Scaling up the Med-South Lifestyle Program in public health settings to reduce chronic disease risk: a hybrid implementation-effectiveness study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Frontiers in Public Health Pub Date : 2025-06-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1564567
Carmen D Samuel-Hodge, Lisa Pham, Kiira Lyons, Lindy B Draeger, Li Jiang, Feng-Chang Lin, Rachel Ram, Jennifer Leeman
{"title":"Scaling up the Med-South Lifestyle Program in public health settings to reduce chronic disease risk: a hybrid implementation-effectiveness study.","authors":"Carmen D Samuel-Hodge, Lisa Pham, Kiira Lyons, Lindy B Draeger, Li Jiang, Feng-Chang Lin, Rachel Ram, Jennifer Leeman","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2025.1564567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Major disparities persist in heart disease, diabetes, and obesity, with rates highest among those living in the southeastern and central parts of the US. Intervening to improve lifestyle behaviors represents an opportunity to address health inequities. Although the scientific rationale for lifestyle interventions is robust, evidence is limited on how to implement these interventions at scale.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a type 3 hybrid implementation-effectiveness design, we evaluated a statewide scale-up trial implementing the Med-South Lifestyle Program in mostly rural community health centers and health departments across North Carolina, in the southeastern US. Implementation outcomes were measured at the site level and program effectiveness outcomes were assessed by physiologic and behavioral changes at the participant level. Descriptive statistics and paired <i>t</i>-tests comprised our statistical analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We invited 200 public health sites to participate in the study and 28 (14%) expressed interest. Among those expressing interest, 21 (75%) signed a Memorandum of Agreement. The statewide scale-up resulted in the enrollment of 95% (19/20) of the proposed sites-13 health departments (68%) and six community health centers. The majority of the 235 study participants who started the program were adults self-identifying as non-Hispanic White (45%) or non-Hispanic Black (37%); 11% identified as Hispanic and 5% as American Indian. Most participants were female (88%), with a mean age of 51 years, and educational attainment of a 2- or 4-year college degree (57%). Implementation outcomes included 17 sites (89%) retained throughout the study and a 79% participant retention rate. Program uptake was high, with 87% of planned counseling sessions and 83% of follow-up calls completed. For our effectiveness outcomes we observed small but statistically significant changes in weight of -2.3 lbs. Similarly, systolic but not diastolic blood pressure was reduced significantly (-2.3 mm Hg). There was a significant increase in the mean weekly intakes of nuts and healthy fats, improved daily fruit-vegetable-bean scores, and a decrease in daily sugar-sweetened beverage intake. For sedentary behaviors, daily sitting time was significantly reduced.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results show successfully adapted implementation and delivery approaches to fit Med-South into the context of public health settings during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05067816, October 5, 2021.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"13 ","pages":"1564567"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12176569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1564567","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Major disparities persist in heart disease, diabetes, and obesity, with rates highest among those living in the southeastern and central parts of the US. Intervening to improve lifestyle behaviors represents an opportunity to address health inequities. Although the scientific rationale for lifestyle interventions is robust, evidence is limited on how to implement these interventions at scale.

Methods: Using a type 3 hybrid implementation-effectiveness design, we evaluated a statewide scale-up trial implementing the Med-South Lifestyle Program in mostly rural community health centers and health departments across North Carolina, in the southeastern US. Implementation outcomes were measured at the site level and program effectiveness outcomes were assessed by physiologic and behavioral changes at the participant level. Descriptive statistics and paired t-tests comprised our statistical analyses.

Results: We invited 200 public health sites to participate in the study and 28 (14%) expressed interest. Among those expressing interest, 21 (75%) signed a Memorandum of Agreement. The statewide scale-up resulted in the enrollment of 95% (19/20) of the proposed sites-13 health departments (68%) and six community health centers. The majority of the 235 study participants who started the program were adults self-identifying as non-Hispanic White (45%) or non-Hispanic Black (37%); 11% identified as Hispanic and 5% as American Indian. Most participants were female (88%), with a mean age of 51 years, and educational attainment of a 2- or 4-year college degree (57%). Implementation outcomes included 17 sites (89%) retained throughout the study and a 79% participant retention rate. Program uptake was high, with 87% of planned counseling sessions and 83% of follow-up calls completed. For our effectiveness outcomes we observed small but statistically significant changes in weight of -2.3 lbs. Similarly, systolic but not diastolic blood pressure was reduced significantly (-2.3 mm Hg). There was a significant increase in the mean weekly intakes of nuts and healthy fats, improved daily fruit-vegetable-bean scores, and a decrease in daily sugar-sweetened beverage intake. For sedentary behaviors, daily sitting time was significantly reduced.

Conclusions: These results show successfully adapted implementation and delivery approaches to fit Med-South into the context of public health settings during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05067816, October 5, 2021.

在公共卫生环境中扩大中南部生活方式项目以降低慢性病风险:一项实施-有效性混合研究
在心脏病、糖尿病和肥胖症方面的主要差异仍然存在,在美国东南部和中部地区的发病率最高。干预以改善生活方式行为是解决卫生不平等问题的一个机会。尽管生活方式干预的科学依据是强有力的,但关于如何大规模实施这些干预措施的证据有限。方法:采用3型混合实施-有效性设计,我们评估了在美国东南部北卡罗来纳州大部分农村社区卫生中心和卫生部门实施中南生活方式项目的全州规模试验。在现场水平上测量实施结果,在参与者水平上通过生理和行为变化评估项目有效性结果。我们的统计分析包括描述性统计和配对t检验。结果:我们邀请了200个公共卫生站点参与研究,其中28个(14%)表示感兴趣。在表示有兴趣的公司中,有21家(75%)签署了协议备忘录。在全州范围内扩大规模的结果是95%(19/20)的拟议地点——13个卫生部门(68%)和6个社区卫生中心——的登记人数增加。在235名开始该项目的研究参与者中,大多数是自认为是非西班牙裔白人(45%)或非西班牙裔黑人(37%)的成年人;11%为西班牙裔,5%为美洲印第安人。大多数参与者是女性(88%),平均年龄为51岁,教育程度为2年或4年大学学位(57%)。实施结果包括整个研究期间保留的17个站点(89%)和79%的参与者保留率。项目的使用率很高,87%的计划咨询会议和83%的后续电话都完成了。对于我们的有效性结果,我们观察到体重变化很小,但在统计上有显著意义,为-2.3磅。同样,收缩压明显降低(-2.3 mm Hg),但舒张压没有明显降低。每周坚果和健康脂肪的平均摄入量显著增加,每日水果-蔬菜-豆类得分提高,每日含糖饮料摄入量减少。对于久坐行为,每天坐着的时间显著减少。结论:这些结果表明,在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,成功调整了实施和交付方法,使中南模式适应了公共卫生环境。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05067816, 2021年10月5日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers in Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
4469
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Public Health is a multidisciplinary open-access journal which publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research and is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public worldwide. The journal aims at overcoming current fragmentation in research and publication, promoting consistency in pursuing relevant scientific themes, and supporting finding dissemination and translation into practice. Frontiers in Public Health is organized into Specialty Sections that cover different areas of research in the field. Please refer to the author guidelines for details on article types and the submission process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信