{"title":"Brain activation during vocal motor imagery: a pilot functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study.","authors":"Narihiro Kodama, Ryo Hatazoe, Kohei Kotegawa","doi":"10.1007/s00221-025-07125-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to clarify the differences in brain activation during actual vocalization and imagery, thereby deepening our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying motor imagery.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted on 23 healthy young adults (aged 21-22 years) who met strict voice and hearing criteria. Participants performed sustained phonation and vocal imagery tasks while listening to pre-recorded audio of the vowel /a:/ and humming /m:/. Brain activity in the right prefrontal cortex (rPFC), frontal pole (FP), and left prefrontal cortex (IPFC) was measured using a 16-channel functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) system. A block design with baseline correction was applied to calculate changes in oxyhemoglobin concentration. Motor imagery ability was assessed using imagined Timed Up and Go Test (iTUG), and delta times between normal and maximum walking speeds were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences in activation values of the rPFC, FP, and IPFC were observed between the vocalization and imagery conditions. In addition, both conditions exhibited large variability across all regions, indicating substantial individual differences. Furthermore, while a significant correlation was found between the delta times of normal and maximum walking speeds, no significant correlations were observed between brain activation in the rPFC, FP, or IPFC and the delta times under the imagery condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No significant differences were found in neural activation between vocalization and imagery, but high variability in both conditions suggests individual differences. This study highlights both the potential and limitations of using fNIRS to assess brain activity in these tasks.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 4: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":"243 7","pages":"177"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-025-07125-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to clarify the differences in brain activation during actual vocalization and imagery, thereby deepening our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying motor imagery.
Study design: Prospective study.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 23 healthy young adults (aged 21-22 years) who met strict voice and hearing criteria. Participants performed sustained phonation and vocal imagery tasks while listening to pre-recorded audio of the vowel /a:/ and humming /m:/. Brain activity in the right prefrontal cortex (rPFC), frontal pole (FP), and left prefrontal cortex (IPFC) was measured using a 16-channel functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) system. A block design with baseline correction was applied to calculate changes in oxyhemoglobin concentration. Motor imagery ability was assessed using imagined Timed Up and Go Test (iTUG), and delta times between normal and maximum walking speeds were calculated.
Results: No significant differences in activation values of the rPFC, FP, and IPFC were observed between the vocalization and imagery conditions. In addition, both conditions exhibited large variability across all regions, indicating substantial individual differences. Furthermore, while a significant correlation was found between the delta times of normal and maximum walking speeds, no significant correlations were observed between brain activation in the rPFC, FP, or IPFC and the delta times under the imagery condition.
Conclusions: No significant differences were found in neural activation between vocalization and imagery, but high variability in both conditions suggests individual differences. This study highlights both the potential and limitations of using fNIRS to assess brain activity in these tasks.
期刊介绍：
Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
