Efficacy of Antipsychotic Treatment for Delusional Infestation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 3.9 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Erman Şentürk, Burak Erman Menkü, Peter Lepping, Behcet Coşar
{"title":"Efficacy of Antipsychotic Treatment for Delusional Infestation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Erman Şentürk, Burak Erman Menkü, Peter Lepping, Behcet Coşar","doi":"10.1177/12034754251345785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delusional infestation (DI) is a rare psychiatric disorder characterized by false beliefs in infestation, often presenting to dermatology clinics with unexplained skin complaints. Antipsychotic treatments are commonly used; however, their comparative efficacy in DI remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of six antipsychotics-pimozide, olanzapine, aripiprazole, risperidone, amisulpride, and paliperidone-in the treatment of DI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted at a university hospital in Turkey, analyzing anonymized medical records from 36 patients diagnosed with DI and treated with one of six antipsychotics between 2014 and 2023. Equivalent doses of antipsychotics were standardized to 100 mg of chlorpromazine. Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) scores were used to assess treatment response at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Repeated measures ANOVA was employed to compare the efficacy of each antipsychotic over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All six antipsychotics significantly reduced CGI-S scores over the 6-month period (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Amisulpride, followed by paliperdione and risperidone, demonstrated the most substantial improvements, with mean CGI-S scores decreasing from 5.43 to 1.71, 5.20 to 2.00, and 5.17 to 2.00, respectively, by 6 months. Pimozide showed reasonable efficacy. Aripiprazole and olanzapine had the least efficacy after 6 months. There was a significant reduction over time in aripiprazole showing the strongest initial response.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Amisulpride, followed by paliperidone and risperidone, emerged as the most effective treatments for DI, with the greatest reductions in symptom severity, confirming previous studies. The effect is significant over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":15403,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"12034754251345785"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/12034754251345785","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Delusional infestation (DI) is a rare psychiatric disorder characterized by false beliefs in infestation, often presenting to dermatology clinics with unexplained skin complaints. Antipsychotic treatments are commonly used; however, their comparative efficacy in DI remains unclear.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of six antipsychotics-pimozide, olanzapine, aripiprazole, risperidone, amisulpride, and paliperidone-in the treatment of DI.

Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted at a university hospital in Turkey, analyzing anonymized medical records from 36 patients diagnosed with DI and treated with one of six antipsychotics between 2014 and 2023. Equivalent doses of antipsychotics were standardized to 100 mg of chlorpromazine. Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) scores were used to assess treatment response at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Repeated measures ANOVA was employed to compare the efficacy of each antipsychotic over time.

Results: All six antipsychotics significantly reduced CGI-S scores over the 6-month period (P < 0.001). Amisulpride, followed by paliperdione and risperidone, demonstrated the most substantial improvements, with mean CGI-S scores decreasing from 5.43 to 1.71, 5.20 to 2.00, and 5.17 to 2.00, respectively, by 6 months. Pimozide showed reasonable efficacy. Aripiprazole and olanzapine had the least efficacy after 6 months. There was a significant reduction over time in aripiprazole showing the strongest initial response.

Conclusions: Amisulpride, followed by paliperidone and risperidone, emerged as the most effective treatments for DI, with the greatest reductions in symptom severity, confirming previous studies. The effect is significant over time.

抗精神病药物治疗妄想感染的疗效:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:妄想性感染(DI)是一种罕见的精神疾病,其特征是对感染有错误的信念,经常以无法解释的皮肤症状出现在皮肤科诊所。抗精神病药物是常用的;然而,它们在DI中的相对疗效尚不清楚。目的:本研究旨在评价吡莫齐、奥氮平、阿立哌唑、利培酮、阿米硫pride和帕利哌酮6种抗精神病药物治疗DI的比较疗效。方法:在土耳其的一所大学医院进行了一项回顾性观察队列研究,分析了2014年至2023年间36名诊断为DI并接受六种抗精神病药物之一治疗的患者的匿名医疗记录。等效剂量的抗精神病药物标准化为100毫克氯丙嗪。临床总体印象严重程度(CGI-S)评分用于评估基线、3个月和6个月的治疗反应。采用重复测量方差分析比较各抗精神病药的疗效。结果:6个月期间,所有6种抗精神病药物均显著降低CGI-S评分(P < 0.001)。阿米sulpride,其次是帕利潘酮和利培酮,表现出最显著的改善,平均gi - s评分分别从5.43降至1.71,从5.20降至2.00,从5.17降至2.00,6个月。吡莫齐特疗效合理。阿立哌唑和奥氮平6个月后疗效最低。随着时间的推移,阿立哌唑显著降低,表现出最强的初始反应。结论:阿米硫pride,其次是帕利培酮和利培酮,是治疗DI最有效的治疗方法,症状严重程度降低最大,证实了先前的研究。随着时间的推移,这种影响是显著的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery (JCMS) aims to reflect the state of the art in cutaneous biology and dermatology by providing original scientific writings, as well as a complete critical review of the dermatology literature for clinicians, trainees, and academicians. JCMS endeavours to bring readers cutting edge dermatologic information in two distinct formats. Part of each issue features scholarly research and articles on issues of basic and applied science, insightful case reports, comprehensive continuing medical education, and in depth reviews, all of which provide theoretical framework for practitioners to make sound practical decisions. The evolving field of dermatology is highlighted through these articles. In addition, part of each issue is dedicated to making the most important developments in dermatology easily accessible to the clinician by presenting well-chosen, well-written, and highly organized information in a format that is interesting, clearly presented, and useful to patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信