Scaling up PROSCeSS intervention in France: a systems approach to health-promoting sports clubs.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Benjamin Tézier, Quentin Michaud, Florence Rostan, Fabienne Lemonnier, Anne Vuillemin, Francis Guillemin, Kévin Barros, Aurélie Van Hoye
{"title":"Scaling up PROSCeSS intervention in France: a systems approach to health-promoting sports clubs.","authors":"Benjamin Tézier, Quentin Michaud, Florence Rostan, Fabienne Lemonnier, Anne Vuillemin, Francis Guillemin, Kévin Barros, Aurélie Van Hoye","doi":"10.1177/17579759251332971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sports clubs have been encouraged by political and health authorities to exploit their health promotion potential. Yet, existing literature highlights a lack of systems thinking and coordination, limiting sports clubs' capacity to implement sustainable health promotion interventions. The aim of this article is to describe the scaling-up process and the initial systems map of a health promotion intervention in sports clubs - the PROSCeSS intervention - and to discuss the use of the ExpandNet/WHO guide in this context.A participatory research approach using the nine-step guide from the ExpandNet/WHO was used. Five 2-hour meetings, completed with feedback and questionnaires between meetings, involving 36 stakeholders (14 from public health, 7 from sports, 7 academics and 8 political actors, from local to national levels), were recorded. The data (notes, meeting minutes, questionnaires) were analysed using a deductive process based on the nine-step ExpandNet/WHO guide. Results enabled researchers to identify targets of the intervention, as well as challenges and facilitators for implementing health promotion interventions in sports clubs. Fifty political, sports, academic and public health organisations at local and regional levels were identified as being able to support the scaling-up of the intervention, endorsing different roles : 1) methodological support, 2) communication, 3) provision of resources, 4) advocacy and 5) research. Twenty-two actions were identified and prioritised to support organisations in fulfilling the role they can play in the institutionalisation and expansion of health promotion in sports clubs. This work contributes to strengthening the multi-level systems thinking needed for health promotion implementation in sports clubs, enhancing their societal role to support individuals' health.</p>","PeriodicalId":46805,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"17579759251332971"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17579759251332971","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sports clubs have been encouraged by political and health authorities to exploit their health promotion potential. Yet, existing literature highlights a lack of systems thinking and coordination, limiting sports clubs' capacity to implement sustainable health promotion interventions. The aim of this article is to describe the scaling-up process and the initial systems map of a health promotion intervention in sports clubs - the PROSCeSS intervention - and to discuss the use of the ExpandNet/WHO guide in this context.A participatory research approach using the nine-step guide from the ExpandNet/WHO was used. Five 2-hour meetings, completed with feedback and questionnaires between meetings, involving 36 stakeholders (14 from public health, 7 from sports, 7 academics and 8 political actors, from local to national levels), were recorded. The data (notes, meeting minutes, questionnaires) were analysed using a deductive process based on the nine-step ExpandNet/WHO guide. Results enabled researchers to identify targets of the intervention, as well as challenges and facilitators for implementing health promotion interventions in sports clubs. Fifty political, sports, academic and public health organisations at local and regional levels were identified as being able to support the scaling-up of the intervention, endorsing different roles : 1) methodological support, 2) communication, 3) provision of resources, 4) advocacy and 5) research. Twenty-two actions were identified and prioritised to support organisations in fulfilling the role they can play in the institutionalisation and expansion of health promotion in sports clubs. This work contributes to strengthening the multi-level systems thinking needed for health promotion implementation in sports clubs, enhancing their societal role to support individuals' health.

在法国扩大process干预:促进健康的体育俱乐部的系统方法。
政治和卫生当局鼓励体育俱乐部发挥其促进健康的潜力。然而,现有文献强调缺乏系统思维和协调,限制了体育俱乐部实施可持续健康促进干预措施的能力。本文的目的是描述体育俱乐部健康促进干预(process干预)的扩大过程和初始系统图,并讨论在此背景下使用ExpandNet/WHO指南。采用了参与性研究方法,使用了来自扩展网/世卫组织的九步指南。记录了5次2小时的会议,会议之间有反馈意见和问卷,涉及36个利益攸关方(从地方到国家各级,公共卫生部门14个,体育界7个,学术界7个,政治行为者8个)。使用基于ExpandNet/WHO指南的九步演绎过程对数据(笔记、会议记录、问卷)进行了分析。研究结果使研究人员能够确定干预的目标,以及在体育俱乐部实施健康促进干预的挑战和促进因素。确定了地方和区域各级的50个政治、体育、学术和公共卫生组织能够支持扩大干预措施,并认可了不同的作用:1)方法支持,2)沟通,3)提供资源,4)宣传和5)研究。确定并优先考虑了22项行动,以支持各组织在体育俱乐部的健康促进制度化和扩大方面发挥作用。本研究有助于加强体育俱乐部实施健康促进所需的多层次系统思维,增强其支持个人健康的社会作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Health Promotion
Global Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The journal aims to: ·publish academic content and commentaries of practical importance; ·provide an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination and exchange of health promotion, health education and public health theory, research findings, practice and reviews; ·publish articles which ensure wide geographical coverage and are of general interest to an international readership; ·provide fair, supportive, efficient and high quality peer review and editorial handling of all submissions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信