Peak Integration of Electropherograms in GMP and Research Labs: Navigating Increased Scrutiny Amid Data Integrity Audits and Inspections.

IF 3 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
ELECTROPHORESIS Pub Date : 2025-06-19 DOI:10.1002/elps.70002
Timothy Blanc, Hermann Wätzig, Cari Sänger-van de Griend
{"title":"Peak Integration of Electropherograms in GMP and Research Labs: Navigating Increased Scrutiny Amid Data Integrity Audits and Inspections.","authors":"Timothy Blanc, Hermann Wätzig, Cari Sänger-van de Griend","doi":"10.1002/elps.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Capillary electrophoresis (CE) often offers superior separation relative to chromatography for macromolecules like monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), a major pharmaceutical class. However, electropherogram baselines pose challenges that traditional chromatography algorithms cannot address, requiring complex integration processes. Integration in good manufacturing practice (GMP) laboratories is critically important and has become a focus of data integrity-centric regulatory inspections. Electropherogram integration challenges, the increased use of CE, data systems developed for chromatograms rather than electropherograms, and the increased regulatory scrutiny call for a resolution. This necessity also extends to R&D, clinical, and academic labs. This review examines authoritative sources such as pharmacopoeias, World Health Organization (WHO), Parenteral Drug Association (PDA), and scientific literature. However, none address electropherogram integration. These sources concur that companies should develop integration policies and SOPs. Training programs must ensure analysts are proficient in integration techniques and reviewers are appropriately qualified to assess integrations. Integration parameters must be captured, including slope sensitivity, smoothing factors, and timed events like peak start and stop and baseline correction. Analytical procedures (APs) should include illustrations that define proper integration. Although automatic integration is preferred for its efficiency and objectivity, it is not always accurate. Therefore, manual integration should be permitted under specific conditions, with all settings and iterations documented, justified, and reviewed. Industry collaboration is proposed to create practical integration guidelines specifically for CE.</p>","PeriodicalId":11596,"journal":{"name":"ELECTROPHORESIS","volume":" ","pages":"e70002"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELECTROPHORESIS","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.70002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Capillary electrophoresis (CE) often offers superior separation relative to chromatography for macromolecules like monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), a major pharmaceutical class. However, electropherogram baselines pose challenges that traditional chromatography algorithms cannot address, requiring complex integration processes. Integration in good manufacturing practice (GMP) laboratories is critically important and has become a focus of data integrity-centric regulatory inspections. Electropherogram integration challenges, the increased use of CE, data systems developed for chromatograms rather than electropherograms, and the increased regulatory scrutiny call for a resolution. This necessity also extends to R&D, clinical, and academic labs. This review examines authoritative sources such as pharmacopoeias, World Health Organization (WHO), Parenteral Drug Association (PDA), and scientific literature. However, none address electropherogram integration. These sources concur that companies should develop integration policies and SOPs. Training programs must ensure analysts are proficient in integration techniques and reviewers are appropriately qualified to assess integrations. Integration parameters must be captured, including slope sensitivity, smoothing factors, and timed events like peak start and stop and baseline correction. Analytical procedures (APs) should include illustrations that define proper integration. Although automatic integration is preferred for its efficiency and objectivity, it is not always accurate. Therefore, manual integration should be permitted under specific conditions, with all settings and iterations documented, justified, and reviewed. Industry collaboration is proposed to create practical integration guidelines specifically for CE.

在GMP和研究实验室中峰值集成的电泳图:在数据完整性审计和检查中导航增加审查。
毛细管电泳(CE)对于单克隆抗体(mab)等大分子(主要的药物类别)通常提供比色谱法更好的分离。然而,电泳基线带来了传统色谱算法无法解决的挑战,需要复杂的集成过程。良好生产规范(GMP)实验室的整合至关重要,并已成为以数据完整性为中心的监管检查的焦点。电泳图集成的挑战、CE使用的增加、为色谱图而不是电泳图开发的数据系统以及监管审查的增加都需要解决。这种必要性也延伸到研发、临床和学术实验室。本综述查阅了权威来源,如药典、世界卫生组织(WHO)、肠外用药协会(PDA)和科学文献。然而,没有一个涉及到电泳整合。这些来源一致认为,公司应该制定集成政策和sop。培训计划必须确保分析人员精通集成技术,并且审查人员有适当的资格来评估集成。必须捕获集成参数,包括斜率灵敏度、平滑因子和时间事件,如峰值启动和停止以及基线校正。分析程序(ap)应该包括定义适当集成的说明。尽管自动集成因其效率和客观性而受到青睐,但它并不总是准确的。因此,在特定的条件下应该允许手工集成,所有的设置和迭代都要记录、证明和审查。建议进行行业协作,专门为CE创建实用的集成指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ELECTROPHORESIS
ELECTROPHORESIS 生物-分析化学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
13.80%
发文量
244
审稿时长
1.9 months
期刊介绍: ELECTROPHORESIS is an international journal that publishes original manuscripts on all aspects of electrophoresis, and liquid phase separations (e.g., HPLC, micro- and nano-LC, UHPLC, micro- and nano-fluidics, liquid-phase micro-extractions, etc.). Topics include new or improved analytical and preparative methods, sample preparation, development of theory, and innovative applications of electrophoretic and liquid phase separations methods in the study of nucleic acids, proteins, carbohydrates natural products, pharmaceuticals, food analysis, environmental species and other compounds of importance to the life sciences. Papers in the areas of microfluidics and proteomics, which are not limited to electrophoresis-based methods, will also be accepted for publication. Contributions focused on hyphenated and omics techniques are also of interest. Proteomics is within the scope, if related to its fundamentals and new technical approaches. Proteomics applications are only considered in particular cases. Papers describing the application of standard electrophoretic methods will not be considered. Papers on nanoanalysis intended for publication in ELECTROPHORESIS should focus on one or more of the following topics: • Nanoscale electrokinetics and phenomena related to electric double layer and/or confinement in nano-sized geometry • Single cell and subcellular analysis • Nanosensors and ultrasensitive detection aspects (e.g., involving quantum dots, "nanoelectrodes" or nanospray MS) • Nanoscale/nanopore DNA sequencing (next generation sequencing) • Micro- and nanoscale sample preparation • Nanoparticles and cells analyses by dielectrophoresis • Separation-based analysis using nanoparticles, nanotubes and nanowires.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信