Implementation of the national community health policy in Guinea: a decision space analysis of the roles and responsibilities of community health workers.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Alexandre Delamou, Fassou Mathias Grovogui, Facely Camara, Delphin Kolié, Tohaninzé Goumou, Lior Miller, Amy Nye, Thomas Bossert
{"title":"Implementation of the national community health policy in Guinea: a decision space analysis of the roles and responsibilities of community health workers.","authors":"Alexandre Delamou, Fassou Mathias Grovogui, Facely Camara, Delphin Kolié, Tohaninzé Goumou, Lior Miller, Amy Nye, Thomas Bossert","doi":"10.1007/s00103-025-04076-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Community health workers (CHW) are crucial for universal health coverage (UHC) in low- and middle-income countries. Decentralization supports this goal but can cause issues if local actors misunderstand their roles. This study explores how Guinea's local health system actors understood and executed their responsibilities in delivering community health services from 2017 to 2021.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a subanalysis of 168 CHW from a larger study of 522 respondents on the implementation of community health policy in Guinea. We used a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design to assess the knowledge, involvement, and decision space of national community health policy actors, focusing on CHW and community volunteers (Relais communautaires [RECO]). This analysis was guided by decision space theory and explored both de jure (formal) and de facto (actual) decision-making. De jure decision space refers to the choices authorized by official strategies, policies, or laws, while de facto decision space reflects the choices reported by local actors in practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all commune types, CHW and RECO demonstrated high knowledge and implementation levels of their roles in community health. Contrary to the initial hypothesis that fully implemented communes would have the highest decision-making space, commune type was not the primary determinant of decision-making space for CHW and RECO. The presence of CHW was positively associated with greater de jure and de facto decision-making space and enhanced capacity (p = 0.050). Univariate analysis showed that increased BCG vaccination coverage (vaccine to protect against tuberculosis) was significantly associated with expanded de jure decision-making space (p = 0.041). Bivariate (p = 0.014) and multivariate (p = 0.011) analyses revealed that higher pentavalent vaccination coverage (vaccine to protect against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, and Haemophilus influenzae type b) was also significantly associated with a larger de jure decision-making space.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In countries with decentralized responsibilities, it is crucial for community health actors to understand their decision-making range to improve health outcomes. Also, ensuring sufficient and consistent capacity and funding is essential to enhance health services.</p>","PeriodicalId":9562,"journal":{"name":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-025-04076-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Community health workers (CHW) are crucial for universal health coverage (UHC) in low- and middle-income countries. Decentralization supports this goal but can cause issues if local actors misunderstand their roles. This study explores how Guinea's local health system actors understood and executed their responsibilities in delivering community health services from 2017 to 2021.

Methods: This is a subanalysis of 168 CHW from a larger study of 522 respondents on the implementation of community health policy in Guinea. We used a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design to assess the knowledge, involvement, and decision space of national community health policy actors, focusing on CHW and community volunteers (Relais communautaires [RECO]). This analysis was guided by decision space theory and explored both de jure (formal) and de facto (actual) decision-making. De jure decision space refers to the choices authorized by official strategies, policies, or laws, while de facto decision space reflects the choices reported by local actors in practice.

Results: Across all commune types, CHW and RECO demonstrated high knowledge and implementation levels of their roles in community health. Contrary to the initial hypothesis that fully implemented communes would have the highest decision-making space, commune type was not the primary determinant of decision-making space for CHW and RECO. The presence of CHW was positively associated with greater de jure and de facto decision-making space and enhanced capacity (p = 0.050). Univariate analysis showed that increased BCG vaccination coverage (vaccine to protect against tuberculosis) was significantly associated with expanded de jure decision-making space (p = 0.041). Bivariate (p = 0.014) and multivariate (p = 0.011) analyses revealed that higher pentavalent vaccination coverage (vaccine to protect against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, and Haemophilus influenzae type b) was also significantly associated with a larger de jure decision-making space.

Conclusion: In countries with decentralized responsibilities, it is crucial for community health actors to understand their decision-making range to improve health outcomes. Also, ensuring sufficient and consistent capacity and funding is essential to enhance health services.

几内亚国家社区卫生政策的实施:社区卫生工作者作用和责任的决策空间分析。
社区卫生工作者(CHW)对低收入和中等收入国家的全民健康覆盖至关重要。权力下放支持这一目标,但如果本地参与者误解了他们的角色,可能会导致问题。本研究探讨了2017年至2021年几内亚地方卫生系统行为体如何理解和履行其在提供社区卫生服务方面的责任。方法:这是对来自几内亚社区卫生政策实施的522名受访者的大型研究中的168名CHW的亚分析。我们使用顺序解释混合方法设计来评估国家社区卫生政策参与者的知识、参与和决策空间,重点关注社区卫生工作者和社区志愿者(Relais communautres [RECO])。该分析以决策空间理论为指导,探讨了法律上(正式)和事实上(实际)的决策。法律上的决策空间是指官方战略、政策或法律授权的选择,而事实上的决策空间则反映了地方行动者在实践中报告的选择。结果:在所有社区类型中,CHW和RECO对其在社区卫生中的作用表现出较高的认识和实施水平。与最初的假设相反,全面实施的公社具有最高的决策空间,公社类型不是CHW和RECO决策空间的主要决定因素。CHW的存在与更大的法律和事实上的决策空间和增强的能力呈正相关(p = 0.050)。单因素分析显示,卡介苗接种率(预防结核病的疫苗)的增加与法律决策空间的扩大显著相关(p = 0.041)。双变量(p = 0.014)和多变量(p = 0.011)分析显示,更高的五价疫苗接种覆盖率(预防白喉、破伤风、百日咳、乙型肝炎和乙型流感嗜血杆菌的疫苗)也与更大的法律决策空间显著相关。结论:在责任下放的国家,社区卫生行为体了解其改善健康结果的决策范围至关重要。此外,确保足够和持续的能力和资金对于加强保健服务至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz
Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Monatszeitschrift Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz - umfasst alle Fragestellungen und Bereiche, mit denen sich das öffentliche Gesundheitswesen und die staatliche Gesundheitspolitik auseinandersetzen. Ziel ist es, zum einen über wesentliche Entwicklungen in der biologisch-medizinischen Grundlagenforschung auf dem Laufenden zu halten und zum anderen über konkrete Maßnahmen zum Gesundheitsschutz, über Konzepte der Prävention, Risikoabwehr und Gesundheitsförderung zu informieren. Wichtige Themengebiete sind die Epidemiologie übertragbarer und nicht übertragbarer Krankheiten, der umweltbezogene Gesundheitsschutz sowie gesundheitsökonomische, medizinethische und -rechtliche Fragestellungen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信