Trends and disparities in place of death among patients with cholangiocarcinoma: A two-decade analysis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Imran Qureshi, Charmi Patel, Steven Rella, Evan Botterman, Yazan Abboud, Ritik Goyal, Kaveh Hajifathalian, Paul Gaglio, Ahmed Al-Khazraji
{"title":"Trends and disparities in place of death among patients with cholangiocarcinoma: A two-decade analysis.","authors":"Imran Qureshi, Charmi Patel, Steven Rella, Evan Botterman, Yazan Abboud, Ritik Goyal, Kaveh Hajifathalian, Paul Gaglio, Ahmed Al-Khazraji","doi":"10.1017/S147895152510031X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second most lethal primary hepatic malignancy. It has been well-reported that most cancer patients prefer to die at home or in a hospice facility. However, there is limited data on the place of death for CCA patients. We evaluated trends and disparities in place of death for patients with CCA from 1999 to 2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the CDC WONDER database (1999-2020), we calculated the frequency of CCA deaths at home/hospice and the average annual percentage change (AAPC) over this period stratified by race, age, gender, and region. We employed logistic regression to assess for associations between these variables and place of death for patients whose death was attributed to CCA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 140,422 deaths, a rise in deaths occurred in home/hospice facilities compared to inpatient medical or nursing facilities across all variables examined. Blacks and individuals ≥ 85 had the highest proportion of deaths outside of home/hospice. However, Blacks showed the highest AAPC (8.56%) in home/hospice deaths, followed by Asians (AAPC 8.44%). In contrast, individuals aged 45-54 saw the lowest AAPC (4.27%). Non-whites were less likely to die at home/hospice, with Blacks demonstrating the lowest adjusted odds ratio (aOR 0.64). Those ≥ 85 were less likely to die in home/hospice (aOR 0.78), whereas individuals aged between 55-64 (aOR 1.11) and 65-74 (aOR 1.12) had increased odds of dying in these settings. Patients from the Western region were the most likely to die at home/hospice (aOR 1.04).</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>Our study highlights disparities in place of death of patients with CCA amongst races, regions, and ages. Non-whites, extremes of ages, and patients from the Northeast have disproportionately poor outcomes in terms of end-of-life care in the US. These findings emphasize the need for efforts to address sociodemographic disparities in end-of-life care to improve patient-centered health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47898,"journal":{"name":"Palliative & Supportive Care","volume":"23 ","pages":"e122"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative & Supportive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S147895152510031X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second most lethal primary hepatic malignancy. It has been well-reported that most cancer patients prefer to die at home or in a hospice facility. However, there is limited data on the place of death for CCA patients. We evaluated trends and disparities in place of death for patients with CCA from 1999 to 2020.

Methods: Using the CDC WONDER database (1999-2020), we calculated the frequency of CCA deaths at home/hospice and the average annual percentage change (AAPC) over this period stratified by race, age, gender, and region. We employed logistic regression to assess for associations between these variables and place of death for patients whose death was attributed to CCA.

Results: Among 140,422 deaths, a rise in deaths occurred in home/hospice facilities compared to inpatient medical or nursing facilities across all variables examined. Blacks and individuals ≥ 85 had the highest proportion of deaths outside of home/hospice. However, Blacks showed the highest AAPC (8.56%) in home/hospice deaths, followed by Asians (AAPC 8.44%). In contrast, individuals aged 45-54 saw the lowest AAPC (4.27%). Non-whites were less likely to die at home/hospice, with Blacks demonstrating the lowest adjusted odds ratio (aOR 0.64). Those ≥ 85 were less likely to die in home/hospice (aOR 0.78), whereas individuals aged between 55-64 (aOR 1.11) and 65-74 (aOR 1.12) had increased odds of dying in these settings. Patients from the Western region were the most likely to die at home/hospice (aOR 1.04).

Significance of results: Our study highlights disparities in place of death of patients with CCA amongst races, regions, and ages. Non-whites, extremes of ages, and patients from the Northeast have disproportionately poor outcomes in terms of end-of-life care in the US. These findings emphasize the need for efforts to address sociodemographic disparities in end-of-life care to improve patient-centered health outcomes.

胆管癌患者死亡地点的趋势和差异:二十年分析
目的:胆管癌(CCA)是第二大致死性原发性肝脏恶性肿瘤。据报道,大多数癌症患者宁愿在家中或临终关怀机构中死去。然而,关于CCA患者死亡地点的数据有限。我们评估了1999年至2020年CCA患者死亡地点的趋势和差异。方法:使用CDC WONDER数据库(1999-2020),我们按种族、年龄、性别和地区分层计算了CCA在家中/临终关怀中死亡的频率和这一时期的平均年百分比变化(AAPC)。我们采用逻辑回归来评估这些变量与因CCA死亡的患者死亡地点之间的关联。结果:在140422例死亡中,与住院医疗或护理机构相比,家庭/临终关怀机构的死亡人数在所有变量中都有所增加。黑人和≥85岁的个体在家庭/临终关怀之外死亡的比例最高。然而,在家庭/临终关怀死亡中,黑人的AAPC最高(8.56%),其次是亚洲人(8.44%)。相比之下,45-54岁个体的AAPC最低(4.27%)。非白人在家中或临终关怀中死亡的可能性较小,黑人的调整优势比最低(aOR 0.64)。那些≥85岁的人在家庭/临终关怀中死亡的可能性较小(aOR 0.78),而年龄在55-64岁(aOR 1.11)和65-74岁(aOR 1.12)之间的人在这些环境中死亡的几率增加。来自西部地区的患者最有可能在家中/临终关怀中死亡(aOR 1.04)。结果的意义:我们的研究强调了不同种族、地区和年龄的CCA患者死亡地点的差异。在美国,非白人、极端年龄和来自东北部的患者在临终关怀方面的结果不成比例地差。这些发现强调需要努力解决临终关怀中的社会人口差异,以改善以患者为中心的健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative & Supportive Care
Palliative & Supportive Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
280
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信