CLOSE-UP - a favourable protocol for limb-sparing surgery of diabetic foot osteomyelitis.

IF 2.8 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Journal of Bone and Joint Infection Pub Date : 2025-06-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5194/jbji-10-199-2025
Anton Alexander Nolte Peterlin, Louise Kruse Jensen, Emil Gleipner-Andersen, Hans Gottlieb
{"title":"CLOSE-UP - a favourable protocol for limb-sparing surgery of diabetic foot osteomyelitis.","authors":"Anton Alexander Nolte Peterlin, Louise Kruse Jensen, Emil Gleipner-Andersen, Hans Gottlieb","doi":"10.5194/jbji-10-199-2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>: Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) is a severe complication of diabetic foot ulcers, leading to high morbidity, mortality, and major limb amputation risk. While limb-sparing surgery is well established, optimal wound closure and intraosseous antibiotic strategies remain under-explored and under-reported. This study evaluates a single-stage limb-sparing surgical approach incorporating primary closure and local intraosseous antibiotic therapy. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective study included 97 DFO patients (2017-2024) treated using the CLOSE-UP (Conservative surgery, Local antibiotics, Oral versus intravenous antibiotics - OVIVA, Samples, Effective limb preservation, and closUre Primary) protocol, developed to standardize DFO surgery. The one-stage procedure involved bone sampling, local debridement or minor amputation (distal to the tarsometatarsal joint), antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate-hydroxyapatite biocomposite application, and primary wound closure. Postoperatively, patients followed the OVIVA antimicrobial protocol: 1 week of intravenous (IV) therapy and 5 weeks of oral (empiric penicillin-cloxacillin) therapy. The primary outcome was treatment failure within 1 year, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. <b>Results</b>: Clinical failure occurred in 13 patients (13.4 %), with only 4 patients (4.1 %) requiring major amputation. Peripheral arterial disease was present in 24 patients (24.7 %) and was the only variable significantly associated with clinical failure (odds ratios: 10.21; <math><mrow><mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.01</mn></mrow> </math> ). The 1-year and 3-year mortality rates were 14.4 % and 35.9 %, respectively. <b>Conclusions</b>: The CLOSE-UP protocol demonstrated favourable outcomes. Given the high risk of mortality and limb loss in DFO, this structured approach has the potential to improve mobility, shorten rehabilitation, lower costs, and enhance quality of life. Further research, particularly randomized controlled trials, should focus on optimizing wound closure to improve long-term limb preservation and survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":15271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","volume":"10 3","pages":"199-206"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12177510/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-10-199-2025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) is a severe complication of diabetic foot ulcers, leading to high morbidity, mortality, and major limb amputation risk. While limb-sparing surgery is well established, optimal wound closure and intraosseous antibiotic strategies remain under-explored and under-reported. This study evaluates a single-stage limb-sparing surgical approach incorporating primary closure and local intraosseous antibiotic therapy. Methods: This retrospective study included 97 DFO patients (2017-2024) treated using the CLOSE-UP (Conservative surgery, Local antibiotics, Oral versus intravenous antibiotics - OVIVA, Samples, Effective limb preservation, and closUre Primary) protocol, developed to standardize DFO surgery. The one-stage procedure involved bone sampling, local debridement or minor amputation (distal to the tarsometatarsal joint), antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate-hydroxyapatite biocomposite application, and primary wound closure. Postoperatively, patients followed the OVIVA antimicrobial protocol: 1 week of intravenous (IV) therapy and 5 weeks of oral (empiric penicillin-cloxacillin) therapy. The primary outcome was treatment failure within 1 year, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Results: Clinical failure occurred in 13 patients (13.4 %), with only 4 patients (4.1 %) requiring major amputation. Peripheral arterial disease was present in 24 patients (24.7 %) and was the only variable significantly associated with clinical failure (odds ratios: 10.21; P < 0.01 ). The 1-year and 3-year mortality rates were 14.4 % and 35.9 %, respectively. Conclusions: The CLOSE-UP protocol demonstrated favourable outcomes. Given the high risk of mortality and limb loss in DFO, this structured approach has the potential to improve mobility, shorten rehabilitation, lower costs, and enhance quality of life. Further research, particularly randomized controlled trials, should focus on optimizing wound closure to improve long-term limb preservation and survival.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

特写-糖尿病足骨髓炎保肢手术的有利方案。
导言:糖尿病足骨髓炎(DFO)是糖尿病足溃疡的严重并发症,发病率、死亡率高,截肢风险大。虽然肢体保留手术已经建立,但最佳伤口闭合和骨内抗生素策略仍未得到充分探索和报道。本研究评估了一种单期保肢手术方法,包括初级闭合和局部骨内抗生素治疗。方法:本回顾性研究纳入97例DFO患者(2017-2024年),采用近距离(保守手术、局部抗生素、口服与静脉注射抗生素- OVIVA、样品、有效肢体保存和初步闭合)治疗方案,以规范DFO手术。一期手术包括骨取样、局部清创或小截肢(跗跖关节远端)、抗生素负载硫酸钙-羟基磷灰石生物复合材料应用和初级伤口愈合。术后,患者遵循OVIVA抗菌方案:1周静脉(IV)治疗和5周口服(经验性青霉素-氯西林)治疗。主要结局是1年内治疗失败,至少随访12个月。结果:临床失败13例(13.4%),需大截肢4例(4.1%)。24例患者(24.7%)存在外周动脉疾病,是唯一与临床失败显著相关的变量(优势比:10.21;P < 0.01)。1年和3年死亡率分别为14.4%和35.9%。结论:近距离治疗方案显示出良好的效果。考虑到DFO的高死亡率和肢体丧失风险,这种结构化方法有可能改善活动能力,缩短康复时间,降低成本并提高生活质量。进一步的研究,特别是随机对照试验,应侧重于优化伤口闭合,以改善长期肢体保存和生存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信