Neurointerventional procedures using sheathless 8 Fr Optimo balloon guide catheter via transradial access: A single-center experience with 100 cases.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Taichiro Imahori, Shigeru Miyake, Ichiro Maeda, Hiroki Goto, Rikuo Nishii, Haruka Enami, Daisuke Yamamoto, Hirotoshi Hamaguchi, Kohkichi Hosoda, Naoki Kaneko, Nobuyuki Sakai, Takashi Sasayama
{"title":"Neurointerventional procedures using sheathless 8 Fr Optimo balloon guide catheter via transradial access: A single-center experience with 100 cases.","authors":"Taichiro Imahori, Shigeru Miyake, Ichiro Maeda, Hiroki Goto, Rikuo Nishii, Haruka Enami, Daisuke Yamamoto, Hirotoshi Hamaguchi, Kohkichi Hosoda, Naoki Kaneko, Nobuyuki Sakai, Takashi Sasayama","doi":"10.1177/15910199251348744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of neurointerventional procedures performed via transradial access (TRA) using a sheathless 8 Fr Optimo balloon guide catheter (BGC).MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 100 consecutive neurointerventional procedures performed via TRA using a sheathless 8 Fr Optimo BGC at a single center. Technical success was defined as the successful delivery of the BGC to the target vessel without conversion to an alternative access site or catheter system, along with the completion of the planned procedure.ResultsA total of 100 procedures were performed in 95 patients (median age: 75 years; 63% male). The most common interventions were aneurysm coiling or flow diversion (45%) and carotid artery stenting (36%). Target vessels for BGC placement included the right carotid (59%), left carotid (31%), right vertebral (4%), and left vertebral (6%) arteries. The median BGC navigation time was 12 min (interquartile range: 7-20). Technical success was achieved in 95% of procedures. In five cases, conversion to transulnar, transbrachial, or transfemoral access was required; nevertheless, all planned procedures were completed successfully. Balloon inflation was utilized in 37% of procedures for distal embolic protection, rupture management, or device delivery support. No major access-related complications were observed. Symptomatic non-access-related periprocedural complications occurred in 3% of cases. The overall mortality rate was 2%.ConclusionsNeurointerventional procedures performed via TRA using a sheathless 8 Fr Optimo BGC appear to be feasible and safe, offering a high technical success rate and a low incidence of access-related complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":14380,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199251348744"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251348744","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of neurointerventional procedures performed via transradial access (TRA) using a sheathless 8 Fr Optimo balloon guide catheter (BGC).MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 100 consecutive neurointerventional procedures performed via TRA using a sheathless 8 Fr Optimo BGC at a single center. Technical success was defined as the successful delivery of the BGC to the target vessel without conversion to an alternative access site or catheter system, along with the completion of the planned procedure.ResultsA total of 100 procedures were performed in 95 patients (median age: 75 years; 63% male). The most common interventions were aneurysm coiling or flow diversion (45%) and carotid artery stenting (36%). Target vessels for BGC placement included the right carotid (59%), left carotid (31%), right vertebral (4%), and left vertebral (6%) arteries. The median BGC navigation time was 12 min (interquartile range: 7-20). Technical success was achieved in 95% of procedures. In five cases, conversion to transulnar, transbrachial, or transfemoral access was required; nevertheless, all planned procedures were completed successfully. Balloon inflation was utilized in 37% of procedures for distal embolic protection, rupture management, or device delivery support. No major access-related complications were observed. Symptomatic non-access-related periprocedural complications occurred in 3% of cases. The overall mortality rate was 2%.ConclusionsNeurointerventional procedures performed via TRA using a sheathless 8 Fr Optimo BGC appear to be feasible and safe, offering a high technical success rate and a low incidence of access-related complications.

经桡骨通路使用无鞘8 Fr Optimo球囊导尿管的神经介入手术:100例单中心经验
目的本研究旨在评估使用无鞘8 Fr Optimo球囊导尿管(BGC)经桡骨通路(TRA)进行神经介入手术的可行性和安全性。方法回顾性分析了100例连续的神经介入手术,这些手术均通过TRA在单中心使用无鞘8 Fr Optimo BGC进行。技术上的成功被定义为成功地将BGC输送到目标血管,而没有转换到替代的通路部位或导管系统,并完成计划的程序。结果95例患者共行100例手术,中位年龄75岁;63%的男性)。最常见的干预措施是动脉瘤盘绕或分流(45%)和颈动脉支架置入(36%)。BGC放置的靶血管包括右颈动脉(59%)、左颈动脉(31%)、右椎动脉(4%)和左椎动脉(6%)。BGC导航时间中位数为12 min(四分位数间距为7 ~ 20)。95%的手术技术成功率。在5例患者中,需要转经尺骨、肱或股动脉通路;然而,所有计划的程序都顺利完成。在远端栓塞保护、破裂处理或器械输送支持的手术中,37%的手术采用球囊充气。未观察到主要的通路相关并发症。3%的病例出现了与通路无关的症状性围手术期并发症。总死亡率为2%。结论使用无鞘8 Fr Optimo BGC经TRA行神经介入手术可行且安全,技术成功率高,通路相关并发症发生率低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信