Free-Weight and Smith-Machine Squats: Do They Produce Selective Chronic Adaptations in the Effectiveness of Force Application?

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY
Daniel Marcos-Frutos, Sergio Miras-Moreno, Gonzalo Márquez, Amador García-Ramos
{"title":"Free-Weight and Smith-Machine Squats: Do They Produce Selective Chronic Adaptations in the Effectiveness of Force Application?","authors":"Daniel Marcos-Frutos, Sergio Miras-Moreno, Gonzalo Márquez, Amador García-Ramos","doi":"10.1123/ijspp.2025-0104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Force is applied more in the backward direction during Smith-machine (SM) squats than in free-weight (FW) squats, although it is still uncertain whether this discrepancy will result in chronic adaptations in that direction.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to assess the effects of an 8-week squat training with FW or SM on longitudinal ground-reaction forces recorded during both FW and SM squats.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty sport-science students (9 female) were assigned to either an FW or SM training group, balanced by sex and relative strength. The 8-week training (2 sessions/wk) consisted of 4 sets of back squats at 70% of 1-repetition maximum (1-RM) with 20% velocity loss. Pretesting and posttesting assessed ground-reaction forces during a single set of 10 repetitions at ~45% and ~70% 1-RM, performed with FW in one session and SM in another session.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Squat type (FW or SM) had minimal influence on longitudinal impulse, its components (mean force and time), or the angle of the resultant ground-reaction force. The only significant difference was observed in longitudinal impulse during the propulsive phase at ~70% 1-RM in the SM squat (P = .037), where the FW training group exhibited a reduction in longitudinal impulse posttraining, while the SM training group showed an increase.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An 8-week squat training does not modify the effectiveness of force application, regardless of training or testing squat type. Therefore, both squat variations can be used interchangeably without systematically influencing the direction of force production, allowing athletes to select based on preference, equipment availability, or sport-specific demands.</p>","PeriodicalId":14295,"journal":{"name":"International journal of sports physiology and performance","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of sports physiology and performance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2025-0104","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Force is applied more in the backward direction during Smith-machine (SM) squats than in free-weight (FW) squats, although it is still uncertain whether this discrepancy will result in chronic adaptations in that direction.

Purpose: We aimed to assess the effects of an 8-week squat training with FW or SM on longitudinal ground-reaction forces recorded during both FW and SM squats.

Methods: Twenty sport-science students (9 female) were assigned to either an FW or SM training group, balanced by sex and relative strength. The 8-week training (2 sessions/wk) consisted of 4 sets of back squats at 70% of 1-repetition maximum (1-RM) with 20% velocity loss. Pretesting and posttesting assessed ground-reaction forces during a single set of 10 repetitions at ~45% and ~70% 1-RM, performed with FW in one session and SM in another session.

Results: Squat type (FW or SM) had minimal influence on longitudinal impulse, its components (mean force and time), or the angle of the resultant ground-reaction force. The only significant difference was observed in longitudinal impulse during the propulsive phase at ~70% 1-RM in the SM squat (P = .037), where the FW training group exhibited a reduction in longitudinal impulse posttraining, while the SM training group showed an increase.

Conclusions: An 8-week squat training does not modify the effectiveness of force application, regardless of training or testing squat type. Therefore, both squat variations can be used interchangeably without systematically influencing the direction of force production, allowing athletes to select based on preference, equipment availability, or sport-specific demands.

自由重量和史密斯机深蹲:它们在力量应用的有效性中产生选择性的慢性适应吗?
背景:在Smith-machine (SM)深蹲中,力更多地施加在向后的方向上,而在自由重量(FW)深蹲中,尽管目前还不确定这种差异是否会导致在那个方向上的慢性适应。目的:我们旨在评估用FW或SM进行8周深蹲训练对FW和SM深蹲期间记录的纵向地面反作用力的影响。方法:20名体育科学专业学生(9名女生)按性别和相对力量平衡分配到FW或SM训练组。为期8周的训练(2次/周)包括4组背部深蹲,每次最多重复70% (1-RM),速度损失20%。前测和后测评估了在1-RM为45%和70%的情况下,每组重复10次的地面反作用力,其中一组使用FW,另一组使用SM。结果:深蹲式(FW或SM)对纵向冲力及其分量(平均力和时间)或合成地反力角度的影响最小。唯一的显著差异是SM深蹲在~70% 1-RM时推进阶段的纵向冲量(P = 0.037), FW训练组在训练后的纵向冲量减少,而SM训练组在训练后的纵向冲量增加。结论:8周深蹲训练不会改变力量应用的有效性,无论是训练还是测试深蹲类型。因此,这两种深蹲动作可以互换使用,而不会系统地影响力量产生的方向,允许运动员根据偏好、设备可用性或运动特定要求进行选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
199
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (IJSPP) focuses on sport physiology and performance and is dedicated to advancing the knowledge of sport and exercise physiologists, sport-performance researchers, and other sport scientists. The journal publishes authoritative peer-reviewed research in sport physiology and related disciplines, with an emphasis on work having direct practical applications in enhancing sport performance in sport physiology and related disciplines. IJSPP publishes 10 issues per year: January, February, March, April, May, July, August, September, October, and November.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信