Selecting performance indicators for farms and ranches engaged in collaborative agroecosystem research.

IF 2.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Megan Donovan, Sheri Spiegal, Nicole Kaplan, David Archer, Alycia Bean, Sarah E J Beebout, Brandon T Bestelmeyer, Patrick Clark, Alia DeLong, Ann-Marie Fortuna, Claire N Friedrichsen, David L Hoover, David Huggins, Peter J A Kleinman, Matthew M McIntosh, Chris S Renschler, John Ritten, Douglas R Smith, Nicholas P Webb, J D Wulfhorst
{"title":"Selecting performance indicators for farms and ranches engaged in collaborative agroecosystem research.","authors":"Megan Donovan, Sheri Spiegal, Nicole Kaplan, David Archer, Alycia Bean, Sarah E J Beebout, Brandon T Bestelmeyer, Patrick Clark, Alia DeLong, Ann-Marie Fortuna, Claire N Friedrichsen, David L Hoover, David Huggins, Peter J A Kleinman, Matthew M McIntosh, Chris S Renschler, John Ritten, Douglas R Smith, Nicholas P Webb, J D Wulfhorst","doi":"10.1002/jeq2.70051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The pace of global change complicates the assessment of the outcomes of agricultural management, hindering decision-making by producers, researchers, and consumers. The Long-Term Agroecosystem Research Network (LTAR) is in a unique position to advance monitoring to inform decision-making. Here, we describe how the network selected performance indicators designed to measure the trade-offs from various farming and ranching approaches. Indicator selection was motivated by the need for common indicators that apply to the diversity of LTAR sites, but they are intended for widespread use by producers and other managers via the Agricultural Performance Indicator and Context Knowledge System (AgPICKS). An initial set of domains, attributes, and indicators was developed via synthesis of structured conversations at national LTAR meetings. Early use revealed the need for a systematically inclusive process toward improvement. We designed and implemented an iterative decision-making protocol to reach a consensus for a new version. The indicator framework differs from others in its attention to production and social outcomes and its grounding in networked agricultural science. Next steps entail developing web tools and personnel for AgPICKS that use LTAR's data and knowledge ecosystem to guide users in setting benchmarks of the desired conditions for their prioritized indicators, collect data, and visualize data to assess how well their management meets their benchmarks, toward the accurate measurement of management outcomes in a changing world.</p>","PeriodicalId":15732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental quality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental quality","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.70051","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The pace of global change complicates the assessment of the outcomes of agricultural management, hindering decision-making by producers, researchers, and consumers. The Long-Term Agroecosystem Research Network (LTAR) is in a unique position to advance monitoring to inform decision-making. Here, we describe how the network selected performance indicators designed to measure the trade-offs from various farming and ranching approaches. Indicator selection was motivated by the need for common indicators that apply to the diversity of LTAR sites, but they are intended for widespread use by producers and other managers via the Agricultural Performance Indicator and Context Knowledge System (AgPICKS). An initial set of domains, attributes, and indicators was developed via synthesis of structured conversations at national LTAR meetings. Early use revealed the need for a systematically inclusive process toward improvement. We designed and implemented an iterative decision-making protocol to reach a consensus for a new version. The indicator framework differs from others in its attention to production and social outcomes and its grounding in networked agricultural science. Next steps entail developing web tools and personnel for AgPICKS that use LTAR's data and knowledge ecosystem to guide users in setting benchmarks of the desired conditions for their prioritized indicators, collect data, and visualize data to assess how well their management meets their benchmarks, toward the accurate measurement of management outcomes in a changing world.

为从事农业生态系统合作研究的农场和牧场选择绩效指标。
全球变化的速度使农业管理结果的评估变得复杂,阻碍了生产者、研究人员和消费者的决策。长期农业生态系统研究网络(LTAR)在推进监测、为决策提供信息方面具有独特的地位。在这里,我们描述了网络如何选择性能指标来衡量各种农业和牧场方法的权衡。指标选择的动机是需要适用于LTAR站点多样性的共同指标,但这些指标旨在通过农业绩效指标和背景知识系统(AgPICKS)供生产者和其他管理人员广泛使用。通过综合国家LTAR会议上的结构化对话,制定了一套初步的领域、属性和指标。早期的使用表明需要一个系统的、包括改进的过程。我们设计并实现了一个迭代决策协议,以达成新版本的共识。该指标框架与其他指标框架的不同之处在于它关注生产和社会成果,并以网络化农业科学为基础。下一步需要为AgPICKS开发网络工具和人员,使用LTAR的数据和知识生态系统来指导用户为其优先指标设定所需条件的基准,收集数据,并将数据可视化,以评估其管理是否满足基准,以便在不断变化的世界中准确衡量管理结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of environmental quality
Journal of environmental quality 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
123
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Articles in JEQ cover various aspects of anthropogenic impacts on the environment, including agricultural, terrestrial, atmospheric, and aquatic systems, with emphasis on the understanding of underlying processes. To be acceptable for consideration in JEQ, a manuscript must make a significant contribution to the advancement of knowledge or toward a better understanding of existing concepts. The study should define principles of broad applicability, be related to problems over a sizable geographic area, or be of potential interest to a representative number of scientists. Emphasis is given to the understanding of underlying processes rather than to monitoring. Contributions are accepted from all disciplines for consideration by the editorial board. Manuscripts may be volunteered, invited, or coordinated as a special section or symposium.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信