Flow diverter with or without adjunctive coils in the treatment of large and giant intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Matias E Sein, Alejandro Ceciliano, Fernando Navarro, Silvina Molina, Francisco Villasante, Eduardo E Tejado, Manuel Requena, David Hernandez, Marta de Dios Lascuevas, Alejandro Tomasello, Francesco Diana
{"title":"Flow diverter with or without adjunctive coils in the treatment of large and giant intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Matias E Sein, Alejandro Ceciliano, Fernando Navarro, Silvina Molina, Francisco Villasante, Eduardo E Tejado, Manuel Requena, David Hernandez, Marta de Dios Lascuevas, Alejandro Tomasello, Francesco Diana","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03675-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate the available evidence on the efficacy and safety of flow diverters (FD) with or without adjunctive coils (C) for the treatment of large and giant aneurysms. A systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant studies in PubMed and selected articles up to December 2022 were conducted. The primary objective was to evaluate the rate of favorable occlusion O'Kelly Marotta (OKM) C-D at the last follow-up, while the secondary objective was to assess complication rates. A fixed-effects model was used, and relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. A total of 146 articles were identified, but only 10 were included in the meta-analysis. This included 541 controlled aneurysms out of a total of 680 large and giant aneurysms from 1,667 patients. We found no statistical differences in favorable OKM C-D outcomes with or without the adjunctive use of coils (RR 1.06 [0.96, 1.17]; p = 0.280). However, FD + C presented fewer complications (RR 0.56 [0.33, 0.95]; I²=0%; p = 0.03). No statistical differences were found for mortality (RR 0.86 [0.34, 2.18]; I²=0%; p = 0.75). The use of adjunctive coils during treatment of large and giant aneurysms with FD seems to reduce the risk of procedural and delayed complications, while it does not increase the aneurysm occlusion rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"519"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03675-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To evaluate the available evidence on the efficacy and safety of flow diverters (FD) with or without adjunctive coils (C) for the treatment of large and giant aneurysms. A systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant studies in PubMed and selected articles up to December 2022 were conducted. The primary objective was to evaluate the rate of favorable occlusion O'Kelly Marotta (OKM) C-D at the last follow-up, while the secondary objective was to assess complication rates. A fixed-effects model was used, and relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. A total of 146 articles were identified, but only 10 were included in the meta-analysis. This included 541 controlled aneurysms out of a total of 680 large and giant aneurysms from 1,667 patients. We found no statistical differences in favorable OKM C-D outcomes with or without the adjunctive use of coils (RR 1.06 [0.96, 1.17]; p = 0.280). However, FD + C presented fewer complications (RR 0.56 [0.33, 0.95]; I²=0%; p = 0.03). No statistical differences were found for mortality (RR 0.86 [0.34, 2.18]; I²=0%; p = 0.75). The use of adjunctive coils during treatment of large and giant aneurysms with FD seems to reduce the risk of procedural and delayed complications, while it does not increase the aneurysm occlusion rate.

带或不带辅助线圈的分流器治疗颅内大动脉瘤:荟萃分析。
评价有辅助线圈或无辅助线圈的分流器(FD)治疗大动脉瘤和巨动脉瘤的有效性和安全性。对截至2022年12月PubMed上的相关研究和部分文章进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。主要目的是在最后一次随访时评估O'Kelly Marotta (OKM) C-D的有利闭塞率,而次要目的是评估并发症发生率。采用固定效应模型,计算相对危险度(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)。共有146篇文章被确定,但只有10篇被纳入meta分析。这包括来自1,667名患者的680个大动脉瘤和巨动脉瘤中的541个控制动脉瘤。我们发现有或没有辅助使用线圈的OKM C-D预后无统计学差异(RR 1.06 [0.96, 1.17];p = 0.280)。FD + C组并发症较少(RR 0.56 [0.33, 0.95];²= 0%;p = 0.03)。两组死亡率无统计学差异(RR 0.86 [0.34, 2.18];²= 0%;p = 0.75)。在FD治疗大、巨动脉瘤时使用辅助线圈似乎可以降低程序性和延迟性并发症的风险,但不会增加动脉瘤闭塞率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信