patients in the ED may provide false reassurance, as these patients were less likely to be admitted as an inpatient, but more likely to subsequently return within 60 days.

老年低能量骨盆骨折再入院的危险因素。
老年患者骨盆脆性骨折(FFP)与活动能力丧失和显著死亡率相关。本研究的目的是评估FFP后60天的再入院率,并确定哪些因素可能预测再入院。方法:回顾2010年至2022年间,631例65岁以上的FFP患者在一级创伤中心就诊。采用卡方独立性检验和logistic回归分析确定与再入院相关的因素。结果:136例患者符合纳入标准。其中31例(23%)在出院后60天内返回急诊科,16例(12%)再次入院。慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)(或= 3.30,P = . 01),出院回家,而不是一个熟练的护理机构(SNF)(或= 2.75,P = . 01),放电从ED回家住进医院而不是(或= 2.95,P = .009),和一个美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分≥4(或= 5.14,P = .03点)都与回归。在ED患者能够走动是不太可能去住院(或= 0.05,P < 0.001),且60天内复诊的可能性更高(OR = 4.52, P = 0.03)。结论:FFP后返回急诊科和再入院是常见的,在我们的队列中发病率为23%和12%。初次发病后未作为住院患者入院的患者,以及出院回家而不是到SNF的患者,在出院后60天内重复发病的风险都较高。此外,患者在急诊科走动可能会提供虚假的保证,因为这些患者不太可能作为住院患者入院,但更有可能在60天内再次入院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation (GOS) is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that provides clinical information concerning musculoskeletal conditions affecting the aging population. GOS focuses on care of geriatric orthopaedic patients and their subsequent rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信