A European survey on anaerobes from paediatric blood cultures: a comparative analysis with adults.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Matteo Boattini, Arianna Aceti, Paulo Bastos, Viktoria Eirini Mavromanolaki, Sofia Maraki, Anastasia Spiliopoulou, Vasileios Kakouris, Yordan Kalchev, Ana Budimir, Branka Bedenić, Zana Rubic, Monica Licker, Corina Musuroi, Emese Juhász, Katalin Kristóf, Mateja Pirs, Ivana Velimirovic, Michael Berktold, Adriána Liptáková, Adriana Krajčíková, Pavel Drevinek, Anezka Gryndlerova, Monika Brzychczy-Wloch, Aldona Olechowska-Jarząb, Filip Bielec, Małgorzata Brauncajs, Edyta Podsiadly, Grażyna Nurzyńska, Patrycja Zalas-Więcek, Anna Michalska, Kristian Riesbeck, Hanna-Sofia Andersson, Tone Tønjum, Johan Christian Berild, Truls Michael Leegaard, Asger Nellemann Rasmussen, Kristian Schønning, Stefan Glöckner, Jürgen Rödel, Mohamed Tarek Badr, Georg Alexander Häcker, Denise Stark, Axel Hamprecht, Anna Dudakova, Jonathan Jantsch, Stefano Mancini, Chantal Quiblier, Damien Jacot, Gilbert Greub, Tiziano Ferniani, Simone Ambretti, Maddalena Calvo, Stefania Stefani, Rogier Schade, Erlangga Yusuf, Stefanie van Kleef-van Koeveringe, Sarah Vandamme, Alexia Verroken, Hector Rodriguez-Villalobos, François Duigou, Stéphane Corvec, Pauline Floch, Clémence Massip, Delphine Chainier, Olivier Barraud, Marie-Bossuète Louissaint, Assaf Mizrahi, Saied Ali, Maeve Doyle, Clarice Egan, Sinead McNicholas, Javier Colomina-Rodriguez, Ignacio Torres, Raul Gillaranz Luengo, Maria Nieves Larrosa Escartín, Maria Belen Viñado Perez, Ana Verónica Halperin, Sergio Fuente García, Rafael Cantón, Miguel Seruca, Vasco Santos Mendes, Dinah Carvalho, Rossana Cavallo, José Melo Cristino, Cristina Costa, Gabriele Bianco
{"title":"A European survey on anaerobes from paediatric blood cultures: a comparative analysis with adults.","authors":"Matteo Boattini, Arianna Aceti, Paulo Bastos, Viktoria Eirini Mavromanolaki, Sofia Maraki, Anastasia Spiliopoulou, Vasileios Kakouris, Yordan Kalchev, Ana Budimir, Branka Bedenić, Zana Rubic, Monica Licker, Corina Musuroi, Emese Juhász, Katalin Kristóf, Mateja Pirs, Ivana Velimirovic, Michael Berktold, Adriána Liptáková, Adriana Krajčíková, Pavel Drevinek, Anezka Gryndlerova, Monika Brzychczy-Wloch, Aldona Olechowska-Jarząb, Filip Bielec, Małgorzata Brauncajs, Edyta Podsiadly, Grażyna Nurzyńska, Patrycja Zalas-Więcek, Anna Michalska, Kristian Riesbeck, Hanna-Sofia Andersson, Tone Tønjum, Johan Christian Berild, Truls Michael Leegaard, Asger Nellemann Rasmussen, Kristian Schønning, Stefan Glöckner, Jürgen Rödel, Mohamed Tarek Badr, Georg Alexander Häcker, Denise Stark, Axel Hamprecht, Anna Dudakova, Jonathan Jantsch, Stefano Mancini, Chantal Quiblier, Damien Jacot, Gilbert Greub, Tiziano Ferniani, Simone Ambretti, Maddalena Calvo, Stefania Stefani, Rogier Schade, Erlangga Yusuf, Stefanie van Kleef-van Koeveringe, Sarah Vandamme, Alexia Verroken, Hector Rodriguez-Villalobos, François Duigou, Stéphane Corvec, Pauline Floch, Clémence Massip, Delphine Chainier, Olivier Barraud, Marie-Bossuète Louissaint, Assaf Mizrahi, Saied Ali, Maeve Doyle, Clarice Egan, Sinead McNicholas, Javier Colomina-Rodriguez, Ignacio Torres, Raul Gillaranz Luengo, Maria Nieves Larrosa Escartín, Maria Belen Viñado Perez, Ana Verónica Halperin, Sergio Fuente García, Rafael Cantón, Miguel Seruca, Vasco Santos Mendes, Dinah Carvalho, Rossana Cavallo, José Melo Cristino, Cristina Costa, Gabriele Bianco","doi":"10.1007/s10096-025-05185-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Infections caused by anaerobes are common in children. However, limited data are available on bloodstream infections caused by these bacteria in Europe. A multicentre retrospective observational study was conducted over a 4-year period (2020-2023) across 44 European hospitals to analyze all anaerobes isolated from blood cultures. The study examined the epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance profiles of anaerobes identified in paediatric patients, comparing the findings with those observed in adults. Among the 14,527 total anaerobic isolates, 186 (1.3%) were detected from paediatric patients. These were predominantly Gram-positive (70%) and Gram-negative (22%) bacilli. The most prevalent species in paediatric patients were Cutibacterium acnes (24.7%), Schaalia odontolytica (9.7%), Actinomyces oris (8.1%), and Bacteroides fragilis (7.5%). Relative feature importance based on the mean SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values distinguished paediatric patients and adults based on their antibiotic resistance patterns with high accuracy. Compared to those from adult patients, Gram-positive bacilli detected in paediatric samples displayed higher resistance rates for meropenem (15% vs. 9%), metronidazole (52% vs. 24%), and vancomycin (27% vs. 6%), and lower resistance to benzylpenicillin (11% vs. 17%), amoxicillin/clavulanate (9% vs. 17%), and clindamycin (30% vs. 36%). Gram-negative bacilli in paediatric samples displayed lower resistance to benzylpenicillin (18% vs. 29%), piperacillin/tazobactam (26% vs. 33%), and clindamycin (20% vs. 27%), and they were highly susceptible to imipenem, meropenem, and metronidazole as those detected in adult patients. Bacteroides species detected in paediatric and adult patients displayed high resistance to piperacillin/tazobactam (33% vs. 39%) and clindamycin (38% vs. 29%), while they were highly susceptible to metronidazole. Compared to those from adult samples, Cutibacterium acnes in paediatric patients displayed lower resistance to benzylpenicillin (none vs. 15%) and clindamycin (17% vs. 29%). The comparison of species and susceptibility profiles of anaerobes detected in paediatric and adult patients highlighted the importance of reporting antimicrobial susceptibility surveillance data by age group.</p>","PeriodicalId":11782,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-025-05185-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Infections caused by anaerobes are common in children. However, limited data are available on bloodstream infections caused by these bacteria in Europe. A multicentre retrospective observational study was conducted over a 4-year period (2020-2023) across 44 European hospitals to analyze all anaerobes isolated from blood cultures. The study examined the epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance profiles of anaerobes identified in paediatric patients, comparing the findings with those observed in adults. Among the 14,527 total anaerobic isolates, 186 (1.3%) were detected from paediatric patients. These were predominantly Gram-positive (70%) and Gram-negative (22%) bacilli. The most prevalent species in paediatric patients were Cutibacterium acnes (24.7%), Schaalia odontolytica (9.7%), Actinomyces oris (8.1%), and Bacteroides fragilis (7.5%). Relative feature importance based on the mean SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values distinguished paediatric patients and adults based on their antibiotic resistance patterns with high accuracy. Compared to those from adult patients, Gram-positive bacilli detected in paediatric samples displayed higher resistance rates for meropenem (15% vs. 9%), metronidazole (52% vs. 24%), and vancomycin (27% vs. 6%), and lower resistance to benzylpenicillin (11% vs. 17%), amoxicillin/clavulanate (9% vs. 17%), and clindamycin (30% vs. 36%). Gram-negative bacilli in paediatric samples displayed lower resistance to benzylpenicillin (18% vs. 29%), piperacillin/tazobactam (26% vs. 33%), and clindamycin (20% vs. 27%), and they were highly susceptible to imipenem, meropenem, and metronidazole as those detected in adult patients. Bacteroides species detected in paediatric and adult patients displayed high resistance to piperacillin/tazobactam (33% vs. 39%) and clindamycin (38% vs. 29%), while they were highly susceptible to metronidazole. Compared to those from adult samples, Cutibacterium acnes in paediatric patients displayed lower resistance to benzylpenicillin (none vs. 15%) and clindamycin (17% vs. 29%). The comparison of species and susceptibility profiles of anaerobes detected in paediatric and adult patients highlighted the importance of reporting antimicrobial susceptibility surveillance data by age group.

欧洲对儿童血液培养中厌氧菌的调查:与成人的比较分析。
由厌氧菌引起的感染在儿童中很常见。然而,在欧洲,关于这些细菌引起的血液感染的数据有限。在44家欧洲医院进行了一项为期4年(2020-2023)的多中心回顾性观察研究,分析了从血液培养中分离出的所有厌氧菌。该研究检查了儿科患者中发现的厌氧菌的流行病学和抗菌素耐药性概况,并将结果与成人观察到的结果进行了比较。14527株厌氧菌中,186株(1.3%)来自儿科患者。这些主要是革兰氏阳性(70%)和革兰氏阴性(22%)杆菌。儿童患者中最常见的菌种是痤疮表皮杆菌(24.7%)、溶牙沙利亚菌(9.7%)、口放线菌(8.1%)和脆弱拟杆菌(7.5%)。基于平均SHapley加性解释(SHapley Additive explanatory)值的相对特征重要性区分儿科患者和成人患者的抗生素耐药模式具有很高的准确性。与成人患者相比,在儿童样本中检测到的革兰氏阳性杆菌对美罗培南(15%对9%)、甲硝唑(52%对24%)和万古霉素(27%对6%)的耐药率更高,对青霉素(11%对17%)、阿莫西林/克拉维酸盐(9%对17%)和克林霉素(30%对36%)的耐药率较低。儿童样本中的革兰氏阴性杆菌对青霉素(18%对29%)、哌拉西林/他唑巴坦(26%对33%)和克林霉素(20%对27%)的耐药性较低,对亚胺培南、美罗培南和甲硝唑高度敏感,与成人样本中检测到的一样。在儿童和成人患者中检测到的拟杆菌种类对哌西林/他唑巴坦(33%对39%)和克林霉素(38%对29%)表现出高耐药性,而对甲硝唑高度敏感。与成人样本相比,儿科患者的痤疮表皮杆菌对青霉素(无对15%)和克林霉素(17%对29%)的耐药性较低。在儿科和成人患者中检测到的厌氧菌种类和药敏概况的比较突出了按年龄组报告抗菌药物敏感性监测数据的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
2.20%
发文量
138
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: EJCMID is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to the publication of communications on infectious diseases of bacterial, viral and parasitic origin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信