Assessing Maximum Sprinting Speed in Female Team Sport: The Role of Sprint Distance and Timing-Gate Configuration.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY
Eddie McGuinness, Kris Beattie, Mark Lyons, Aoife Lane, Clement Higginbotham, Robin Healy
{"title":"Assessing Maximum Sprinting Speed in Female Team Sport: The Role of Sprint Distance and Timing-Gate Configuration.","authors":"Eddie McGuinness, Kris Beattie, Mark Lyons, Aoife Lane, Clement Higginbotham, Robin Healy","doi":"10.1123/ijspp.2025-0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to (1) determine if differences exist in female team-sport maximum sprinting speed (MSS) using sprint distances of 30 and 40 m and split times over 5- and 10-m intervals, (2) determine the intertrial reliability of MSS using each measurement method, and (3) examine the association between sprint acceleration distance and MSS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Elite and subelite female Gaelic football players (N = 62) performed 40-m sprints with dual-beam timing gates placed every 5 m. Four measurement methods were used to determine MSS: 5-m split times over a 40-m sprint distance, 5-m splits over 30 m, 10-m split times over 40 m, and 10 -m splits over 30 m.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed significant differences (P < .001) in MSS-derived differences from the different measurement methods with a ηp2 of .494 (large effect). MSS was significantly different between all methods (mean differences: 0.02-0.08 m·s-1; Cohen dz: 0.49-1.25). The greatest mean MSS was achieved using 5-m splits over 40 m. All MSS measurement methods had high relative and absolute reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: .97-.98; coefficient of variations: 1.0%-1.2%; standard error of measurement: 0.07-0.08 m·s-1). There was a significant moderate positive correlation (ρ = .41) between MSS and acceleration distance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The highest estimate of MSS was found using 5-m splits over 40 m. All measurement methods displayed high reliability; we recommend the use of 5 -m splits over ∼30 m when assessing MSS in female team-sport athletes with timing gates.</p>","PeriodicalId":14295,"journal":{"name":"International journal of sports physiology and performance","volume":" ","pages":"1168-1171"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of sports physiology and performance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2025-0029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to (1) determine if differences exist in female team-sport maximum sprinting speed (MSS) using sprint distances of 30 and 40 m and split times over 5- and 10-m intervals, (2) determine the intertrial reliability of MSS using each measurement method, and (3) examine the association between sprint acceleration distance and MSS.

Methods: Elite and subelite female Gaelic football players (N = 62) performed 40-m sprints with dual-beam timing gates placed every 5 m. Four measurement methods were used to determine MSS: 5-m split times over a 40-m sprint distance, 5-m splits over 30 m, 10-m split times over 40 m, and 10 -m splits over 30 m.

Results: A repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed significant differences (P < .001) in MSS-derived differences from the different measurement methods with a ηp2 of .494 (large effect). MSS was significantly different between all methods (mean differences: 0.02-0.08 m·s-1; Cohen dz: 0.49-1.25). The greatest mean MSS was achieved using 5-m splits over 40 m. All MSS measurement methods had high relative and absolute reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: .97-.98; coefficient of variations: 1.0%-1.2%; standard error of measurement: 0.07-0.08 m·s-1). There was a significant moderate positive correlation (ρ = .41) between MSS and acceleration distance.

Conclusion: The highest estimate of MSS was found using 5-m splits over 40 m. All measurement methods displayed high reliability; we recommend the use of 5 -m splits over ∼30 m when assessing MSS in female team-sport athletes with timing gates.

评价女子团体运动最大冲刺速度:冲刺距离和计时门配置的作用。
目的:本研究旨在(1)确定女子团体运动最大短跑速度(MSS)在30米和40米短跑距离以及5米和10米短跑间隔上是否存在差异,(2)确定每种测量方法的MSS的试验间信度,(3)检验冲刺加速距离与MSS的相关性。方法:优秀和次优秀的女性盖尔足球运动员(N = 62)进行40米短跑,每5米放置双光束计时门。四种测量方法用于确定MSS: 5米冲刺距离超过40米,5米冲刺距离超过30米,10米冲刺距离超过40米,10米冲刺距离超过30米。结果:重复测量方差分析显示,不同测量方法产生的mss差异差异显著(P < 0.001), ηp2为0.494(大效应)。各方法间MSS差异显著(平均差异为0.02 ~ 0.08 m·s-1;Cohen dz: 0.49-1.25)。在40米的间隔中,5米的间隔获得了最大的平均MSS。所有MSS测量方法均具有较高的相对信度和绝对信度(类内相关系数:0.97 ~ 0.98;变异系数:1.0%-1.2%;测量标准误差:0.07-0.08 m·s-1)。MSS与加速度距离之间存在显著的中度正相关(ρ = 0.41)。结论:MSS的最高估计值是在40米的裂缝中发现的5米裂缝。所有测量方法均显示出较高的可靠性;我们建议在评估带有计时门的女性团队运动运动员的MSS时,使用5米劈叉~ 30米。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
199
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (IJSPP) focuses on sport physiology and performance and is dedicated to advancing the knowledge of sport and exercise physiologists, sport-performance researchers, and other sport scientists. The journal publishes authoritative peer-reviewed research in sport physiology and related disciplines, with an emphasis on work having direct practical applications in enhancing sport performance in sport physiology and related disciplines. IJSPP publishes 10 issues per year: January, February, March, April, May, July, August, September, October, and November.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信