Employing a single trial motor equivalent analysis for the assessment of motor learning.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Matthew Beerse, Kimberly E Bigelow, Joaquin A Barrios
{"title":"Employing a single trial motor equivalent analysis for the assessment of motor learning.","authors":"Matthew Beerse, Kimberly E Bigelow, Joaquin A Barrios","doi":"10.1007/s00221-025-07123-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The uncontrolled manifold analysis (UCM) is a useful technique for motor learning research enabling the classification of movement variability into solutions and errors. Less explored methodological considerations within the UCM framework are the selection of mean configurations outside of the current performance, as found in the Motor Equivalence Analysis, and a single trial approach. In this study, we demonstrated how calculating deviations away from varying mean configurations within the UCM influences the results and interpretations within motor learning experiments. Twelve young adult subjects (9F/3 M, 20.53 ± 1.25 years old) practiced the kettlebell swing over a one-week time period. We compared deviations from the mean configuration across all repetitions, to the mean of the first ten repetitions before practice and to the mean of their last ten repetitions after practice. Results suggested that subjects abandoned their initial mean performance within the first sets of kettlebell swings and reduced their errors and solutions towards what would become their mean performance after practice. They continued to refine their performance 1 week later. Subjects then completed a transfer task, testing their ability to adapt to a water-filled kettlebell. We evaluated deviations from their mean performance with the metal kettlebell and their mean performance with the water-filled kettlebell. Subjects did not reduce errors towards their mean metal kettlebell performance, but instead towards a new performance that matched the dynamics of the water-filled kettlebell. When performance is expected to change, i.e., motor learning, assessing how the variance structure changes with respect to different mean configurations can provide further insight when using a UCM approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":"243 7","pages":"179"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12181205/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-025-07123-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The uncontrolled manifold analysis (UCM) is a useful technique for motor learning research enabling the classification of movement variability into solutions and errors. Less explored methodological considerations within the UCM framework are the selection of mean configurations outside of the current performance, as found in the Motor Equivalence Analysis, and a single trial approach. In this study, we demonstrated how calculating deviations away from varying mean configurations within the UCM influences the results and interpretations within motor learning experiments. Twelve young adult subjects (9F/3 M, 20.53 ± 1.25 years old) practiced the kettlebell swing over a one-week time period. We compared deviations from the mean configuration across all repetitions, to the mean of the first ten repetitions before practice and to the mean of their last ten repetitions after practice. Results suggested that subjects abandoned their initial mean performance within the first sets of kettlebell swings and reduced their errors and solutions towards what would become their mean performance after practice. They continued to refine their performance 1 week later. Subjects then completed a transfer task, testing their ability to adapt to a water-filled kettlebell. We evaluated deviations from their mean performance with the metal kettlebell and their mean performance with the water-filled kettlebell. Subjects did not reduce errors towards their mean metal kettlebell performance, but instead towards a new performance that matched the dynamics of the water-filled kettlebell. When performance is expected to change, i.e., motor learning, assessing how the variance structure changes with respect to different mean configurations can provide further insight when using a UCM approach.

采用单试验运动等效分析评估运动学习。
非控制流形分析(UCM)是一种有用的运动学习研究技术,它可以将运动变异性分为解决方案和错误。在UCM框架中较少探索的方法学考虑因素是当前性能之外的平均配置的选择,如在电机等效分析中发现的那样,以及单一试验方法。在这项研究中,我们展示了在UCM中计算偏离不同均值配置的偏差如何影响运动学习实验中的结果和解释。12名年轻成人(9岁/3岁,20.53±1.25岁)在一周的时间内练习壶铃摇摆。我们比较了所有重复的平均配置的偏差,练习前十次重复的平均值和练习后最后十次重复的平均值。结果表明,受试者在第一组壶铃摆动中放弃了他们最初的平均表现,并减少了他们的错误和解决方案,以达到练习后的平均表现。一周后,他们继续改进他们的表演。然后,受试者完成了一项转移任务,测试他们适应装满水的壶铃的能力。我们评估了它们与金属壶铃的平均性能和它们与充水壶铃的平均性能之间的偏差。受试者并没有减少对他们的平均金属壶铃表现的错误,而是朝着与装满水的壶铃的动态相匹配的新表现。当期望性能发生变化时,例如,运动学习,在使用UCM方法时,评估相对于不同均值配置的方差结构如何变化可以提供进一步的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信